Cargando…

Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback

The physics of star formation and the deposition of mass, momentum, and energy into the interstellar medium by massive stars (‘feedback’) are the main uncertainties in modern cosmological simulations of galaxy formation and evolution1, 2. These processes determine the properties of galaxies3, 4, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik, Schruba, Andreas, Chevance, Mélanie, Longmore, Steven N., Hygate, Alexander P. S., Haydon, Daniel T., McLeod, Anna F., Dalcanton, Julianne J., Tacconi, Linda J., van Dishoeck, Ewine F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1194-3
_version_ 1783423263902269440
author Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik
Schruba, Andreas
Chevance, Mélanie
Longmore, Steven N.
Hygate, Alexander P. S.
Haydon, Daniel T.
McLeod, Anna F.
Dalcanton, Julianne J.
Tacconi, Linda J.
van Dishoeck, Ewine F.
author_facet Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik
Schruba, Andreas
Chevance, Mélanie
Longmore, Steven N.
Hygate, Alexander P. S.
Haydon, Daniel T.
McLeod, Anna F.
Dalcanton, Julianne J.
Tacconi, Linda J.
van Dishoeck, Ewine F.
author_sort Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik
collection PubMed
description The physics of star formation and the deposition of mass, momentum, and energy into the interstellar medium by massive stars (‘feedback’) are the main uncertainties in modern cosmological simulations of galaxy formation and evolution1, 2. These processes determine the properties of galaxies3, 4, but are poorly understood on the ≲100 pc scale of individual giant molecular clouds (GMCs)5, 6 resolved in modern galaxy formation simulations7, 8. The key question is why the timescale for depleting molecular gas through star formation in galaxies (t(dep) ≈ 2 Gyr)9, 10 exceeds the dynamical timescale of GMCs by two orders of magnitude11. Either most of a GMC’s mass is converted into stars over many dynamical times12, or only a small fraction turns into stars before the GMC is dispersed on a dynamical timescale13, 14. Here we report our observation that molecular gas and star formation are spatially decorrelated on GMC scales in the nearby flocculent spiral galaxy NGC300, contrary to their tight correlation on galactic scales5. We demonstrate that this de-correlation implies rapid evolutionary cycling between GMCs, star formation, and feedback. We apply a novel statistical method15, 16 to quantify the evolutionary timeline and find that star formation is regulated by efficient stellar feedback, driving GMC dispersal on short timescales (~1.5 Myr) due to radiation and stellar winds, prior to supernova explosions. This feedback limits GMC lifetimes to about one dynamical timescale (~10 Myr), with integrated star formation efficiencies of only 2–3%. Our findings reveal that galaxies consist of building blocks undergoing vigorous, feedback-driven lifecycles, that vary with the galactic environment and collectively define how galaxies form stars. Systematic applications of this multi-scale analysis to large galaxy samples will provide key input for a predictive, bottom-up theory of galaxy formation and evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65445242019-11-01 Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik Schruba, Andreas Chevance, Mélanie Longmore, Steven N. Hygate, Alexander P. S. Haydon, Daniel T. McLeod, Anna F. Dalcanton, Julianne J. Tacconi, Linda J. van Dishoeck, Ewine F. Nature Article The physics of star formation and the deposition of mass, momentum, and energy into the interstellar medium by massive stars (‘feedback’) are the main uncertainties in modern cosmological simulations of galaxy formation and evolution1, 2. These processes determine the properties of galaxies3, 4, but are poorly understood on the ≲100 pc scale of individual giant molecular clouds (GMCs)5, 6 resolved in modern galaxy formation simulations7, 8. The key question is why the timescale for depleting molecular gas through star formation in galaxies (t(dep) ≈ 2 Gyr)9, 10 exceeds the dynamical timescale of GMCs by two orders of magnitude11. Either most of a GMC’s mass is converted into stars over many dynamical times12, or only a small fraction turns into stars before the GMC is dispersed on a dynamical timescale13, 14. Here we report our observation that molecular gas and star formation are spatially decorrelated on GMC scales in the nearby flocculent spiral galaxy NGC300, contrary to their tight correlation on galactic scales5. We demonstrate that this de-correlation implies rapid evolutionary cycling between GMCs, star formation, and feedback. We apply a novel statistical method15, 16 to quantify the evolutionary timeline and find that star formation is regulated by efficient stellar feedback, driving GMC dispersal on short timescales (~1.5 Myr) due to radiation and stellar winds, prior to supernova explosions. This feedback limits GMC lifetimes to about one dynamical timescale (~10 Myr), with integrated star formation efficiencies of only 2–3%. Our findings reveal that galaxies consist of building blocks undergoing vigorous, feedback-driven lifecycles, that vary with the galactic environment and collectively define how galaxies form stars. Systematic applications of this multi-scale analysis to large galaxy samples will provide key input for a predictive, bottom-up theory of galaxy formation and evolution. 2019-05-22 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6544524/ /pubmed/31118525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1194-3 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik
Schruba, Andreas
Chevance, Mélanie
Longmore, Steven N.
Hygate, Alexander P. S.
Haydon, Daniel T.
McLeod, Anna F.
Dalcanton, Julianne J.
Tacconi, Linda J.
van Dishoeck, Ewine F.
Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
title Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
title_full Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
title_fullStr Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
title_full_unstemmed Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
title_short Fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
title_sort fast and inefficient star formation due to short-lived molecular clouds and rapid feedback
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1194-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kruijssenjmdiederik fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT schrubaandreas fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT chevancemelanie fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT longmorestevenn fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT hygatealexanderps fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT haydondanielt fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT mcleodannaf fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT dalcantonjuliannej fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT tacconilindaj fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback
AT vandishoeckewinef fastandinefficientstarformationduetoshortlivedmolecularcloudsandrapidfeedback