Cargando…

Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia

INTRODUCTION: In 2016, for the very first time, the Ministry of Health in Zambia implemented a reactive outbreak response to control the spread of cholera and vaccinated at-risk populations with a single dose of Shancol—an oral cholera vaccine (OCV). This study aimed to assess the costs of cholera i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tembo, Tannia, Simuyandi, Michelo, Chiyenu, Kanema, Sharma, Anjali, Chilyabanyama, Obvious N., Mbwili-Muleya, Clara, Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy, Chilengi, Roma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215972
_version_ 1783423213145948160
author Tembo, Tannia
Simuyandi, Michelo
Chiyenu, Kanema
Sharma, Anjali
Chilyabanyama, Obvious N.
Mbwili-Muleya, Clara
Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy
Chilengi, Roma
author_facet Tembo, Tannia
Simuyandi, Michelo
Chiyenu, Kanema
Sharma, Anjali
Chilyabanyama, Obvious N.
Mbwili-Muleya, Clara
Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy
Chilengi, Roma
author_sort Tembo, Tannia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In 2016, for the very first time, the Ministry of Health in Zambia implemented a reactive outbreak response to control the spread of cholera and vaccinated at-risk populations with a single dose of Shancol—an oral cholera vaccine (OCV). This study aimed to assess the costs of cholera illness and determine the cost-effectiveness of the 2016 vaccination campaign. METHODOLOGY: From April to June 2017, we conducted a retrospective cost and cost-effectiveness analysis in three peri-urban areas of Lusaka. To estimate costs of illness from a household perspective, a systematic random sample of 189 in-patients confirmed with V. cholera were identified from Cholera Treatment Centre registers and interviewed for out-of-pocket costs. Vaccine delivery and health systems costs were extracted from financial records at the District Health Office and health facilities. The cost of cholera treatment was derived by multiplying the subsidized cost of drugs by the quantity administered to patients during hospitalisation. The cost-effectiveness analysis measured incremental cost-effectiveness ratio—cost per case averted, cost per life saved and cost per DALY averted—for a single dose OCV. RESULTS: The mean cost per administered vaccine was US$1.72. Treatment costs per hospitalized episode were US$14.49–US$18.03 for patients ≤15 years old and US$17.66–US$35.16 for older patients. Whereas households incurred costs on non-medical items such as communication, beverages, food and transport during illness, a large proportion of medical costs were borne by the health system. Assuming vaccine effectiveness of 88.9% and 63%, a life expectancy of 62 years and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of US$1,500, the costs per case averted were estimated US$369–US$532. Costs per life year saved ranged from US$18,515–US$27,976. The total cost per DALY averted was estimated between US$698–US$1,006 for patients ≤15 years old and US$666–US$1,000 for older patients. CONCLUSION: Our study determined that reactive vaccination campaign with a single dose of Shancol for cholera control in densely populated areas of Lusaka was cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65442102019-06-17 Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia Tembo, Tannia Simuyandi, Michelo Chiyenu, Kanema Sharma, Anjali Chilyabanyama, Obvious N. Mbwili-Muleya, Clara Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy Chilengi, Roma PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: In 2016, for the very first time, the Ministry of Health in Zambia implemented a reactive outbreak response to control the spread of cholera and vaccinated at-risk populations with a single dose of Shancol—an oral cholera vaccine (OCV). This study aimed to assess the costs of cholera illness and determine the cost-effectiveness of the 2016 vaccination campaign. METHODOLOGY: From April to June 2017, we conducted a retrospective cost and cost-effectiveness analysis in three peri-urban areas of Lusaka. To estimate costs of illness from a household perspective, a systematic random sample of 189 in-patients confirmed with V. cholera were identified from Cholera Treatment Centre registers and interviewed for out-of-pocket costs. Vaccine delivery and health systems costs were extracted from financial records at the District Health Office and health facilities. The cost of cholera treatment was derived by multiplying the subsidized cost of drugs by the quantity administered to patients during hospitalisation. The cost-effectiveness analysis measured incremental cost-effectiveness ratio—cost per case averted, cost per life saved and cost per DALY averted—for a single dose OCV. RESULTS: The mean cost per administered vaccine was US$1.72. Treatment costs per hospitalized episode were US$14.49–US$18.03 for patients ≤15 years old and US$17.66–US$35.16 for older patients. Whereas households incurred costs on non-medical items such as communication, beverages, food and transport during illness, a large proportion of medical costs were borne by the health system. Assuming vaccine effectiveness of 88.9% and 63%, a life expectancy of 62 years and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of US$1,500, the costs per case averted were estimated US$369–US$532. Costs per life year saved ranged from US$18,515–US$27,976. The total cost per DALY averted was estimated between US$698–US$1,006 for patients ≤15 years old and US$666–US$1,000 for older patients. CONCLUSION: Our study determined that reactive vaccination campaign with a single dose of Shancol for cholera control in densely populated areas of Lusaka was cost-effective. Public Library of Science 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6544210/ /pubmed/31150406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215972 Text en © 2019 Tembo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tembo, Tannia
Simuyandi, Michelo
Chiyenu, Kanema
Sharma, Anjali
Chilyabanyama, Obvious N.
Mbwili-Muleya, Clara
Mazaba, Mazyanga Lucy
Chilengi, Roma
Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia
title Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia
title_full Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia
title_fullStr Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia
title_short Evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in Lusaka, Zambia
title_sort evaluating the costs of cholera illness and cost-effectiveness of a single dose oral vaccination campaign in lusaka, zambia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215972
work_keys_str_mv AT tembotannia evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT simuyandimichelo evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT chiyenukanema evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT sharmaanjali evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT chilyabanyamaobviousn evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT mbwilimuleyaclara evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT mazabamazyangalucy evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia
AT chilengiroma evaluatingthecostsofcholeraillnessandcosteffectivenessofasingledoseoralvaccinationcampaigninlusakazambia