Cargando…

Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era

BACKGROUND: One of the greatest challenges that countries face regarding the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for child health regard the actions required to improve neonatal health; these interventions have to be informed by evidence. In view of the persisting high numb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waiswa, Peter, Okuga, Monica, Kabwijamu, Lydia, Akuze, Joseph, Sengendo, Hanifah, Aliganyira, Patrick, Pirio, Patricia, Hanson, Claudia, Kaharuza, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0459-5
_version_ 1783423323723530240
author Waiswa, Peter
Okuga, Monica
Kabwijamu, Lydia
Akuze, Joseph
Sengendo, Hanifah
Aliganyira, Patrick
Pirio, Patricia
Hanson, Claudia
Kaharuza, Frank
author_facet Waiswa, Peter
Okuga, Monica
Kabwijamu, Lydia
Akuze, Joseph
Sengendo, Hanifah
Aliganyira, Patrick
Pirio, Patricia
Hanson, Claudia
Kaharuza, Frank
author_sort Waiswa, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the greatest challenges that countries face regarding the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for child health regard the actions required to improve neonatal health; these interventions have to be informed by evidence. In view of the persisting high numbers of newborn deaths in Uganda, we aimed to define a locally contextualised national research agenda for newborn health to guide national investments towards SDG targets. METHODS: We adopted a systematic approach for priority-setting adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. We identified and listed local newborn researchers and experts in Uganda by reviewing the PubMed database, through a snowballing technique, and engaged the Ministry of Health. Participants were requested to generate at least three research questions. The collated questions were sent to the same expert group to be rated using five criteria, including answerability, scalability, impact, generalisability and speed. FINDINGS: Of the 300 researchers and stakeholders contacted, 104 responded (36%) and generated 304 questions. These questions were collated and duplicates removed giving a condensed list of 41 research questions. These questions were then rated by 82 experts. Of the top 15 research questions, 86.7% (13/15) were in the service delivery and 6.7% (1/15) in the development domain, while only 6.7% (1/15) was in the group ‘other’. None of the leading 15 questions was in the discovery domain. Strategies to improve quality of intrapartum care featured high in the responses, while research around care for premature babies was not a perceived focus of research. CONCLUSIONS: The focus of improved evidence to guide and innovate service delivery, foremost intrapartum care, reflects the importance of this area as accelerated improvement is likely to yield fast and sustained survival gains in the neonatal period and beyond in Uganda. We recommend that other countries adapt a similar approach in defining priority reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health areas for investment in order to accelerate progress towards achieving the SDGs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0459-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6544968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65449682019-06-04 Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era Waiswa, Peter Okuga, Monica Kabwijamu, Lydia Akuze, Joseph Sengendo, Hanifah Aliganyira, Patrick Pirio, Patricia Hanson, Claudia Kaharuza, Frank Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: One of the greatest challenges that countries face regarding the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets for child health regard the actions required to improve neonatal health; these interventions have to be informed by evidence. In view of the persisting high numbers of newborn deaths in Uganda, we aimed to define a locally contextualised national research agenda for newborn health to guide national investments towards SDG targets. METHODS: We adopted a systematic approach for priority-setting adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. We identified and listed local newborn researchers and experts in Uganda by reviewing the PubMed database, through a snowballing technique, and engaged the Ministry of Health. Participants were requested to generate at least three research questions. The collated questions were sent to the same expert group to be rated using five criteria, including answerability, scalability, impact, generalisability and speed. FINDINGS: Of the 300 researchers and stakeholders contacted, 104 responded (36%) and generated 304 questions. These questions were collated and duplicates removed giving a condensed list of 41 research questions. These questions were then rated by 82 experts. Of the top 15 research questions, 86.7% (13/15) were in the service delivery and 6.7% (1/15) in the development domain, while only 6.7% (1/15) was in the group ‘other’. None of the leading 15 questions was in the discovery domain. Strategies to improve quality of intrapartum care featured high in the responses, while research around care for premature babies was not a perceived focus of research. CONCLUSIONS: The focus of improved evidence to guide and innovate service delivery, foremost intrapartum care, reflects the importance of this area as accelerated improvement is likely to yield fast and sustained survival gains in the neonatal period and beyond in Uganda. We recommend that other countries adapt a similar approach in defining priority reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health areas for investment in order to accelerate progress towards achieving the SDGs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-019-0459-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6544968/ /pubmed/31151401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0459-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Waiswa, Peter
Okuga, Monica
Kabwijamu, Lydia
Akuze, Joseph
Sengendo, Hanifah
Aliganyira, Patrick
Pirio, Patricia
Hanson, Claudia
Kaharuza, Frank
Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era
title Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era
title_full Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era
title_fullStr Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era
title_full_unstemmed Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era
title_short Using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the Uganda newborn research priorities in the SDG era
title_sort using research priority-setting to guide bridging the implementation gap in countries – a case study of the uganda newborn research priorities in the sdg era
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0459-5
work_keys_str_mv AT waiswapeter usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT okugamonica usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT kabwijamulydia usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT akuzejoseph usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT sengendohanifah usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT aliganyirapatrick usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT piriopatricia usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT hansonclaudia usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera
AT kaharuzafrank usingresearchprioritysettingtoguidebridgingtheimplementationgapincountriesacasestudyoftheugandanewbornresearchprioritiesinthesdgera