Cargando…

A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan

Despite the high success rates of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) in children no randomized clinical trials compare methods of placement and none describe its use in Africa. Our aim was to compare survival and cost-effectiveness of PMCs placed by conventional techniques (CT) and biological Hall techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elamin, Fadil, Abdelazeem, Nihal, Salah, Isra, Mirghani, Yousra, Wong, Ferranti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217740
_version_ 1783423527471284224
author Elamin, Fadil
Abdelazeem, Nihal
Salah, Isra
Mirghani, Yousra
Wong, Ferranti
author_facet Elamin, Fadil
Abdelazeem, Nihal
Salah, Isra
Mirghani, Yousra
Wong, Ferranti
author_sort Elamin, Fadil
collection PubMed
description Despite the high success rates of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) in children no randomized clinical trials compare methods of placement and none describe its use in Africa. Our aim was to compare survival and cost-effectiveness of PMCs placed by conventional techniques (CT) and biological Hall techniques (HT) using a prospective randomized control trial in a general dental practice from Khartoum. One hundred and nine and 103 PMCs were placed in randomly selected children (5-8years) with 1–2 carious primary molars using HT and CT respectively and followed for 2 years. Socioeconomic status, periodontal health, occlusion, anxiety, and procedure time were compared using student t-test. Kaplan–Meier survival rates and incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) were compared between CT and HT. CT and HT groups were similar for age, gender, socio-economic status. Survival rates were high (over 90%) for both study arms and not statistically different (p>0.05). Anxiety scores were significantly higher in CT arm after 12 months compared to HT (p<0.001). Clinically, gingival and plaque indices were similar between groups (p>0.05) but occlusions were raised in nearly all subjects in the HT arm (p<0.05). Periodontal health improved, and occlusions adjusted over time in both arms. There were 3 (2.7%) and 6 (5.8%) minor failures, 7 (6.4%) and 6 (5.8%) major failures in HT and CT arms respectively. Mean procedure time was lower in HT (9.1 min) than CT (33.9 min); p<0.001. Mean PMC cost was US$2.45 and US$7.81 for HT and CT respectively. The ICER was US$136.56 more for each PMC placed by CT per life year. We show that PMCs have high survival outcomes in disadvantaged populations similar to results from developed countries. As HT can be carried out by less experienced dental operators and therapists, this biological approach provides a promising cost-effective option to manage caries in developing countries with limited resources. Trial registration: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT03640013
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6546341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65463412019-06-17 A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan Elamin, Fadil Abdelazeem, Nihal Salah, Isra Mirghani, Yousra Wong, Ferranti PLoS One Research Article Despite the high success rates of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) in children no randomized clinical trials compare methods of placement and none describe its use in Africa. Our aim was to compare survival and cost-effectiveness of PMCs placed by conventional techniques (CT) and biological Hall techniques (HT) using a prospective randomized control trial in a general dental practice from Khartoum. One hundred and nine and 103 PMCs were placed in randomly selected children (5-8years) with 1–2 carious primary molars using HT and CT respectively and followed for 2 years. Socioeconomic status, periodontal health, occlusion, anxiety, and procedure time were compared using student t-test. Kaplan–Meier survival rates and incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) were compared between CT and HT. CT and HT groups were similar for age, gender, socio-economic status. Survival rates were high (over 90%) for both study arms and not statistically different (p>0.05). Anxiety scores were significantly higher in CT arm after 12 months compared to HT (p<0.001). Clinically, gingival and plaque indices were similar between groups (p>0.05) but occlusions were raised in nearly all subjects in the HT arm (p<0.05). Periodontal health improved, and occlusions adjusted over time in both arms. There were 3 (2.7%) and 6 (5.8%) minor failures, 7 (6.4%) and 6 (5.8%) major failures in HT and CT arms respectively. Mean procedure time was lower in HT (9.1 min) than CT (33.9 min); p<0.001. Mean PMC cost was US$2.45 and US$7.81 for HT and CT respectively. The ICER was US$136.56 more for each PMC placed by CT per life year. We show that PMCs have high survival outcomes in disadvantaged populations similar to results from developed countries. As HT can be carried out by less experienced dental operators and therapists, this biological approach provides a promising cost-effective option to manage caries in developing countries with limited resources. Trial registration: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT03640013 Public Library of Science 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6546341/ /pubmed/31158253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217740 Text en © 2019 Elamin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elamin, Fadil
Abdelazeem, Nihal
Salah, Isra
Mirghani, Yousra
Wong, Ferranti
A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan
title A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan
title_full A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan
title_fullStr A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan
title_short A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan
title_sort randomized clinical trial comparing hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from sudan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31158253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217740
work_keys_str_mv AT elaminfadil arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT abdelazeemnihal arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT salahisra arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT mirghaniyousra arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT wongferranti arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT elaminfadil randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT abdelazeemnihal randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT salahisra randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT mirghaniyousra randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan
AT wongferranti randomizedclinicaltrialcomparinghallvsconventionaltechniqueinplacingpreformedmetalcrownsfromsudan