Cargando…
Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient
INTRODUCTION: Older patients with hip fracture have a 20% to 30% mortality rate in the year after surgery. Nonoperative care has higher 1-year mortality rates and is generally only pursued in those with an extraordinarily high surgical risk. As the population ages, more patients with hip fracture ma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319849801 |
_version_ | 1783423415474978816 |
---|---|
author | Sullivan, Nicole M. Blake, Lindsay E. George, Masil Mears, Simon C. |
author_facet | Sullivan, Nicole M. Blake, Lindsay E. George, Masil Mears, Simon C. |
author_sort | Sullivan, Nicole M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Older patients with hip fracture have a 20% to 30% mortality rate in the year after surgery. Nonoperative care has higher 1-year mortality rates and is generally only pursued in those with an extraordinarily high surgical risk. As the population ages, more patients with hip fracture may fall into this category. The orthopedic surgeon is typically the main consultant responsible for deciding between surgery and conservative management, and the reasoning behind one decision over the other is often poorly understood. We undertook a review to determine decision-making tools for surgery in high-risk patients with hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was conducted using PubMed to determine articles published using the terms palliative care, conservative care, nonoperative, hip fracture, orthopedic procedures, fracture fixation, and surgery. Our search resulted in 13 articles to review. These were further screened to determine tools for use in surgical decision-making. RESULTS: Several potential decision-making tools were found in our search. The potential tools to identify patients who would benefit from nonoperative treatment included the Palliative Performance Scale for severe dementia, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Katz Activities of Daily Living scales for prefracture immobility, a combination of clinical signs and laboratory tests to determine risk of imminent death, and the Charlson Comorbidity Score for additional serious comorbidities. No tools have been prospectively tested in a clinical setting. DISCUSSION: Evaluation of each patient using a variety of decision making tools should help the orthopedic surgeon determine which patients would be better suited to non-operative management. After determining the benefit of non-operative care, they must effectively allow the fracture to heal while ameliorating pain. Palliative care physicians can fulfill this role by providing support and symptom relief. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical decision-making for hip fracture repair in the elderly patients is not straight forward. Several tools may be helpful to the surgeon in determining who may be better suited for nonoperative care or a palliative care referral. Prospective data do not exist in these decision-making tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6545641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65456412019-06-17 Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient Sullivan, Nicole M. Blake, Lindsay E. George, Masil Mears, Simon C. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Medical Student Corner INTRODUCTION: Older patients with hip fracture have a 20% to 30% mortality rate in the year after surgery. Nonoperative care has higher 1-year mortality rates and is generally only pursued in those with an extraordinarily high surgical risk. As the population ages, more patients with hip fracture may fall into this category. The orthopedic surgeon is typically the main consultant responsible for deciding between surgery and conservative management, and the reasoning behind one decision over the other is often poorly understood. We undertook a review to determine decision-making tools for surgery in high-risk patients with hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was conducted using PubMed to determine articles published using the terms palliative care, conservative care, nonoperative, hip fracture, orthopedic procedures, fracture fixation, and surgery. Our search resulted in 13 articles to review. These were further screened to determine tools for use in surgical decision-making. RESULTS: Several potential decision-making tools were found in our search. The potential tools to identify patients who would benefit from nonoperative treatment included the Palliative Performance Scale for severe dementia, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Katz Activities of Daily Living scales for prefracture immobility, a combination of clinical signs and laboratory tests to determine risk of imminent death, and the Charlson Comorbidity Score for additional serious comorbidities. No tools have been prospectively tested in a clinical setting. DISCUSSION: Evaluation of each patient using a variety of decision making tools should help the orthopedic surgeon determine which patients would be better suited to non-operative management. After determining the benefit of non-operative care, they must effectively allow the fracture to heal while ameliorating pain. Palliative care physicians can fulfill this role by providing support and symptom relief. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical decision-making for hip fracture repair in the elderly patients is not straight forward. Several tools may be helpful to the surgeon in determining who may be better suited for nonoperative care or a palliative care referral. Prospective data do not exist in these decision-making tools. SAGE Publications 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6545641/ /pubmed/31210998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319849801 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Medical Student Corner Sullivan, Nicole M. Blake, Lindsay E. George, Masil Mears, Simon C. Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient |
title | Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient |
title_full | Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient |
title_fullStr | Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient |
title_full_unstemmed | Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient |
title_short | Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient |
title_sort | palliative care in the hip fracture patient |
topic | Medical Student Corner |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319849801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sullivannicolem palliativecareinthehipfracturepatient AT blakelindsaye palliativecareinthehipfracturepatient AT georgemasil palliativecareinthehipfracturepatient AT mearssimonc palliativecareinthehipfracturepatient |