Cargando…

Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes

Background: During clinical clerkships students experience complex and challenging clinical situations related to problems beyond the domain of the “Medical Expert”. Workplace routine may leave little opportunity to reflect on these situations. The University of Zurich introduced a mandatory course...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bächli, Patrik, Meindl-Fridez, Claudine, Weiss-Breckwoldt, Anja Nikola, Breckwoldt, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001238
_version_ 1783423407494266880
author Bächli, Patrik
Meindl-Fridez, Claudine
Weiss-Breckwoldt, Anja Nikola
Breckwoldt, Jan
author_facet Bächli, Patrik
Meindl-Fridez, Claudine
Weiss-Breckwoldt, Anja Nikola
Breckwoldt, Jan
author_sort Bächli, Patrik
collection PubMed
description Background: During clinical clerkships students experience complex and challenging clinical situations related to problems beyond the domain of the “Medical Expert”. Workplace routine may leave little opportunity to reflect on these situations. The University of Zurich introduced a mandatory course directly after the clinical clerkship year (CCY) to work up these situations. Prior to the course each student submitted a vignette on a case he or she had perceived challenging during the CCY and which was not related to the domain of the “Medical Expert” role. In this paper we want to characterize these cases in respect to most prominent themes and related CanMEDS roles. The goal was to inform clinical supervisors about potential teaching demands during the CCY. Methods: All case vignettes submitted by a years’ cohort were analysed by three researchers in two ways: 1. for the clinical characteristics and the main theme of the underlying problem and 2. the most prominent CanMEDS roles involved. . Themes of the underlying problem were aggregated to overarching topics and subsequently to main categories by pragmatic thematic analysis. Results: 254 case vignettes covered the whole spectrum of clinical disciplines. A wide range of underlying themes could be assigned to five main categories: “communication within team” (23.2%), “communication with patients and relatives” (24.8%), “patient behavior and attitudes” (18.5%), “clinical decision making” (24.0%), and “social and legal issues” (9.4%). Most frequent CanMEDS roles were “Communicator” (26.9%) and “Professional” (23.5%). Conclusions: Cases students perceived as challenging beyond the “Medical Expert” were reported from all clinical disciplines. These were mainly related to communicational and professional issues, mirrored by the CanMEDS roles “Communicator” and “Professional”. Therefore, supervisors in clinical clerkships should put an additional teaching focus on communication and professionalism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6545608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65456082019-06-17 Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes Bächli, Patrik Meindl-Fridez, Claudine Weiss-Breckwoldt, Anja Nikola Breckwoldt, Jan GMS J Med Educ Article Background: During clinical clerkships students experience complex and challenging clinical situations related to problems beyond the domain of the “Medical Expert”. Workplace routine may leave little opportunity to reflect on these situations. The University of Zurich introduced a mandatory course directly after the clinical clerkship year (CCY) to work up these situations. Prior to the course each student submitted a vignette on a case he or she had perceived challenging during the CCY and which was not related to the domain of the “Medical Expert” role. In this paper we want to characterize these cases in respect to most prominent themes and related CanMEDS roles. The goal was to inform clinical supervisors about potential teaching demands during the CCY. Methods: All case vignettes submitted by a years’ cohort were analysed by three researchers in two ways: 1. for the clinical characteristics and the main theme of the underlying problem and 2. the most prominent CanMEDS roles involved. . Themes of the underlying problem were aggregated to overarching topics and subsequently to main categories by pragmatic thematic analysis. Results: 254 case vignettes covered the whole spectrum of clinical disciplines. A wide range of underlying themes could be assigned to five main categories: “communication within team” (23.2%), “communication with patients and relatives” (24.8%), “patient behavior and attitudes” (18.5%), “clinical decision making” (24.0%), and “social and legal issues” (9.4%). Most frequent CanMEDS roles were “Communicator” (26.9%) and “Professional” (23.5%). Conclusions: Cases students perceived as challenging beyond the “Medical Expert” were reported from all clinical disciplines. These were mainly related to communicational and professional issues, mirrored by the CanMEDS roles “Communicator” and “Professional”. Therefore, supervisors in clinical clerkships should put an additional teaching focus on communication and professionalism. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6545608/ /pubmed/31211225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001238 Text en Copyright © 2019 Bächli et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bächli, Patrik
Meindl-Fridez, Claudine
Weiss-Breckwoldt, Anja Nikola
Breckwoldt, Jan
Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
title Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
title_full Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
title_fullStr Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
title_full_unstemmed Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
title_short Challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
title_sort challenging cases during clinical clerkships beyond the domain of the “medical expert”: an analysis of students' case vignettes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001238
work_keys_str_mv AT bachlipatrik challengingcasesduringclinicalclerkshipsbeyondthedomainofthemedicalexpertananalysisofstudentscasevignettes
AT meindlfridezclaudine challengingcasesduringclinicalclerkshipsbeyondthedomainofthemedicalexpertananalysisofstudentscasevignettes
AT weissbreckwoldtanjanikola challengingcasesduringclinicalclerkshipsbeyondthedomainofthemedicalexpertananalysisofstudentscasevignettes
AT breckwoldtjan challengingcasesduringclinicalclerkshipsbeyondthedomainofthemedicalexpertananalysisofstudentscasevignettes