Cargando…

Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey

INTRODUCTION: Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. METHODS: Fifty-seven internati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Rijswijk, A. S., Hagens, E. R. C., van der Peet, D. L., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Gisbertz, S. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9
_version_ 1783423347841826816
author van Rijswijk, A. S.
Hagens, E. R. C.
van der Peet, D. L.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Gisbertz, S. S.
author_facet van Rijswijk, A. S.
Hagens, E. R. C.
van der Peet, D. L.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Gisbertz, S. S.
author_sort van Rijswijk, A. S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. METHODS: Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling. RESULTS: The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants. CONCLUSION: There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6545175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65451752019-06-19 Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey van Rijswijk, A. S. Hagens, E. R. C. van der Peet, D. L. van Berge Henegouwen, M. I. Gisbertz, S. S. Ann Surg Oncol Thoracic Oncology INTRODUCTION: Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy are essential parts of the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma with curative intent. Treatment regimens vary globally and are subject to debate. A global survey was designed to gain insight into current practice. METHODS: Fifty-seven international expert upper gastrointestinal surgeons received a personal invitation to participate in the survey, which focused on demographics and experience; extent of lymphadenectomy in adeno and squamous cell carcinoma; use of classification systems; neoadjuvant therapy; surgical approach; and specimen handling. RESULTS: The response rate was 88% (50/57 surgeons), with a mean age of 51.6 years and a median number of 15 years of experience in esophageal surgery. The variety in the extent of lymphadenectomy in proximal, middle and distal squamous cell carcinoma, and Siewert I, II and III adenocarcinoma, was considerable. The number of different combinations of lymph node (LN) stations that were resected in the same tumor was high, while the number of surgeons who removed the exact same combination of LN stations was low. Illustrative is Siewert I adenocarcinoma, in which 27 unique combinations of LN stations were resected, with a maximum of two surgeons performing the exact same dissection. Use of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and specimen handling also show great variety among participants. CONCLUSION: There is no uniform, worldwide strategy for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy shows great variation for both histologic types. An international observational study is needed to provide evidence on the distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer and the necessary extent of lymphadenectomy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6545175/ /pubmed/30903323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Thoracic Oncology
van Rijswijk, A. S.
Hagens, E. R. C.
van der Peet, D. L.
van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.
Gisbertz, S. S.
Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
title Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
title_full Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
title_fullStr Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
title_short Differences in Esophageal Cancer Surgery in Terms of Surgical Approach and Extent of Lymphadenectomy: Findings of an International Survey
title_sort differences in esophageal cancer surgery in terms of surgical approach and extent of lymphadenectomy: findings of an international survey
topic Thoracic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrijswijkas differencesinesophagealcancersurgeryintermsofsurgicalapproachandextentoflymphadenectomyfindingsofaninternationalsurvey
AT hagenserc differencesinesophagealcancersurgeryintermsofsurgicalapproachandextentoflymphadenectomyfindingsofaninternationalsurvey
AT vanderpeetdl differencesinesophagealcancersurgeryintermsofsurgicalapproachandextentoflymphadenectomyfindingsofaninternationalsurvey
AT vanbergehenegouwenmi differencesinesophagealcancersurgeryintermsofsurgicalapproachandextentoflymphadenectomyfindingsofaninternationalsurvey
AT gisbertzss differencesinesophagealcancersurgeryintermsofsurgicalapproachandextentoflymphadenectomyfindingsofaninternationalsurvey