Cargando…

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap

BACKGROUND: The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (E-RS:COPD) is a patient-reported diary that assesses respiratory symptoms in stable COPD. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm trial (GSK ID: 200699; NCT02164539) assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelsen, Linda M., Lee, Laurie A., Wu, Wei, Lin, Xiwu, Murray, Lindsey, Pascoe, Steven J., Leidy, Nancy K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1070-6
_version_ 1783423339140743168
author Nelsen, Linda M.
Lee, Laurie A.
Wu, Wei
Lin, Xiwu
Murray, Lindsey
Pascoe, Steven J.
Leidy, Nancy K.
author_facet Nelsen, Linda M.
Lee, Laurie A.
Wu, Wei
Lin, Xiwu
Murray, Lindsey
Pascoe, Steven J.
Leidy, Nancy K.
author_sort Nelsen, Linda M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (E-RS:COPD) is a patient-reported diary that assesses respiratory symptoms in stable COPD. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm trial (GSK ID: 200699; NCT02164539) assessed the structure, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the E-RS, and a separate wheeze item, for use in patients with a primary diagnosis of asthma or COPD, but with spirometric characteristics of both (fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility to salbutamol; a subset of patients referred to as spirometric asthma-COPD overlap [ACO]; N = 338). RESULTS: Factor analysis demonstrated that E-RS included Cough and Sputum, Chest Symptoms, and Breathlessness domains, with a Total score suitable for quantifying overall respiratory symptoms (comparative fit index: 0.9), consistent with the structure shown in COPD. The wheeze item did not fit the model. Total and domain scores were internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.7–0.9) and reproducible (intra-class correlations > 0.7). Moderate correlations between RS-Total and RS-Breathlessness scores were observed with St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total and Activity domain scores at baseline (r = 0.43 and r = 0.48, respectively). E-RS scores were sensitive to change when a patient global impression of change and SGRQ change scores were used to define responders, with changes of ≥ − 1.4 in RS-Total score interpreted as clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: E-RS:COPD scores were reliable, valid and responsive in this sample, suggesting the measure may be suitable for evaluating the severity of respiratory symptoms and the effects of treatment in patients with asthma and COPD that exhibit spirometric characteristics of both fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility. Further study of this instrument and wheeze in new samples of patients with ACO is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1070-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6545030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65450302019-06-04 Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap Nelsen, Linda M. Lee, Laurie A. Wu, Wei Lin, Xiwu Murray, Lindsey Pascoe, Steven J. Leidy, Nancy K. Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (E-RS:COPD) is a patient-reported diary that assesses respiratory symptoms in stable COPD. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm trial (GSK ID: 200699; NCT02164539) assessed the structure, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the E-RS, and a separate wheeze item, for use in patients with a primary diagnosis of asthma or COPD, but with spirometric characteristics of both (fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility to salbutamol; a subset of patients referred to as spirometric asthma-COPD overlap [ACO]; N = 338). RESULTS: Factor analysis demonstrated that E-RS included Cough and Sputum, Chest Symptoms, and Breathlessness domains, with a Total score suitable for quantifying overall respiratory symptoms (comparative fit index: 0.9), consistent with the structure shown in COPD. The wheeze item did not fit the model. Total and domain scores were internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.7–0.9) and reproducible (intra-class correlations > 0.7). Moderate correlations between RS-Total and RS-Breathlessness scores were observed with St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total and Activity domain scores at baseline (r = 0.43 and r = 0.48, respectively). E-RS scores were sensitive to change when a patient global impression of change and SGRQ change scores were used to define responders, with changes of ≥ − 1.4 in RS-Total score interpreted as clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: E-RS:COPD scores were reliable, valid and responsive in this sample, suggesting the measure may be suitable for evaluating the severity of respiratory symptoms and the effects of treatment in patients with asthma and COPD that exhibit spirometric characteristics of both fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility. Further study of this instrument and wheeze in new samples of patients with ACO is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1070-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-31 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6545030/ /pubmed/31151458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1070-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nelsen, Linda M.
Lee, Laurie A.
Wu, Wei
Lin, Xiwu
Murray, Lindsey
Pascoe, Steven J.
Leidy, Nancy K.
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap
title Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap
title_full Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap
title_fullStr Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap
title_full_unstemmed Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap
title_short Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap
title_sort reliability, validity and responsiveness of e-rs:copd in patients with spirometric asthma-copd overlap
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31151458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1070-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsenlindam reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap
AT leelauriea reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap
AT wuwei reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap
AT linxiwu reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap
AT murraylindsey reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap
AT pascoestevenj reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap
AT leidynancyk reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessoferscopdinpatientswithspirometricasthmacopdoverlap