Cargando…

Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamada, Koichi, Kawano, Koichiro, Yamauchi, Atsushi, Koyanagi, Ryota, Horikawa, Yoshinori, Nishida, Shinya, Shiwa, Yoshiki, Nishino, Noriyuki, Honda, Michitaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117339
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151
_version_ 1783423660314329088
author Hamada, Koichi
Kawano, Koichiro
Yamauchi, Atsushi
Koyanagi, Ryota
Horikawa, Yoshinori
Nishida, Shinya
Shiwa, Yoshiki
Nishino, Noriyuki
Honda, Michitaka
author_facet Hamada, Koichi
Kawano, Koichiro
Yamauchi, Atsushi
Koyanagi, Ryota
Horikawa, Yoshinori
Nishida, Shinya
Shiwa, Yoshiki
Nishino, Noriyuki
Honda, Michitaka
author_sort Hamada, Koichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japanese institutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS) were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumor size was larger (21 [3–77] mm vs. 14 [3–63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), procedure time was shorter (28 [5–202] min vs. 40 [8–249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8–157.2] mm(2) /min vs. 16.2 [2.4–41.3] mm(2) /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). CONCLUSIONS: GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6547345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65473452019-06-17 Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia Hamada, Koichi Kawano, Koichiro Yamauchi, Atsushi Koyanagi, Ryota Horikawa, Yoshinori Nishida, Shinya Shiwa, Yoshiki Nishino, Noriyuki Honda, Michitaka Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japanese institutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS) were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumor size was larger (21 [3–77] mm vs. 14 [3–63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), procedure time was shorter (28 [5–202] min vs. 40 [8–249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8–157.2] mm(2) /min vs. 16.2 [2.4–41.3] mm(2) /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). CONCLUSIONS: GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019-05 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6547345/ /pubmed/31117339 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hamada, Koichi
Kawano, Koichiro
Yamauchi, Atsushi
Koyanagi, Ryota
Horikawa, Yoshinori
Nishida, Shinya
Shiwa, Yoshiki
Nishino, Noriyuki
Honda, Michitaka
Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
title Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
title_full Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
title_fullStr Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
title_short Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
title_sort efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal neoplasms under general anesthesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117339
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.151
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadakoichi efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT kawanokoichiro efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT yamauchiatsushi efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT koyanagiryota efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT horikawayoshinori efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT nishidashinya efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT shiwayoshiki efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT nishinonoriyuki efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia
AT hondamichitaka efficacyofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionofesophagealneoplasmsundergeneralanesthesia