Cargando…

Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Among the recent modalities introduced to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) is micro-osteoperforations (MOPs), in other words, bone puncturing. The aim of this split-mouth trial was to investigate the effects of MOPs on the rate of OTM. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring bila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aboalnaga, Amira A., Salah Fayed, Mona M., El-Ashmawi, Noha A., Soliman, Sanaa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31155698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0
_version_ 1783423358869700608
author Aboalnaga, Amira A.
Salah Fayed, Mona M.
El-Ashmawi, Noha A.
Soliman, Sanaa A.
author_facet Aboalnaga, Amira A.
Salah Fayed, Mona M.
El-Ashmawi, Noha A.
Soliman, Sanaa A.
author_sort Aboalnaga, Amira A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the recent modalities introduced to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) is micro-osteoperforations (MOPs), in other words, bone puncturing. The aim of this split-mouth trial was to investigate the effects of MOPs on the rate of OTM. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring bilateral first premolar extraction and upper canine retraction with maximum anchorage were enrolled in this study. Immediately before canine retraction, three MOPs were randomly allocated to either the right or left sides. MOPs were performed using a mini-screw (1.8 mm diameter, 8 mm length) distal to the canine. Canine retraction continued for 4 months. Data were collected from monthly digital models, in addition to pre- and post-retraction maxillary CBCT images. The primary outcomes were the rate of canine retraction per month and the total distance moved by the canines. The secondary outcomes were the effect of MOPs on anchorage loss, canine root resorption, and pain. RESULTS: The mean rate of canine retraction in both sides was 0.99 ± 0.3 mm/month. The total distance moved by the canine cusp tip was greater in the MOP than the control side (mean difference 0.06 ± 0.7 mm), which was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05(. The total distances moved by the canine center and apex were significantly greater in the MOP than the control side (mean difference 0.37 ± 0.63 mm (P < 0.05) and 0.47 ± 0.56 mm (P < 0.01) respectively). Insignificant differences were detected regarding anchorage loss and root resorption between both sides (P > 0.05). Mild to moderate pain was experienced following the MOP procedure, which rapidly faded away within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-osteoperforations were not able to accelerate the rate of canine retraction; however, it seemed to facilitate root movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6545296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65452962019-06-19 Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial Aboalnaga, Amira A. Salah Fayed, Mona M. El-Ashmawi, Noha A. Soliman, Sanaa A. Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Among the recent modalities introduced to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) is micro-osteoperforations (MOPs), in other words, bone puncturing. The aim of this split-mouth trial was to investigate the effects of MOPs on the rate of OTM. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring bilateral first premolar extraction and upper canine retraction with maximum anchorage were enrolled in this study. Immediately before canine retraction, three MOPs were randomly allocated to either the right or left sides. MOPs were performed using a mini-screw (1.8 mm diameter, 8 mm length) distal to the canine. Canine retraction continued for 4 months. Data were collected from monthly digital models, in addition to pre- and post-retraction maxillary CBCT images. The primary outcomes were the rate of canine retraction per month and the total distance moved by the canines. The secondary outcomes were the effect of MOPs on anchorage loss, canine root resorption, and pain. RESULTS: The mean rate of canine retraction in both sides was 0.99 ± 0.3 mm/month. The total distance moved by the canine cusp tip was greater in the MOP than the control side (mean difference 0.06 ± 0.7 mm), which was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05(. The total distances moved by the canine center and apex were significantly greater in the MOP than the control side (mean difference 0.37 ± 0.63 mm (P < 0.05) and 0.47 ± 0.56 mm (P < 0.01) respectively). Insignificant differences were detected regarding anchorage loss and root resorption between both sides (P > 0.05). Mild to moderate pain was experienced following the MOP procedure, which rapidly faded away within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-osteoperforations were not able to accelerate the rate of canine retraction; however, it seemed to facilitate root movement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6545296/ /pubmed/31155698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Aboalnaga, Amira A.
Salah Fayed, Mona M.
El-Ashmawi, Noha A.
Soliman, Sanaa A.
Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
title Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
title_full Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
title_short Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31155698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0
work_keys_str_mv AT aboalnagaamiraa effectofmicroosteoperforationontherateofcanineretractionasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT salahfayedmonam effectofmicroosteoperforationontherateofcanineretractionasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elashmawinohaa effectofmicroosteoperforationontherateofcanineretractionasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT solimansanaaa effectofmicroosteoperforationontherateofcanineretractionasplitmouthrandomizedcontrolledtrial