Cargando…
Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs
AIMS: The advent of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and limited effectiveness of prevention have generated interest in “Treatment as Prevention” (TasP), in which those most likely to transmit HCV (i.e. people who inject drugs [PWID]) are treated to reduced secondary transmission...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217471 |
_version_ | 1783423512997789696 |
---|---|
author | Coffin, Phillip O. Santos, Glenn-Milo Behar, Emily Hern, Jaclyn Walker, John Matheson, Tim Kinnard, Elizabeth N. Silvis, Janelle Vittinghoff, Eric Fox, Rena Page, Kimberley |
author_facet | Coffin, Phillip O. Santos, Glenn-Milo Behar, Emily Hern, Jaclyn Walker, John Matheson, Tim Kinnard, Elizabeth N. Silvis, Janelle Vittinghoff, Eric Fox, Rena Page, Kimberley |
author_sort | Coffin, Phillip O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The advent of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and limited effectiveness of prevention have generated interest in “Treatment as Prevention” (TasP), in which those most likely to transmit HCV (i.e. people who inject drugs [PWID]) are treated to reduced secondary transmission. However, there are scant data regarding the feasibility of treating PWID at high risk for secondary transmission or the optimal approach to treatment delivery. METHODS: We conducted a 2:1 randomized trial of modified directly-observed (mDOT) versus unobserved HCV treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir daily for 8 weeks among PWID with 36 weeks of follow-up in San Francisco from 2015–2017. We evaluated recruitment-enrollment, treatment completion, end-of-treatment and 12-week response, and reinfection rate. RESULTS: Of 83 individuals eligible for screening, 72 (87.6%) attended the screening visit, 33 were eligible, and 31 enrolled; mean age was 42 years, 81% were male, 74% white. All but one participant (in the mDOT arm) completed treatment and 89.4% of mDOT and 96.6% of unobserved arm visits were attended. HCV was undetectable for 96.8% (30/31) at end of treatment and 89.7% (26/29) 12 weeks later (1 relapse, 1 reinfection), with no differences by arm. Two additional reinfections were subsequently identified, for a reinfection rate of 16.3 (95% CI 5.3–50.5) per 100 person-years of observation. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to recruit active PWID for HCV treatment and achieve high retention, viral response, and satisfaction with either mDOT or unobserved protocols, supporting treatment of PWID at risk of transmitting HCV to others. The reinfection rate suggests we successfully reached a high-risk population and that successful HCV TasP initiatives may aim to be sufficient in scope to significantly lower prevalence in the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02609893. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6546233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65462332019-06-17 Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs Coffin, Phillip O. Santos, Glenn-Milo Behar, Emily Hern, Jaclyn Walker, John Matheson, Tim Kinnard, Elizabeth N. Silvis, Janelle Vittinghoff, Eric Fox, Rena Page, Kimberley PLoS One Research Article AIMS: The advent of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and limited effectiveness of prevention have generated interest in “Treatment as Prevention” (TasP), in which those most likely to transmit HCV (i.e. people who inject drugs [PWID]) are treated to reduced secondary transmission. However, there are scant data regarding the feasibility of treating PWID at high risk for secondary transmission or the optimal approach to treatment delivery. METHODS: We conducted a 2:1 randomized trial of modified directly-observed (mDOT) versus unobserved HCV treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir daily for 8 weeks among PWID with 36 weeks of follow-up in San Francisco from 2015–2017. We evaluated recruitment-enrollment, treatment completion, end-of-treatment and 12-week response, and reinfection rate. RESULTS: Of 83 individuals eligible for screening, 72 (87.6%) attended the screening visit, 33 were eligible, and 31 enrolled; mean age was 42 years, 81% were male, 74% white. All but one participant (in the mDOT arm) completed treatment and 89.4% of mDOT and 96.6% of unobserved arm visits were attended. HCV was undetectable for 96.8% (30/31) at end of treatment and 89.7% (26/29) 12 weeks later (1 relapse, 1 reinfection), with no differences by arm. Two additional reinfections were subsequently identified, for a reinfection rate of 16.3 (95% CI 5.3–50.5) per 100 person-years of observation. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to recruit active PWID for HCV treatment and achieve high retention, viral response, and satisfaction with either mDOT or unobserved protocols, supporting treatment of PWID at risk of transmitting HCV to others. The reinfection rate suggests we successfully reached a high-risk population and that successful HCV TasP initiatives may aim to be sufficient in scope to significantly lower prevalence in the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02609893. Public Library of Science 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6546233/ /pubmed/31158245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217471 Text en © 2019 Coffin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Coffin, Phillip O. Santos, Glenn-Milo Behar, Emily Hern, Jaclyn Walker, John Matheson, Tim Kinnard, Elizabeth N. Silvis, Janelle Vittinghoff, Eric Fox, Rena Page, Kimberley Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
title | Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
title_full | Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
title_fullStr | Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
title_short | Randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis C treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
title_sort | randomized feasibility trial of directly observed versus unobserved hepatitis c treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir among people who inject drugs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coffinphillipo randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT santosglennmilo randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT beharemily randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT hernjaclyn randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT walkerjohn randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT mathesontim randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT kinnardelizabethn randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT silvisjanelle randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT vittinghofferic randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT foxrena randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs AT pagekimberley randomizedfeasibilitytrialofdirectlyobservedversusunobservedhepatitisctreatmentwithledipasvirsofosbuviramongpeoplewhoinjectdrugs |