Cargando…
Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review
BACKGROUND: From 2005 to 2010, we conducted 2 randomized studies on a journal (Medicina Clínica), where we took manuscripts received for publication and randomly assigned them to either the standard editorial process or to additional processes. Both studies were based on the use of methodological re...
Autores principales: | Vilaró, Marta, Cortés, Jordi, Selva-O’Callaghan, Albert, Urrutia, Agustín, Ribera, Josep-Maria, Cardellach, Francesc, Basagaña, Xavier, Elmore, Matthew, Vilardell, Miquel, Altman, Douglas, González, José-Antonio, Cobo, Erik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0746-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial
por: Cobo, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial
por: Cobo, E, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Synthesizing existing evidence to design future trials: survey of methodologists from European institutions
por: Nikolakopoulou, Adriani, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Anti-MDA5 Antibodies in a Large Mediterranean Population of Adults with Dermatomyositis
por: Labrador-Horrillo, Moises, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Surgeons’ and methodologists’ perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study
por: Cook, Jonathan A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)