Cargando…

Physiological Fontan Procedure

Objective: The conventional Fontan circulation deviates the superior vena cava (SVC = 1/3 of the systemic venous return) toward the right lung (3/5 of total lung volume) and the inferior vena cava (IVC = 2/3 of the systemic venous return) toward the left lung (2/5 of total lung volume). A “physiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corno, Antonio F., Owen, Matt J., Cangiani, Andrea, Hall, Edward J. C., Rona, Aldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00196
_version_ 1783423133208805376
author Corno, Antonio F.
Owen, Matt J.
Cangiani, Andrea
Hall, Edward J. C.
Rona, Aldo
author_facet Corno, Antonio F.
Owen, Matt J.
Cangiani, Andrea
Hall, Edward J. C.
Rona, Aldo
author_sort Corno, Antonio F.
collection PubMed
description Objective: The conventional Fontan circulation deviates the superior vena cava (SVC = 1/3 of the systemic venous return) toward the right lung (3/5 of total lung volume) and the inferior vena cava (IVC = 2/3 of the systemic venous return) toward the left lung (2/5 of total lung volume). A “physiological” Fontan deviating the SVC toward the left lung and the IVC toward the right lung was compared with the conventional setting by computational fluid dynamics, studying whether this setting achieves a more favorable hemodynamics than the conventional Fontan circulation. Materials and Methods: An in-silico 3D parametric model of the Fontan procedure was developed using idealized vascular geometries with invariant sizes of SVC, IVC, right pulmonary artery (RPA), and left pulmonary artery (LPA), steady inflow velocities at IVC and SVC, and constant equal outflow pressures at RPA and LPA. These parameters were set to perform finite-volume incompressible steady flow simulations, assuming a single-phase, Newtonian, isothermal, laminar blood flow. Numerically converged finite-volume mass and momentum flow balances determined the inlet pressures and the outflow rates. Numerical closed-path integration of energy fluxes across domain boundaries determined the flow energy loss rate through the Fontan circulation. The comparison evaluated: (1) mean IVC pressure; (2) energy loss rate; (3) kinetic energy maximum value throughout the domain volume. Results: The comparison of the physiological vs. conventional Fontan provided these results: (1) mean IVC pressure 13.9 vs. 14.1 mmHg (= 0.2 mmHg reduction); (2) energy loss rate 5.55 vs. 6.61 mW (= 16% reduction); (3) maximum kinetic energy 283 vs. 396 J/m(3) (= 29% reduction). Conclusions: A more physiological flow distribution is accompanied by a reduction of mean IVC pressure and by substantial reductions of energy loss rate and of peak kinetic energy. The potential clinical impact of these hemodynamic changes in reducing the incidence and severity of the adverse long-term effects of the Fontan circulation, in particular liver failure and protein-losing enteropathy, still remains to be assessed and will be the subject of future work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6543709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65437092019-06-07 Physiological Fontan Procedure Corno, Antonio F. Owen, Matt J. Cangiani, Andrea Hall, Edward J. C. Rona, Aldo Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objective: The conventional Fontan circulation deviates the superior vena cava (SVC = 1/3 of the systemic venous return) toward the right lung (3/5 of total lung volume) and the inferior vena cava (IVC = 2/3 of the systemic venous return) toward the left lung (2/5 of total lung volume). A “physiological” Fontan deviating the SVC toward the left lung and the IVC toward the right lung was compared with the conventional setting by computational fluid dynamics, studying whether this setting achieves a more favorable hemodynamics than the conventional Fontan circulation. Materials and Methods: An in-silico 3D parametric model of the Fontan procedure was developed using idealized vascular geometries with invariant sizes of SVC, IVC, right pulmonary artery (RPA), and left pulmonary artery (LPA), steady inflow velocities at IVC and SVC, and constant equal outflow pressures at RPA and LPA. These parameters were set to perform finite-volume incompressible steady flow simulations, assuming a single-phase, Newtonian, isothermal, laminar blood flow. Numerically converged finite-volume mass and momentum flow balances determined the inlet pressures and the outflow rates. Numerical closed-path integration of energy fluxes across domain boundaries determined the flow energy loss rate through the Fontan circulation. The comparison evaluated: (1) mean IVC pressure; (2) energy loss rate; (3) kinetic energy maximum value throughout the domain volume. Results: The comparison of the physiological vs. conventional Fontan provided these results: (1) mean IVC pressure 13.9 vs. 14.1 mmHg (= 0.2 mmHg reduction); (2) energy loss rate 5.55 vs. 6.61 mW (= 16% reduction); (3) maximum kinetic energy 283 vs. 396 J/m(3) (= 29% reduction). Conclusions: A more physiological flow distribution is accompanied by a reduction of mean IVC pressure and by substantial reductions of energy loss rate and of peak kinetic energy. The potential clinical impact of these hemodynamic changes in reducing the incidence and severity of the adverse long-term effects of the Fontan circulation, in particular liver failure and protein-losing enteropathy, still remains to be assessed and will be the subject of future work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6543709/ /pubmed/31179252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00196 Text en Copyright © 2019 Corno, Owen, Cangiani, Hall and Rona. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Corno, Antonio F.
Owen, Matt J.
Cangiani, Andrea
Hall, Edward J. C.
Rona, Aldo
Physiological Fontan Procedure
title Physiological Fontan Procedure
title_full Physiological Fontan Procedure
title_fullStr Physiological Fontan Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Fontan Procedure
title_short Physiological Fontan Procedure
title_sort physiological fontan procedure
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00196
work_keys_str_mv AT cornoantoniof physiologicalfontanprocedure
AT owenmattj physiologicalfontanprocedure
AT cangianiandrea physiologicalfontanprocedure
AT halledwardjc physiologicalfontanprocedure
AT ronaaldo physiologicalfontanprocedure