Cargando…
Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods
Sensor-based data are becoming increasingly widespread in social, behavioral, and organizational sciences. Far from providing a neutral window on “reality,” sensor-based big-data are highly complex, constructed data sources. Nevertheless, a more systematic approach to the validation of sensors as a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31178800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01188 |
_version_ | 1783423163109998592 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Jörg Fàbregues, Sergi Guenther, Elisabeth Anna Romano, María José |
author_facet | Müller, Jörg Fàbregues, Sergi Guenther, Elisabeth Anna Romano, María José |
author_sort | Müller, Jörg |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sensor-based data are becoming increasingly widespread in social, behavioral, and organizational sciences. Far from providing a neutral window on “reality,” sensor-based big-data are highly complex, constructed data sources. Nevertheless, a more systematic approach to the validation of sensors as a method of data collection is lacking, as their use and conceptualization have been spread out across different strands of social-, behavioral-, and computer science literature. Further debunking the myth of raw data, the present article argues that, in order to validate sensor-based data, researchers need to take into account the mutual interdependence between types of sensors available on the market, the conceptual (construct) choices made in the research process, and the contextual cues. Sensor-based data in research are usually combined with additional quantitative and qualitative data sources. However, the incompatibility between the highly granular nature of sensor data and the static, a-temporal character of traditional quantitative and qualitative data has not been sufficiently emphasized as a key limiting factor of sensor-based research. It is likely that the failure to consider the basic quality criteria of social science measurement indicators more explicitly may lead to the production of insignificant results, despite the availability of high volume and high-resolution data. The paper concludes with recommendations for designing and conducting mixed methods studies using sensors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6543914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65439142019-06-07 Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods Müller, Jörg Fàbregues, Sergi Guenther, Elisabeth Anna Romano, María José Front Psychol Psychology Sensor-based data are becoming increasingly widespread in social, behavioral, and organizational sciences. Far from providing a neutral window on “reality,” sensor-based big-data are highly complex, constructed data sources. Nevertheless, a more systematic approach to the validation of sensors as a method of data collection is lacking, as their use and conceptualization have been spread out across different strands of social-, behavioral-, and computer science literature. Further debunking the myth of raw data, the present article argues that, in order to validate sensor-based data, researchers need to take into account the mutual interdependence between types of sensors available on the market, the conceptual (construct) choices made in the research process, and the contextual cues. Sensor-based data in research are usually combined with additional quantitative and qualitative data sources. However, the incompatibility between the highly granular nature of sensor data and the static, a-temporal character of traditional quantitative and qualitative data has not been sufficiently emphasized as a key limiting factor of sensor-based research. It is likely that the failure to consider the basic quality criteria of social science measurement indicators more explicitly may lead to the production of insignificant results, despite the availability of high volume and high-resolution data. The paper concludes with recommendations for designing and conducting mixed methods studies using sensors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6543914/ /pubmed/31178800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01188 Text en Copyright © 2019 Müller, Fàbregues, Guenther and Romano. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Müller, Jörg Fàbregues, Sergi Guenther, Elisabeth Anna Romano, María José Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods |
title | Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods |
title_full | Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods |
title_fullStr | Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods |
title_short | Using Sensors in Organizational Research—Clarifying Rationales and Validation Challenges for Mixed Methods |
title_sort | using sensors in organizational research—clarifying rationales and validation challenges for mixed methods |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6543914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31178800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerjorg usingsensorsinorganizationalresearchclarifyingrationalesandvalidationchallengesformixedmethods AT fabreguessergi usingsensorsinorganizationalresearchclarifyingrationalesandvalidationchallengesformixedmethods AT guentherelisabethanna usingsensorsinorganizationalresearchclarifyingrationalesandvalidationchallengesformixedmethods AT romanomariajose usingsensorsinorganizationalresearchclarifyingrationalesandvalidationchallengesformixedmethods |