Cargando…
Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine
Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can reduce it. Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000321 |
_version_ | 1783423383416864768 |
---|---|
author | Goebel, Juliane Steinmann, Joerg Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn Hestermann, Tobias Nassenstein, Kai |
author_facet | Goebel, Juliane Steinmann, Joerg Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn Hestermann, Tobias Nassenstein, Kai |
author_sort | Goebel, Juliane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can reduce it. Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI contrast injectors were used in combination with a standard tube system. 3–5 ml of the contrast agent/saline solution was collected from the system prior to its connection to the patients’ venous cannula in 104 consecutive patients. To test, whether a novel tube system reduces contamination, a tube system with shielded screw connections was used with the same contrast injectors and contrast agent/saline samples were collected in further 101 patients. Specimens were microbiologically analyzed. Frequencies of contamination were compared using Fisher exact test. Results: With the standard tube system, bacterial contamination was observed in 5.8% (6 out of 104 specimens). With the novel tube system, contamination was observed in 2.0% (2 out of 101 specimens, p=0.280). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common germ (5 cases) followed by Micrococcus luteus (2 cases) and Oligella ureolytica (1 case). Conclusion: Bacterial contaminations of MRI contrast injectors occurred in a non-negligible frequency especially with S. epidermidis. A trend towards reduced bacterial contamination was seen when a novel tube system with shielded screw connections was used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6545436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65454362019-06-13 Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine Goebel, Juliane Steinmann, Joerg Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn Hestermann, Tobias Nassenstein, Kai GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Aim: To quantify the frequency of bacterial contamination of the injected contrast agent/saline solution by an automated contrast injection system, and to evaluate whether usage of a novel tube system can reduce it. Methods: For bacterial contamination quantification two identical automated piston pump MRI contrast injectors were used in combination with a standard tube system. 3–5 ml of the contrast agent/saline solution was collected from the system prior to its connection to the patients’ venous cannula in 104 consecutive patients. To test, whether a novel tube system reduces contamination, a tube system with shielded screw connections was used with the same contrast injectors and contrast agent/saline samples were collected in further 101 patients. Specimens were microbiologically analyzed. Frequencies of contamination were compared using Fisher exact test. Results: With the standard tube system, bacterial contamination was observed in 5.8% (6 out of 104 specimens). With the novel tube system, contamination was observed in 2.0% (2 out of 101 specimens, p=0.280). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common germ (5 cases) followed by Micrococcus luteus (2 cases) and Oligella ureolytica (1 case). Conclusion: Bacterial contaminations of MRI contrast injectors occurred in a non-negligible frequency especially with S. epidermidis. A trend towards reduced bacterial contamination was seen when a novel tube system with shielded screw connections was used. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6545436/ /pubmed/31198659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000321 Text en Copyright © 2019 Goebel et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Goebel, Juliane Steinmann, Joerg Heintschel von Heinegg, Evelyn Hestermann, Tobias Nassenstein, Kai Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
title | Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
title_full | Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
title_fullStr | Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
title_full_unstemmed | Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
title_short | Bacterial contamination of automated MRI contrast injectors in clinical routine |
title_sort | bacterial contamination of automated mri contrast injectors in clinical routine |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198659 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goebeljuliane bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine AT steinmannjoerg bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine AT heintschelvonheineggevelyn bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine AT hestermanntobias bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine AT nassensteinkai bacterialcontaminationofautomatedmricontrastinjectorsinclinicalroutine |