Cargando…

Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial

BACKGROUND: Early clinical data showed that some patients with vasodilatory shock are responsive to low doses of angiotensin II. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in patients requiring ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min (≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup) to ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, Kealy R., Boldt, David W., McCurdy, Michael T., Busse, Laurence W., Favory, Raphael, Gong, Michelle N., Khanna, Ashish K., Chock, Stefan N., Zeng, Feng, Chawla, Lakhmir S., Tidmarsh, George F., Ostermann, Marlies
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0536-5
_version_ 1783423574729555968
author Ham, Kealy R.
Boldt, David W.
McCurdy, Michael T.
Busse, Laurence W.
Favory, Raphael
Gong, Michelle N.
Khanna, Ashish K.
Chock, Stefan N.
Zeng, Feng
Chawla, Lakhmir S.
Tidmarsh, George F.
Ostermann, Marlies
author_facet Ham, Kealy R.
Boldt, David W.
McCurdy, Michael T.
Busse, Laurence W.
Favory, Raphael
Gong, Michelle N.
Khanna, Ashish K.
Chock, Stefan N.
Zeng, Feng
Chawla, Lakhmir S.
Tidmarsh, George F.
Ostermann, Marlies
author_sort Ham, Kealy R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early clinical data showed that some patients with vasodilatory shock are responsive to low doses of angiotensin II. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in patients requiring ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min (≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup) to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 75 mmHg versus patients receiving > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min (> 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup). Data from angiotensin II-treated patients enrolled in the ATHOS-3 trial were used. RESULTS: The subgroup of patients whose angiotensin II dose was down-titrated from 20 ng kg(−1) min(−1) at treatment initiation to ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) at 30 min (79/163) had significantly lower endogenous serum angiotensin II levels and norepinephrine-equivalent doses and significantly higher MAP versus the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup (84/163). Patients in the ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup were more likely to have a MAP response at 3 h versus those in the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup (90% vs. 51%, respectively; odds ratio, 8.46 [95% CI 3.63–19.7], P < 0.001). Day 28 survival was also higher in the ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup versus the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup (59% vs. 33%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI 0.28–0.72], P = 0.0007); multivariate analyses supported the survival benefit in patients with lower angiotensin II levels. The ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup had a more favorable safety profile and lower treatment discontinuation rate than the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This prespecified analysis showed that down-titration to ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min is an early predictor of favorable clinical outcomes which may be related to relative angiotensin II insufficiency. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6546778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65467782019-06-19 Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial Ham, Kealy R. Boldt, David W. McCurdy, Michael T. Busse, Laurence W. Favory, Raphael Gong, Michelle N. Khanna, Ashish K. Chock, Stefan N. Zeng, Feng Chawla, Lakhmir S. Tidmarsh, George F. Ostermann, Marlies Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Early clinical data showed that some patients with vasodilatory shock are responsive to low doses of angiotensin II. The objective of this analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in patients requiring ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min (≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup) to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 75 mmHg versus patients receiving > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min (> 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup). Data from angiotensin II-treated patients enrolled in the ATHOS-3 trial were used. RESULTS: The subgroup of patients whose angiotensin II dose was down-titrated from 20 ng kg(−1) min(−1) at treatment initiation to ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) at 30 min (79/163) had significantly lower endogenous serum angiotensin II levels and norepinephrine-equivalent doses and significantly higher MAP versus the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup (84/163). Patients in the ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup were more likely to have a MAP response at 3 h versus those in the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup (90% vs. 51%, respectively; odds ratio, 8.46 [95% CI 3.63–19.7], P < 0.001). Day 28 survival was also higher in the ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup versus the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup (59% vs. 33%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI 0.28–0.72], P = 0.0007); multivariate analyses supported the survival benefit in patients with lower angiotensin II levels. The ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup had a more favorable safety profile and lower treatment discontinuation rate than the > 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: This prespecified analysis showed that down-titration to ≤ 5 ng kg(−1) min(−1) angiotensin II at 30 min is an early predictor of favorable clinical outcomes which may be related to relative angiotensin II insufficiency. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0536-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6546778/ /pubmed/31161442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0536-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Ham, Kealy R.
Boldt, David W.
McCurdy, Michael T.
Busse, Laurence W.
Favory, Raphael
Gong, Michelle N.
Khanna, Ashish K.
Chock, Stefan N.
Zeng, Feng
Chawla, Lakhmir S.
Tidmarsh, George F.
Ostermann, Marlies
Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial
title Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial
title_full Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial
title_fullStr Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial
title_short Sensitivity to angiotensin II dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the ATHOS-3 trial
title_sort sensitivity to angiotensin ii dose in patients with vasodilatory shock: a prespecified analysis of the athos-3 trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0536-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hamkealyr sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT boldtdavidw sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT mccurdymichaelt sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT busselaurencew sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT favoryraphael sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT gongmichellen sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT khannaashishk sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT chockstefann sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT zengfeng sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT chawlalakhmirs sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT tidmarshgeorgef sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial
AT ostermannmarlies sensitivitytoangiotensiniidoseinpatientswithvasodilatoryshockaprespecifiedanalysisoftheathos3trial