Cargando…

Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?

INTRODUCTION: In Ghana, trans‐abdominal ultrasonography is the main sonographic method of prostatic volume evaluation. The examinations are done when the patient's bladder is full. However, the delay and the discomforting experiences associated with a full bladder have been well documented. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brakohiapa, Edmund K., Botwe, Benard O., Sarkodie, Benjamin D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.320
_version_ 1783423392733462528
author Brakohiapa, Edmund K.
Botwe, Benard O.
Sarkodie, Benjamin D.
author_facet Brakohiapa, Edmund K.
Botwe, Benard O.
Sarkodie, Benjamin D.
author_sort Brakohiapa, Edmund K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In Ghana, trans‐abdominal ultrasonography is the main sonographic method of prostatic volume evaluation. The examinations are done when the patient's bladder is full. However, the delay and the discomforting experiences associated with a full bladder have been well documented. In an attempt to investigate other less discomforting options, this study was undertaken to determine if sonographic transabdominal prostatic evaluations performed at urinary bladder volumes of 50–99 mL differ significantly to evaluations done at volumes of 100–199, 200–299 and 300–399 mL. METHODS: A prostatic study of adult patients was undertaken in Accra, from 2014 to 2015. Using an ultrasound machine, 79 sets of prostatic measurements were recorded at a urinary bladder volume of 50–99 mL (V1 as our reference volume), and at least one of three other urinary bladder volumes (V2 = 100–199 mL, V3 = 200–299 mL and V4 = 300–399 mL), in 66 males. Twelve of the participants had multiple sets of prostate volume measurements. SPSS was used to analyse the data. T‐test, Bland‐Altman plots and linear regression were used to compare and test for the existence of proportional biases in measurements. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in prostatic volumes recorded at V1 and V2 (P = 0.017). However, the prostatic volume differences recorded for V1/V3, and V1/V4 groups of data were all not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The limits of agreement for the set of measurements spread from approximately −29 to +18 mL for V1/V2, −48 to +36 mL for V1/V3 and −12 to +12 mL for V1/V4 variables. There was no proportional bias in the V1/V2 (P = 0.55) and V1/V4 (P = 0.463) measurements. CONCLUSION: Urinary bladder volume of 50–99 mL produces prostatic volume measurements comparable to volumes measured in patients with a full (300–399 mL), or nearly full urinary bladder (200–299 mL). A urinary bladder volume of 50–99 mL may therefore be adequate for scanning the prostate gland, and is likely to be tolerated much better by patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6545479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65454792019-06-05 Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL? Brakohiapa, Edmund K. Botwe, Benard O. Sarkodie, Benjamin D. J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: In Ghana, trans‐abdominal ultrasonography is the main sonographic method of prostatic volume evaluation. The examinations are done when the patient's bladder is full. However, the delay and the discomforting experiences associated with a full bladder have been well documented. In an attempt to investigate other less discomforting options, this study was undertaken to determine if sonographic transabdominal prostatic evaluations performed at urinary bladder volumes of 50–99 mL differ significantly to evaluations done at volumes of 100–199, 200–299 and 300–399 mL. METHODS: A prostatic study of adult patients was undertaken in Accra, from 2014 to 2015. Using an ultrasound machine, 79 sets of prostatic measurements were recorded at a urinary bladder volume of 50–99 mL (V1 as our reference volume), and at least one of three other urinary bladder volumes (V2 = 100–199 mL, V3 = 200–299 mL and V4 = 300–399 mL), in 66 males. Twelve of the participants had multiple sets of prostate volume measurements. SPSS was used to analyse the data. T‐test, Bland‐Altman plots and linear regression were used to compare and test for the existence of proportional biases in measurements. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in prostatic volumes recorded at V1 and V2 (P = 0.017). However, the prostatic volume differences recorded for V1/V3, and V1/V4 groups of data were all not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The limits of agreement for the set of measurements spread from approximately −29 to +18 mL for V1/V2, −48 to +36 mL for V1/V3 and −12 to +12 mL for V1/V4 variables. There was no proportional bias in the V1/V2 (P = 0.55) and V1/V4 (P = 0.463) measurements. CONCLUSION: Urinary bladder volume of 50–99 mL produces prostatic volume measurements comparable to volumes measured in patients with a full (300–399 mL), or nearly full urinary bladder (200–299 mL). A urinary bladder volume of 50–99 mL may therefore be adequate for scanning the prostate gland, and is likely to be tolerated much better by patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-08 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6545479/ /pubmed/30737908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.320 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brakohiapa, Edmund K.
Botwe, Benard O.
Sarkodie, Benjamin D.
Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?
title Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?
title_full Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?
title_fullStr Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?
title_full_unstemmed Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?
title_short Prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: Does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 mL?
title_sort prostatic volume determination by transabdominal ultrasonography: does accuracy vary significantly with urinary bladder volumes between 50 to 400 ml?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.320
work_keys_str_mv AT brakohiapaedmundk prostaticvolumedeterminationbytransabdominalultrasonographydoesaccuracyvarysignificantlywithurinarybladdervolumesbetween50to400ml
AT botwebenardo prostaticvolumedeterminationbytransabdominalultrasonographydoesaccuracyvarysignificantlywithurinarybladdervolumesbetween50to400ml
AT sarkodiebenjamind prostaticvolumedeterminationbytransabdominalultrasonographydoesaccuracyvarysignificantlywithurinarybladdervolumesbetween50to400ml