Cargando…

Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke

BACKGROUND: Among the available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) there is an absence of a PROM with a specific focus on the impact of the wide variety of visual impairments following stroke. Our aim was to develop a patient reported quality of life outcome measure for stroke survivors with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hepworth, Lauren R., Rowe, Fiona J., Burnside, Girvan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4157-3
_version_ 1783423313582751744
author Hepworth, Lauren R.
Rowe, Fiona J.
Burnside, Girvan
author_facet Hepworth, Lauren R.
Rowe, Fiona J.
Burnside, Girvan
author_sort Hepworth, Lauren R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) there is an absence of a PROM with a specific focus on the impact of the wide variety of visual impairments following stroke. Our aim was to develop a patient reported quality of life outcome measure for stroke survivors with visual impairment. METHODS: Potential items were sourced from a combination of existing PROMs from a systematic review and qualitative in-depth interviews, duplicates were removed and items shortlisted. The initial pilot instrument was created following a ranking exercise of these potential items and consultation with stroke survivors. Version 1 was piloted with 37 stroke survivors at acute and chronic stages. Version 2 was piloted with 243 stroke survivors with visual impairment at acute and chronic stages. This data was analysed using the Rasch measurement model. Simultaneously, items from Version 2 underwent a Delphi process with stroke survivors and stroke clinicians, to assess the importance of each item. Final consensus decisions on item removal were made using the combined analysis from the Rasch measurement model and Delphi process in a nominal group meeting. RESULTS: Due to the wide range of rank given to the majority of categories/items, only two items were discarded. Version 1 comprised of 102 items with 5 response categories relating to amount of difficulty. The pilot of Version 1 allowed item reduction based on analysis of floor/ceiling effects and not applicable responses. Version 2 comprised of 62 items. Within the nominal group meeting, the expert panel created a set of rules which aided them with decision making in addition to the Rasch and Delphi analysis data. This resulted in the removal of 43 items and the combination of seven items to create three new items. The expert panel also recommended the rewording of three items. CONCLUSION: The Brain Injury associated Visual Impairment Impact Questionnaire (BIVI-IQ-15), a 15-item instrument with 4 response categories has been developed for capturing vision-related quality of life of stroke survivors with any of the predominant types of visual impairment, in the presence of other impairments and for both inpatients and outpatients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4157-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65449262019-06-04 Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke Hepworth, Lauren R. Rowe, Fiona J. Burnside, Girvan BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Among the available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) there is an absence of a PROM with a specific focus on the impact of the wide variety of visual impairments following stroke. Our aim was to develop a patient reported quality of life outcome measure for stroke survivors with visual impairment. METHODS: Potential items were sourced from a combination of existing PROMs from a systematic review and qualitative in-depth interviews, duplicates were removed and items shortlisted. The initial pilot instrument was created following a ranking exercise of these potential items and consultation with stroke survivors. Version 1 was piloted with 37 stroke survivors at acute and chronic stages. Version 2 was piloted with 243 stroke survivors with visual impairment at acute and chronic stages. This data was analysed using the Rasch measurement model. Simultaneously, items from Version 2 underwent a Delphi process with stroke survivors and stroke clinicians, to assess the importance of each item. Final consensus decisions on item removal were made using the combined analysis from the Rasch measurement model and Delphi process in a nominal group meeting. RESULTS: Due to the wide range of rank given to the majority of categories/items, only two items were discarded. Version 1 comprised of 102 items with 5 response categories relating to amount of difficulty. The pilot of Version 1 allowed item reduction based on analysis of floor/ceiling effects and not applicable responses. Version 2 comprised of 62 items. Within the nominal group meeting, the expert panel created a set of rules which aided them with decision making in addition to the Rasch and Delphi analysis data. This resulted in the removal of 43 items and the combination of seven items to create three new items. The expert panel also recommended the rewording of three items. CONCLUSION: The Brain Injury associated Visual Impairment Impact Questionnaire (BIVI-IQ-15), a 15-item instrument with 4 response categories has been developed for capturing vision-related quality of life of stroke survivors with any of the predominant types of visual impairment, in the presence of other impairments and for both inpatients and outpatients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4157-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6544926/ /pubmed/31151449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4157-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hepworth, Lauren R.
Rowe, Fiona J.
Burnside, Girvan
Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
title Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
title_full Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
title_fullStr Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
title_full_unstemmed Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
title_short Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
title_sort development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4157-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hepworthlaurenr developmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasuresformeasuringtheimpactofvisualimpairmentfollowingstroke
AT rowefionaj developmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasuresformeasuringtheimpactofvisualimpairmentfollowingstroke
AT burnsidegirvan developmentofapatientreportedoutcomemeasuresformeasuringtheimpactofvisualimpairmentfollowingstroke