Cargando…
Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study
Background. Fragility fractures, associated with osteoporosis, are an escalating public health problem. We aim to describe sample selection, recruitment methods and reasons for non-participation in The PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study. Design and Methods. Barwon Statisti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205902 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2019.1475 |
_version_ | 1783423621222367232 |
---|---|
author | Stuart, Amanda L. Pasco, Julie A. Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L. Berk, Michael Betson, Amelia G. Bennett, Katherine E. Timney, Elizabeth N. Williams, Lana J. |
author_facet | Stuart, Amanda L. Pasco, Julie A. Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L. Berk, Michael Betson, Amelia G. Bennett, Katherine E. Timney, Elizabeth N. Williams, Lana J. |
author_sort | Stuart, Amanda L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Fragility fractures, associated with osteoporosis, are an escalating public health problem. We aim to describe sample selection, recruitment methods and reasons for non-participation in The PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study. Design and Methods. Barwon Statistical Division residents aged 20+ years, with a radiologically-confirmed fracture between June 1(st) 2012 and May 31(st) 2013, were eligible. Individuals identified as fracture cases were invited by mail to complete a questionnaire. Reasons for non-participation were documented. Logistic regression techniques were used to determine odds ratios for participation and non-participation reasons. Results. A total of 1,458 of 2,155 (67.7%) adults with fracture (48.7% men) participated. Individuals were excluded due to inability to give informed consent, death, no knowledge of fracture, or inability to be contacted. The odds of participation decreased with age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99, P=0.011) and increased among specific fracture groups [clavicle/scapula (OR 2.50, 1.30-4.68, P=0.006), forearm/humerus (OR 2.00, 1.22-3.27, P=0.006), wrist (OR 2.08, 1.31-3.32, P=0.002), hip (OR 2.12, 1.20-3.75, P=0.009), ankle (OR 1.85, 1.20-2.87, P=0.001), compared to face/skull fractures]. The odds of reporting disinterest, time constraints or personal reasons as the reason for non-participation decreased with age, whereas the odds of reporting frailty, language-related issues or illness as the reason for non-participation increased with of age [disinterest (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.98, P<0.001), time constraints (OR 0.97, 0.96-0.98, P<0.001), personal reasons (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.99, P=0.007), frailty (OR 1.12, 1.09-1.15, P<0.001), language-related issues (OR 1.02, 1.01-1.04, P<0.001), illness (OR 1.03, 1.02-1.05, P<0.001)]. Conclusions. Understanding drivers of research participation can inform study design to achieve optimal participation in health research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6547023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65470232019-06-14 Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study Stuart, Amanda L. Pasco, Julie A. Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L. Berk, Michael Betson, Amelia G. Bennett, Katherine E. Timney, Elizabeth N. Williams, Lana J. J Public Health Res Article Background. Fragility fractures, associated with osteoporosis, are an escalating public health problem. We aim to describe sample selection, recruitment methods and reasons for non-participation in The PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study. Design and Methods. Barwon Statistical Division residents aged 20+ years, with a radiologically-confirmed fracture between June 1(st) 2012 and May 31(st) 2013, were eligible. Individuals identified as fracture cases were invited by mail to complete a questionnaire. Reasons for non-participation were documented. Logistic regression techniques were used to determine odds ratios for participation and non-participation reasons. Results. A total of 1,458 of 2,155 (67.7%) adults with fracture (48.7% men) participated. Individuals were excluded due to inability to give informed consent, death, no knowledge of fracture, or inability to be contacted. The odds of participation decreased with age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-0.99, P=0.011) and increased among specific fracture groups [clavicle/scapula (OR 2.50, 1.30-4.68, P=0.006), forearm/humerus (OR 2.00, 1.22-3.27, P=0.006), wrist (OR 2.08, 1.31-3.32, P=0.002), hip (OR 2.12, 1.20-3.75, P=0.009), ankle (OR 1.85, 1.20-2.87, P=0.001), compared to face/skull fractures]. The odds of reporting disinterest, time constraints or personal reasons as the reason for non-participation decreased with age, whereas the odds of reporting frailty, language-related issues or illness as the reason for non-participation increased with of age [disinterest (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.98, P<0.001), time constraints (OR 0.97, 0.96-0.98, P<0.001), personal reasons (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.99, P=0.007), frailty (OR 1.12, 1.09-1.15, P<0.001), language-related issues (OR 1.02, 1.01-1.04, P<0.001), illness (OR 1.03, 1.02-1.05, P<0.001)]. Conclusions. Understanding drivers of research participation can inform study design to achieve optimal participation in health research. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2019-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6547023/ /pubmed/31205902 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2019.1475 Text en ©Copyright A.L. Stuart et al., 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Stuart, Amanda L. Pasco, Julie A. Brennan-Olsen, Sharon L. Berk, Michael Betson, Amelia G. Bennett, Katherine E. Timney, Elizabeth N. Williams, Lana J. Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study |
title | Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study |
title_full | Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study |
title_fullStr | Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study |
title_short | Sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the PRedictors and Outcomes of incident FRACtures (PROFRAC) study |
title_sort | sample selection and reasons for non-participation in the predictors and outcomes of incident fractures (profrac) study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31205902 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2019.1475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stuartamandal sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT pascojuliea sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT brennanolsensharonl sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT berkmichael sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT betsonameliag sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT bennettkatherinee sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT timneyelizabethn sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy AT williamslanaj sampleselectionandreasonsfornonparticipationinthepredictorsandoutcomesofincidentfracturesprofracstudy |