Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a genetic disorder caused by a deficiency in the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A, leading to an accumulation of glycosphingolipids in tissues across the body. Cardiac disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Advanced disease, characterised by extensive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijapurapu, Ravi, Kozor, Rebecca, Hughes, Derralynn A., Woolfson, Peter, Jovanovic, Ana, Deegan, Patrick, Rusk, Rosemary, Figtree, Gemma A., Tchan, Michel, Whalley, David, Kotecha, Dipak, Leyva, Francisco, Moon, James, Geberhiwot, Tarekegn, Steeds, Richard P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3425-1
_version_ 1783423312761716736
author Vijapurapu, Ravi
Kozor, Rebecca
Hughes, Derralynn A.
Woolfson, Peter
Jovanovic, Ana
Deegan, Patrick
Rusk, Rosemary
Figtree, Gemma A.
Tchan, Michel
Whalley, David
Kotecha, Dipak
Leyva, Francisco
Moon, James
Geberhiwot, Tarekegn
Steeds, Richard P.
author_facet Vijapurapu, Ravi
Kozor, Rebecca
Hughes, Derralynn A.
Woolfson, Peter
Jovanovic, Ana
Deegan, Patrick
Rusk, Rosemary
Figtree, Gemma A.
Tchan, Michel
Whalley, David
Kotecha, Dipak
Leyva, Francisco
Moon, James
Geberhiwot, Tarekegn
Steeds, Richard P.
author_sort Vijapurapu, Ravi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a genetic disorder caused by a deficiency in the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A, leading to an accumulation of glycosphingolipids in tissues across the body. Cardiac disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Advanced disease, characterised by extensive left ventricular hypertrophy, ventricular dysfunction and fibrosis, is known to be associated with an increase in arrhythmia. Data identifying risk factors for arrhythmia are limited, and no Fabry-specific risk stratification tool is available to select those who may benefit from initiation of medical or device therapy (implantable cardiac defibrillators). Current monitoring strategies have a limited diagnostic yield, and implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have the potential to change treatment and clinical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine whether ILRs can (1) improve arrhythmia detection in FD and (2) identify risk predictors of arrhythmia. METHODS: A prospective, 5-year, open-label, international, multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a minimum of 164 participants with genetically or enzymatically confirmed FD (or both) who have evidence of cardiac disease will be recruited from five centres: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK; Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK; and Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Participants will be block-randomised (1:1) to two study arms for cardiac monitoring (i) control arm: standard of care with annual 24 h or 5-day Holter monitor or (ii) treatment arm: continuous cardiac monitoring with ILR implantation plus standard of care. Participants will undergo multiple investigations—blood/urine biomarkers, 12-lead and advanced electrocardiogram (ECG) recording, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging—at baseline and 6–12 monthly follow-up visits. The primary endpoint is identification of arrhythmia requiring initiation or alteration in therapy. Secondary outcome measures include characterising the risk factors associated with arrhythmia and outcome data in the form of imaging, ECG and blood biomarkers. DISCUSSION: This is the first study evaluating arrhythmia burden and the use of ILR across the spectrum of risk profiles in Fabry cardiomyopathy. This will enable detailed characterisation of arrhythmic risk predictors in FD and ultimately support formulation of Fabry-specific guidance in this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03305250). Registered on 9 October 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3425-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65449232019-06-04 A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice Vijapurapu, Ravi Kozor, Rebecca Hughes, Derralynn A. Woolfson, Peter Jovanovic, Ana Deegan, Patrick Rusk, Rosemary Figtree, Gemma A. Tchan, Michel Whalley, David Kotecha, Dipak Leyva, Francisco Moon, James Geberhiwot, Tarekegn Steeds, Richard P. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a genetic disorder caused by a deficiency in the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A, leading to an accumulation of glycosphingolipids in tissues across the body. Cardiac disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Advanced disease, characterised by extensive left ventricular hypertrophy, ventricular dysfunction and fibrosis, is known to be associated with an increase in arrhythmia. Data identifying risk factors for arrhythmia are limited, and no Fabry-specific risk stratification tool is available to select those who may benefit from initiation of medical or device therapy (implantable cardiac defibrillators). Current monitoring strategies have a limited diagnostic yield, and implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have the potential to change treatment and clinical outcomes. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine whether ILRs can (1) improve arrhythmia detection in FD and (2) identify risk predictors of arrhythmia. METHODS: A prospective, 5-year, open-label, international, multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a minimum of 164 participants with genetically or enzymatically confirmed FD (or both) who have evidence of cardiac disease will be recruited from five centres: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK; Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK; Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK; and Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Participants will be block-randomised (1:1) to two study arms for cardiac monitoring (i) control arm: standard of care with annual 24 h or 5-day Holter monitor or (ii) treatment arm: continuous cardiac monitoring with ILR implantation plus standard of care. Participants will undergo multiple investigations—blood/urine biomarkers, 12-lead and advanced electrocardiogram (ECG) recording, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging—at baseline and 6–12 monthly follow-up visits. The primary endpoint is identification of arrhythmia requiring initiation or alteration in therapy. Secondary outcome measures include characterising the risk factors associated with arrhythmia and outcome data in the form of imaging, ECG and blood biomarkers. DISCUSSION: This is the first study evaluating arrhythmia burden and the use of ILR across the spectrum of risk profiles in Fabry cardiomyopathy. This will enable detailed characterisation of arrhythmic risk predictors in FD and ultimately support formulation of Fabry-specific guidance in this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03305250). Registered on 9 October 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3425-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6544923/ /pubmed/31151481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3425-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vijapurapu, Ravi
Kozor, Rebecca
Hughes, Derralynn A.
Woolfson, Peter
Jovanovic, Ana
Deegan, Patrick
Rusk, Rosemary
Figtree, Gemma A.
Tchan, Michel
Whalley, David
Kotecha, Dipak
Leyva, Francisco
Moon, James
Geberhiwot, Tarekegn
Steeds, Richard P.
A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice
title A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice
title_full A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice
title_short A randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with Fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (RaILRoAD) compared with current standard practice
title_sort randomised controlled trial evaluating arrhythmia burden, risk of sudden cardiac death and stroke in patients with fabry disease: the role of implantable loop recorders (railroad) compared with current standard practice
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3425-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vijapurapuravi arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT kozorrebecca arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT hughesderralynna arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT woolfsonpeter arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT jovanovicana arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT deeganpatrick arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT ruskrosemary arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT figtreegemmaa arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT tchanmichel arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT whalleydavid arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT kotechadipak arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT leyvafrancisco arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT moonjames arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT geberhiwottarekegn arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT steedsrichardp arandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT vijapurapuravi randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT kozorrebecca randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT hughesderralynna randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT woolfsonpeter randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT jovanovicana randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT deeganpatrick randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT ruskrosemary randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT figtreegemmaa randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT tchanmichel randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT whalleydavid randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT kotechadipak randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT leyvafrancisco randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT moonjames randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT geberhiwottarekegn randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice
AT steedsrichardp randomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingarrhythmiaburdenriskofsuddencardiacdeathandstrokeinpatientswithfabrydiseasetheroleofimplantablelooprecordersrailroadcomparedwithcurrentstandardpractice