Cargando…

A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND: Obesity is one of the largest drivers of health care spending but nearly half of the population with obesity demonstrate suboptimal readiness for weight loss treatment. Black women are disproportionately likely to have both obesity and limited weight loss readiness. However, they have be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnan, Anirudh, Finkelstein, Eric Andrew, Levine, Erica, Foley, Perry, Askew, Sandy, Steinberg, Dori, Bennett, Gary G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31102373
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12201
_version_ 1783423145787523072
author Krishnan, Anirudh
Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
Levine, Erica
Foley, Perry
Askew, Sandy
Steinberg, Dori
Bennett, Gary G
author_facet Krishnan, Anirudh
Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
Levine, Erica
Foley, Perry
Askew, Sandy
Steinberg, Dori
Bennett, Gary G
author_sort Krishnan, Anirudh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity is one of the largest drivers of health care spending but nearly half of the population with obesity demonstrate suboptimal readiness for weight loss treatment. Black women are disproportionately likely to have both obesity and limited weight loss readiness. However, they have been shown to be receptive to strategies that prevent weight gain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of a digital weight gain prevention intervention (Shape) for black women. Shape consisted of adaptive telephone-based coaching by health system personnel, a tailored skills training curriculum, and patient self-monitoring delivered via a fully automated interactive voice response system. METHODS: A cost and cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized clinical trial of the Shape intervention was conducted from the payer perspective. Costs included those of delivering the program to 91 intervention participants in the trial and were summarized by program elements: self-monitoring, skills training, coaching, and administration. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The primary outcome was the incremental cost per QALY of Shape relative to usual care. RESULTS: Shape cost an average of US $758 per participant. The base-case model in which quality of life benefits decay linearly to zero 5 years post intervention cessation, generated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US $55,264 per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggest an ICER below US $50,000 per QALY and US $100,000 per QALY in 39% and 98% of simulations, respectively. Results are highly sensitive to durability of benefits, rising to US $165,730 if benefits end 6 months post intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the Shape intervention is cost-effective based on established benchmarks, indicating that it can be a part of a successful strategy to address the nation’s growing obesity epidemic in low-income at-risk communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6543798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65437982019-06-19 A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Krishnan, Anirudh Finkelstein, Eric Andrew Levine, Erica Foley, Perry Askew, Sandy Steinberg, Dori Bennett, Gary G J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Obesity is one of the largest drivers of health care spending but nearly half of the population with obesity demonstrate suboptimal readiness for weight loss treatment. Black women are disproportionately likely to have both obesity and limited weight loss readiness. However, they have been shown to be receptive to strategies that prevent weight gain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of a digital weight gain prevention intervention (Shape) for black women. Shape consisted of adaptive telephone-based coaching by health system personnel, a tailored skills training curriculum, and patient self-monitoring delivered via a fully automated interactive voice response system. METHODS: A cost and cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized clinical trial of the Shape intervention was conducted from the payer perspective. Costs included those of delivering the program to 91 intervention participants in the trial and were summarized by program elements: self-monitoring, skills training, coaching, and administration. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The primary outcome was the incremental cost per QALY of Shape relative to usual care. RESULTS: Shape cost an average of US $758 per participant. The base-case model in which quality of life benefits decay linearly to zero 5 years post intervention cessation, generated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US $55,264 per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggest an ICER below US $50,000 per QALY and US $100,000 per QALY in 39% and 98% of simulations, respectively. Results are highly sensitive to durability of benefits, rising to US $165,730 if benefits end 6 months post intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the Shape intervention is cost-effective based on established benchmarks, indicating that it can be a part of a successful strategy to address the nation’s growing obesity epidemic in low-income at-risk communities. JMIR Publications 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6543798/ /pubmed/31102373 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12201 Text en ©Anirudh Krishnan, Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Erica Levine, Perry Foley, Sandy Askew, Dori Steinberg, Gary G Bennett. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Krishnan, Anirudh
Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
Levine, Erica
Foley, Perry
Askew, Sandy
Steinberg, Dori
Bennett, Gary G
A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short A Digital Behavioral Weight Gain Prevention Intervention in Primary Care Practice: Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort digital behavioral weight gain prevention intervention in primary care practice: cost and cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31102373
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12201
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnananirudh adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT finkelsteinericandrew adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT levineerica adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT foleyperry adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT askewsandy adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT steinbergdori adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT bennettgaryg adigitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT krishnananirudh digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT finkelsteinericandrew digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT levineerica digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT foleyperry digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT askewsandy digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT steinbergdori digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT bennettgaryg digitalbehavioralweightgainpreventioninterventioninprimarycarepracticecostandcosteffectivenessanalysis