Cargando…

Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study

This study was conducted to assess the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of different voxel sizes in the detection of alveolar bone defects, and to select the optimal voxel size for clinical use. 46 in-vitro teeth were placed in bovine ribs in which alveolar bone defects were randomly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Ting, Yuan, Lingjun, Liu, Lu, Qian, Yifeng, Xia, Lunguo, Ye, Niansong, Fang, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31148581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44675-5
_version_ 1783423299068362752
author Dong, Ting
Yuan, Lingjun
Liu, Lu
Qian, Yifeng
Xia, Lunguo
Ye, Niansong
Fang, Bing
author_facet Dong, Ting
Yuan, Lingjun
Liu, Lu
Qian, Yifeng
Xia, Lunguo
Ye, Niansong
Fang, Bing
author_sort Dong, Ting
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to assess the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of different voxel sizes in the detection of alveolar bone defects, and to select the optimal voxel size for clinical use. 46 in-vitro teeth were placed in bovine ribs in which alveolar bone defects were randomly simulated. In total, 32 alveolar bone defects and 14 teeth without periodontal defects were used. CBCT images were acquired with the use of three different voxel sizes: 0.125-mm, 0.2-mm and 0.4-mm. The scan data were 3D-reconstructed in Mimics software and evaluated by two observers with more than 5 years of experience in CBCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and diagnostic values were obtained. Pairwise comparison of ROC curves was made for evaluation of the diagnostic values of different voxel sizes. Kappa statistics assessed the observer reliability. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. It showed no statistically significant difference between 0.125-mm group and 0.2-mm group, but 0.4-mm group had lower Az values that differed significantly from 0.125-mm and 0.2-mm groups (P < 0.05). Based on diagnostic value and radiation protection, 0.2-mm voxel size may be a good choice for the detection of bone defects with CBCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65447612019-06-09 Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study Dong, Ting Yuan, Lingjun Liu, Lu Qian, Yifeng Xia, Lunguo Ye, Niansong Fang, Bing Sci Rep Article This study was conducted to assess the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of different voxel sizes in the detection of alveolar bone defects, and to select the optimal voxel size for clinical use. 46 in-vitro teeth were placed in bovine ribs in which alveolar bone defects were randomly simulated. In total, 32 alveolar bone defects and 14 teeth without periodontal defects were used. CBCT images were acquired with the use of three different voxel sizes: 0.125-mm, 0.2-mm and 0.4-mm. The scan data were 3D-reconstructed in Mimics software and evaluated by two observers with more than 5 years of experience in CBCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and diagnostic values were obtained. Pairwise comparison of ROC curves was made for evaluation of the diagnostic values of different voxel sizes. Kappa statistics assessed the observer reliability. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05. It showed no statistically significant difference between 0.125-mm group and 0.2-mm group, but 0.4-mm group had lower Az values that differed significantly from 0.125-mm and 0.2-mm groups (P < 0.05). Based on diagnostic value and radiation protection, 0.2-mm voxel size may be a good choice for the detection of bone defects with CBCT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6544761/ /pubmed/31148581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44675-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Dong, Ting
Yuan, Lingjun
Liu, Lu
Qian, Yifeng
Xia, Lunguo
Ye, Niansong
Fang, Bing
Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
title Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
title_full Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
title_short Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
title_sort detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31148581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44675-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dongting detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT yuanlingjun detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT liulu detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT qianyifeng detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT xialunguo detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT yeniansong detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy
AT fangbing detectionofalveolarbonedefectswiththreedifferentvoxelsizesofconebeamcomputedtomographyaninvitrostudy