Cargando…

The Impact of Culturing the Organ Preservation Fluid on Solid Organ Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors of culture-positive preservation fluid and their impact on the management of solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: From July 2015 to March 2017, 622 episodes of adult solid organ transplants at 7 university hospitals in Spain w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oriol, I, Sabe, N, Càmara, J, Berbel, D, Ballesteros, M A, Escudero, R, Lopez-Medrano, F, Linares, L, Len, O, Silva, J T, Oliver, E, Soldevila, L, Pérez-Recio, S, Guillem, L L, Camprubí, D, LLadó, L, Manonelles, A, González-Costello, J, Domínguez, M A, Fariñas, M C, Lavid, N, González-Rico, C, Garcia-Cuello, L, Arnaiz de las Revillas, F, Fortun, J, Aguado, J M, Jimenez-Romero, C, Bodro, M, Almela, M, Paredes, D, Moreno, A, Pérez-Cameo, C, Muñoz-Sanz, A, Blanco-Fernández, G, Cabo-González, J A, García-López, J L, Nuño, E, Carratalà, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31198815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz180
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We analyzed the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors of culture-positive preservation fluid and their impact on the management of solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: From July 2015 to March 2017, 622 episodes of adult solid organ transplants at 7 university hospitals in Spain were prospectively included in the study. RESULTS: The prevalence of culture-positive preservation fluid was 62.5% (389/622). Nevertheless, in only 25.2% (98/389) of the cases were the isolates considered “high risk” for pathogenicity. After applying a multivariate regression analysis, advanced donor age was the main associated factor for having culture-positive preservation fluid for high-risk microorganisms. Preemptive antibiotic therapy was given to 19.8% (77/389) of the cases. The incidence rate of preservation fluid–related infection was 1.3% (5 recipients); none of these patients had received preemptive therapy. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid receiving preemptive antibiotic therapy presented both a lower cumulative incidence of infection and a lower rate of acute rejection and graft loss compared with those who did not have high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid. After adjusting for age, sex, type of transplant, and prior graft rejection, preemptive antibiotic therapy remained a significant protective factor for 90-day infection. CONCLUSIONS: The routine culture of preservation fluid may be considered a tool that provides information about the contamination of the transplanted organ. Preemptive therapy for SOT recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid may be useful to avoid preservation fluid–related infections and improve the outcomes of infection, graft loss, and graft rejection in transplant patients.