Cargando…

Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine

Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can reduce it. Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goebel, Juliane, Steinmann, Joerg, Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn, Hestermann, Tobias, Nassenstein, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000321
_version_ 1783423383416864768
author Goebel, Juliane
Steinmann, Joerg
Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn
Hestermann, Tobias
Nassenstein, Kai
author_facet Goebel, Juliane
Steinmann, Joerg
Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn
Hestermann, Tobias
Nassenstein, Kai
author_sort Goebel, Juliane
collection PubMed
description Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can reduce it. Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI contrast injectors were used in combination with a standard tube system. 3–5 ml of the contrast agent/saline solution was collected from the system prior to its connection to the patients’ venous cannula in 104 consecutive patients. To test, whether a novel tube system reduces contamination, a tube system with shielded screw connections was used with the same contrast injectors and contrast agent/saline samples were collected in further 101 patients. Specimens were microbiologically analyzed. Frequencies of contamination were compared using Fisher exact test. Results: With the standard tube system, bacterial contamination was observed in 5.8% (6 out of 104 specimens). With the novel tube system, contamination was observed in 2.0% (2 out of 101 specimens, p=0.280). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common germ (5 cases) followed by Micrococcus luteus (2 cases) and Oligella ureolytica (1 case). Conclusion: Bacterial contaminations of MRI contrast injectors occurred in a non-negligible frequency especially with S. epidermidis. A trend towards reduced bacterial contamination was seen when a novel tube system with shielded screw connections was used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6545436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65454362019-06-13 Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine Goebel, Juliane Steinmann, Joerg Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn Hestermann, Tobias Nassenstein, Kai GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can reduce it. Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI contrast injectors were used in combination with a standard tube system. 3–5 ml of the contrast agent/saline solution was collected from the system prior to its connection to the patients’ venous cannula in 104 consecutive patients. To test, whether a novel tube system reduces contamination, a tube system with shielded screw connections was used with the same contrast injectors and contrast agent/saline samples were collected in further 101 patients. Specimens were microbiologically analyzed. Frequencies of contamination were compared using Fisher exact test. Results: With the standard tube system, bacterial contamination was observed in 5.8% (6 out of 104 specimens). With the novel tube system, contamination was observed in 2.0% (2 out of 101 specimens, p=0.280). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common germ (5 cases) followed by Micrococcus luteus (2 cases) and Oligella ureolytica (1 case). Conclusion: Bacterial contaminations of MRI contrast injectors occurred in a non-negligible frequency especially with S. epidermidis. A trend towards reduced bacterial contamination was seen when a novel tube system with shielded screw connections was used. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6545436/ /pubmed/31198659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000321 Text en Copyright © 2019 Goebel et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Goebel, Juliane
Steinmann, Joerg
Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn
Hestermann, Tobias
Nassenstein, Kai
Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
title Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
title_full Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
title_fullStr Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
title_short Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
title_sort bacterial contamination of automated mri contrast injectors in clinical routine
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198659
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000321
work_keys_str_mv AT goebeljuliane bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine
AT steinmannjoerg bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine
AT heintschelvonheineggevelyn bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine
AT hestermanntobias bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine
AT nassensteinkai bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine