Cargando…

TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY – There are several options for hypopharyngeal reconstruction depending on defect size. Reconstructive options include primary closure, local flaps, regional axial flaps or regional intestinal flaps, and free flap transfer with skin or intestinal free flaps. The preferred method of reconstru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pegan, Alan, Rašić, Ivan, Košec, Andro, Solter, Darko, Vagić, Davor, Bedeković, Vladimir, Ivkić, Mirko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168205
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.04.10
_version_ 1783423198379900928
author Pegan, Alan
Rašić, Ivan
Košec, Andro
Solter, Darko
Vagić, Davor
Bedeković, Vladimir
Ivkić, Mirko
author_facet Pegan, Alan
Rašić, Ivan
Košec, Andro
Solter, Darko
Vagić, Davor
Bedeković, Vladimir
Ivkić, Mirko
author_sort Pegan, Alan
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY – There are several options for hypopharyngeal reconstruction depending on defect size. Reconstructive options include primary closure, local flaps, regional axial flaps or regional intestinal flaps, and free flap transfer with skin or intestinal free flaps. The preferred method of reconstruction should minimize early postoperative complications that prolong hospital stay and/or become life threatening, ensure early restoration of function and decrease donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of different flap reconstruction methods in type II hypopharyngeal defects. In this non-randomized retrospective cohort study, data on 31 (27 male and four female) patients were collected over a 10-year period of single institution type II hypopharyngeal defect reconstructions. The following measures of functional outcome were extracted from patient medical histories: postoperative complications (flap failure, fistula formation, donor site related complications), hospital stay in days and swallowing function after 14 days, 1 month and 6 months. There were nine patients in the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction group, seven in the jejunum reconstruction group, and 15 in the gastric tube reconstruction group. In the RFFF group, three patients experienced flap failure; in the jejunal transfer group, no donor site morbidity was observed; whereas three patients from the gastric tube reconstruction group had minor abdominal skin wound dehiscence. Out of the 3 different reconstructive methods, RFFF was most likely to fail. The mean duration of hospital stay was 22.6 days, being shortest in the RFFF group. There were no significant differences in early postoperative swallowing function among the groups. The choice of flap used for hypopharynx reconstruction should be driven by donor site factors and functional outcomes. When assessing type II hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction results, the findings of this study suggest that free jejunal flaps and gastric tubes offer superior functional results in comparison with RFFFs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65441152019-06-04 TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE Pegan, Alan Rašić, Ivan Košec, Andro Solter, Darko Vagić, Davor Bedeković, Vladimir Ivkić, Mirko Acta Clin Croat Original Scientific Papers SUMMARY – There are several options for hypopharyngeal reconstruction depending on defect size. Reconstructive options include primary closure, local flaps, regional axial flaps or regional intestinal flaps, and free flap transfer with skin or intestinal free flaps. The preferred method of reconstruction should minimize early postoperative complications that prolong hospital stay and/or become life threatening, ensure early restoration of function and decrease donor site morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of different flap reconstruction methods in type II hypopharyngeal defects. In this non-randomized retrospective cohort study, data on 31 (27 male and four female) patients were collected over a 10-year period of single institution type II hypopharyngeal defect reconstructions. The following measures of functional outcome were extracted from patient medical histories: postoperative complications (flap failure, fistula formation, donor site related complications), hospital stay in days and swallowing function after 14 days, 1 month and 6 months. There were nine patients in the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction group, seven in the jejunum reconstruction group, and 15 in the gastric tube reconstruction group. In the RFFF group, three patients experienced flap failure; in the jejunal transfer group, no donor site morbidity was observed; whereas three patients from the gastric tube reconstruction group had minor abdominal skin wound dehiscence. Out of the 3 different reconstructive methods, RFFF was most likely to fail. The mean duration of hospital stay was 22.6 days, being shortest in the RFFF group. There were no significant differences in early postoperative swallowing function among the groups. The choice of flap used for hypopharynx reconstruction should be driven by donor site factors and functional outcomes. When assessing type II hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction results, the findings of this study suggest that free jejunal flaps and gastric tubes offer superior functional results in comparison with RFFFs. Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medical Research, Vinogradska cesta c. 29 Zagreb 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6544115/ /pubmed/31168205 http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.04.10 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Pegan, Alan
Rašić, Ivan
Košec, Andro
Solter, Darko
Vagić, Davor
Bedeković, Vladimir
Ivkić, Mirko
TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
title TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
title_full TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
title_fullStr TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
title_full_unstemmed TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
title_short TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
title_sort type ii hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction - a single institution experience
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168205
http://dx.doi.org/10.20471/acc.2018.57.04.10
work_keys_str_mv AT peganalan typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience
AT rasicivan typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience
AT kosecandro typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience
AT solterdarko typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience
AT vagicdavor typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience
AT bedekovicvladimir typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience
AT ivkicmirko typeiihypopharyngealdefectreconstructionasingleinstitutionexperience