Cargando…

Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoptio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jambor, Ivan, Verho, Janne, Ettala, Otto, Knaapila, Juha, Taimen, Pekka, Syvänen, Kari T., Kiviniemi, Aida, Kähkönen, Esa, Perez, Ileana Montoya, Seppänen, Marjo, Rannikko, Antti, Oksanen, Outi, Riikonen, Jarno, Vimpeli, Sanna Mari, Kauko, Tommi, Merisaari, Harri, Kallajoki, Markku, Mirtti, Tuomas, Lamminen, Tarja, Saunavaara, Jani, Aronen, Hannu J., Boström, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002813
_version_ 1783423509197750272
author Jambor, Ivan
Verho, Janne
Ettala, Otto
Knaapila, Juha
Taimen, Pekka
Syvänen, Kari T.
Kiviniemi, Aida
Kähkönen, Esa
Perez, Ileana Montoya
Seppänen, Marjo
Rannikko, Antti
Oksanen, Outi
Riikonen, Jarno
Vimpeli, Sanna Mari
Kauko, Tommi
Merisaari, Harri
Kallajoki, Markku
Mirtti, Tuomas
Lamminen, Tarja
Saunavaara, Jani
Aronen, Hannu J.
Boström, Peter J.
author_facet Jambor, Ivan
Verho, Janne
Ettala, Otto
Knaapila, Juha
Taimen, Pekka
Syvänen, Kari T.
Kiviniemi, Aida
Kähkönen, Esa
Perez, Ileana Montoya
Seppänen, Marjo
Rannikko, Antti
Oksanen, Outi
Riikonen, Jarno
Vimpeli, Sanna Mari
Kauko, Tommi
Merisaari, Harri
Kallajoki, Markku
Mirtti, Tuomas
Lamminen, Tarja
Saunavaara, Jani
Aronen, Hannu J.
Boström, Peter J.
author_sort Jambor, Ivan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoption. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The aim was to validate a previously developed unique MRI acquisition and reporting protocol, IMPROD biparametric MRI (bpMRI) (NCT01864135), in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in a multi-institutional trial (NCT02241122). IMPROD bpMRI has average acquisition time of 15 minutes (no endorectal coil, no intravenous contrast use) and consists of T2-weighted imaging and 3 separate diffusion-weighed imaging acquisitions. Between February 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, 364 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa were enrolled at 4 institutions in Finland. Men with an equivocal to high suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3–5) of PCa had 2 TBs of up to 2 lesions followed by a systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1–2) had only SB. All data and protocols are freely available. The primary outcome of the trial was diagnostic accuracy—including overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value—of IMPROD bpMRI for clinically significant PCa (SPCa), which was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 (Gleason grade group 2 or higher). In total, 338 (338/364, 93%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial. The accuracy and NPV of IMPROD bpMRI for SPCa were 70% (113/161) and 95% (71/75) (95% CI 87%–98%), respectively. Restricting the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 22% (75/338) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy while missing 4 (3%, 4/146) men with SPCa. The main limitation is uncertainty about the true PCa prevalence in the study cohort, since some of the men may have PCa despite having negative biopsy findings. CONCLUSIONS: IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV for SPCa in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in this prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02241122.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6546206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65462062019-06-17 Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial Jambor, Ivan Verho, Janne Ettala, Otto Knaapila, Juha Taimen, Pekka Syvänen, Kari T. Kiviniemi, Aida Kähkönen, Esa Perez, Ileana Montoya Seppänen, Marjo Rannikko, Antti Oksanen, Outi Riikonen, Jarno Vimpeli, Sanna Mari Kauko, Tommi Merisaari, Harri Kallajoki, Markku Mirtti, Tuomas Lamminen, Tarja Saunavaara, Jani Aronen, Hannu J. Boström, Peter J. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoption. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The aim was to validate a previously developed unique MRI acquisition and reporting protocol, IMPROD biparametric MRI (bpMRI) (NCT01864135), in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in a multi-institutional trial (NCT02241122). IMPROD bpMRI has average acquisition time of 15 minutes (no endorectal coil, no intravenous contrast use) and consists of T2-weighted imaging and 3 separate diffusion-weighed imaging acquisitions. Between February 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, 364 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa were enrolled at 4 institutions in Finland. Men with an equivocal to high suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3–5) of PCa had 2 TBs of up to 2 lesions followed by a systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1–2) had only SB. All data and protocols are freely available. The primary outcome of the trial was diagnostic accuracy—including overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value—of IMPROD bpMRI for clinically significant PCa (SPCa), which was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 (Gleason grade group 2 or higher). In total, 338 (338/364, 93%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial. The accuracy and NPV of IMPROD bpMRI for SPCa were 70% (113/161) and 95% (71/75) (95% CI 87%–98%), respectively. Restricting the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 22% (75/338) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy while missing 4 (3%, 4/146) men with SPCa. The main limitation is uncertainty about the true PCa prevalence in the study cohort, since some of the men may have PCa despite having negative biopsy findings. CONCLUSIONS: IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV for SPCa in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in this prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02241122. Public Library of Science 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6546206/ /pubmed/31158230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002813 Text en © 2019 Jambor et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jambor, Ivan
Verho, Janne
Ettala, Otto
Knaapila, Juha
Taimen, Pekka
Syvänen, Kari T.
Kiviniemi, Aida
Kähkönen, Esa
Perez, Ileana Montoya
Seppänen, Marjo
Rannikko, Antti
Oksanen, Outi
Riikonen, Jarno
Vimpeli, Sanna Mari
Kauko, Tommi
Merisaari, Harri
Kallajoki, Markku
Mirtti, Tuomas
Lamminen, Tarja
Saunavaara, Jani
Aronen, Hannu J.
Boström, Peter J.
Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial
title Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial
title_full Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial
title_fullStr Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial
title_full_unstemmed Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial
title_short Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial
title_sort validation of improd biparametric mri in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: a prospective multi-institutional trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002813
work_keys_str_mv AT jamborivan validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT verhojanne validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT ettalaotto validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT knaapilajuha validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT taimenpekka validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT syvanenkarit validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT kiviniemiaida validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT kahkonenesa validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT perezileanamontoya validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT seppanenmarjo validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT rannikkoantti validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT oksanenouti validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT riikonenjarno validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT vimpelisannamari validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT kaukotommi validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT merisaariharri validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT kallajokimarkku validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT mirttituomas validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT lamminentarja validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT saunavaarajani validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT aronenhannuj validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial
AT bostrompeterj validationofimprodbiparametricmriinmenwithclinicallysuspectedprostatecanceraprospectivemultiinstitutionaltrial