Cargando…
Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117339 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151 |
_version_ | 1783423660314329088 |
---|---|
author | Hamada, Koichi Kawano, Koichiro Yamauchi, Atsushi Koyanagi, Ryota Horikawa, Yoshinori Nishida, Shinya Shiwa, Yoshiki Nishino, Noriyuki Honda, Michitaka |
author_facet | Hamada, Koichi Kawano, Koichiro Yamauchi, Atsushi Koyanagi, Ryota Horikawa, Yoshinori Nishida, Shinya Shiwa, Yoshiki Nishino, Noriyuki Honda, Michitaka |
author_sort | Hamada, Koichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japanese institutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS) were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumor size was larger (21 [3–77] mm vs. 14 [3–63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), procedure time was shorter (28 [5–202] min vs. 40 [8–249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8–157.2] mm(2) /min vs. 16.2 [2.4–41.3] mm(2) /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). CONCLUSIONS: GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6547345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65473452019-06-17 Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia Hamada, Koichi Kawano, Koichiro Yamauchi, Atsushi Koyanagi, Ryota Horikawa, Yoshinori Nishida, Shinya Shiwa, Yoshiki Nishino, Noriyuki Honda, Michitaka Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japanese institutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS) were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumor size was larger (21 [3–77] mm vs. 14 [3–63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), procedure time was shorter (28 [5–202] min vs. 40 [8–249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8–157.2] mm(2) /min vs. 16.2 [2.4–41.3] mm(2) /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). CONCLUSIONS: GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019-05 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6547345/ /pubmed/31117339 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hamada, Koichi Kawano, Koichiro Yamauchi, Atsushi Koyanagi, Ryota Horikawa, Yoshinori Nishida, Shinya Shiwa, Yoshiki Nishino, Noriyuki Honda, Michitaka Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia |
title | Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia |
title_full | Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia |
title_short | Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia |
title_sort | efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal neoplasms under general anesthesia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117339 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamadakoichi efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT kawanokoichiro efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT yamauchiatsushi efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT koyanagiryota efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT horikawayoshinori efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT nishidashinya efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT shiwayoshiki efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT nishinonoriyuki efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia AT hondamichitaka efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia |