Cargando…

LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are a key malaria control intervention, but their effectiveness is threatened by resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Some new LLINs combine pyrethroids with piperonyl butoxide (PBO), a synergist that can overcome P450-based metabolic resistance t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staedke, Sarah G., Kamya, Moses R., Dorsey, Grant, Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine, Gonahasa, Samuel, Yeka, Adoke, Lynd, Amy, Opigo, Jimmy, Hemingway, Janet, Donnelly, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3382-8
_version_ 1783423699893878784
author Staedke, Sarah G.
Kamya, Moses R.
Dorsey, Grant
Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine
Gonahasa, Samuel
Yeka, Adoke
Lynd, Amy
Opigo, Jimmy
Hemingway, Janet
Donnelly, Martin J.
author_facet Staedke, Sarah G.
Kamya, Moses R.
Dorsey, Grant
Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine
Gonahasa, Samuel
Yeka, Adoke
Lynd, Amy
Opigo, Jimmy
Hemingway, Janet
Donnelly, Martin J.
author_sort Staedke, Sarah G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are a key malaria control intervention, but their effectiveness is threatened by resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Some new LLINs combine pyrethroids with piperonyl butoxide (PBO), a synergist that can overcome P450-based metabolic resistance to pyrethroids in mosquitoes. In 2017–2018, the Ugandan Ministry of Health distributed LLINs with and without PBO through a national mass-distribution campaign, providing a unique opportunity to rigorously evaluate PBO LLINs across different epidemiological settings. METHODS/DESIGN: Together with the Ministry of Health, we embedded a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the impact of LLINs delivered in the 2017–2018 national campaign. A total of 104 clusters (health sub-districts) in Eastern and Western Uganda were involved, covering 48 of 121 (40%) districts. Using adaptive randomisation driven by the number of LLINs available, clusters were assigned to receive one of four types of LLINs, including two brands with PBO: 1) PermaNet 3.0 (n = 32) and 2) Olyset Plus (n = 20); and two without PBO: 3) PermaNet 2.0 (n = 37) and 4) Olyset Net (n = 15). We are conducting cross-sectional community surveys in 50 randomly selected households per cluster (5200 households per survey) and entomological surveillance for insecticide resistance in up to 10 randomly selected households enrolled in the community surveys per cluster (1040 households per survey) at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months after LLIN distribution. Net durability and bio-efficacy will be assessed in 400 nets withdrawn from households with replacement at 12 months. The primary trial outcome is parasite prevalence as measured by microscopy in children aged 2–10 years in the follow-up surveys. DISCUSSION: PBO LLINs are a promising new tool to reduce the impact of pyrethroid resistance on malaria control. The World Health Organization has issued a preliminary endorsement of PBO LLINs, but additional epidemiological evidence of the effect of PBO LLINs is urgently needed. The results of this innovative, large-scale trial embedded within a routine national distribution campaign will make an important contribution to the malaria control policy in Uganda and throughout Africa, where pyrethroid resistance in malaria vectors has increased dramatically. This model of evaluation could be a paradigm for future assessment of malaria control interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17516395. Registered on 14 February 2017. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TRIAL REGISTRATION DATA SET: See Additional file 1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3382-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6547536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65475362019-06-06 LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial Staedke, Sarah G. Kamya, Moses R. Dorsey, Grant Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine Gonahasa, Samuel Yeka, Adoke Lynd, Amy Opigo, Jimmy Hemingway, Janet Donnelly, Martin J. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are a key malaria control intervention, but their effectiveness is threatened by resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Some new LLINs combine pyrethroids with piperonyl butoxide (PBO), a synergist that can overcome P450-based metabolic resistance to pyrethroids in mosquitoes. In 2017–2018, the Ugandan Ministry of Health distributed LLINs with and without PBO through a national mass-distribution campaign, providing a unique opportunity to rigorously evaluate PBO LLINs across different epidemiological settings. METHODS/DESIGN: Together with the Ministry of Health, we embedded a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the impact of LLINs delivered in the 2017–2018 national campaign. A total of 104 clusters (health sub-districts) in Eastern and Western Uganda were involved, covering 48 of 121 (40%) districts. Using adaptive randomisation driven by the number of LLINs available, clusters were assigned to receive one of four types of LLINs, including two brands with PBO: 1) PermaNet 3.0 (n = 32) and 2) Olyset Plus (n = 20); and two without PBO: 3) PermaNet 2.0 (n = 37) and 4) Olyset Net (n = 15). We are conducting cross-sectional community surveys in 50 randomly selected households per cluster (5200 households per survey) and entomological surveillance for insecticide resistance in up to 10 randomly selected households enrolled in the community surveys per cluster (1040 households per survey) at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months after LLIN distribution. Net durability and bio-efficacy will be assessed in 400 nets withdrawn from households with replacement at 12 months. The primary trial outcome is parasite prevalence as measured by microscopy in children aged 2–10 years in the follow-up surveys. DISCUSSION: PBO LLINs are a promising new tool to reduce the impact of pyrethroid resistance on malaria control. The World Health Organization has issued a preliminary endorsement of PBO LLINs, but additional epidemiological evidence of the effect of PBO LLINs is urgently needed. The results of this innovative, large-scale trial embedded within a routine national distribution campaign will make an important contribution to the malaria control policy in Uganda and throughout Africa, where pyrethroid resistance in malaria vectors has increased dramatically. This model of evaluation could be a paradigm for future assessment of malaria control interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17516395. Registered on 14 February 2017. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TRIAL REGISTRATION DATA SET: See Additional file 1. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3382-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6547536/ /pubmed/31159887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3382-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Staedke, Sarah G.
Kamya, Moses R.
Dorsey, Grant
Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine
Gonahasa, Samuel
Yeka, Adoke
Lynd, Amy
Opigo, Jimmy
Hemingway, Janet
Donnelly, Martin J.
LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
title LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
title_full LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
title_fullStr LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
title_short LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP) – Impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
title_sort llin evaluation in uganda project (llineup) – impact of long-lasting insecticidal nets with, and without, piperonyl butoxide on malaria indicators in uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3382-8
work_keys_str_mv AT staedkesarahg llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kamyamosesr llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT dorseygrant llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT maitekisebuguzicatherine llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT gonahasasamuel llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT yekaadoke llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT lyndamy llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT opigojimmy llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT hemingwayjanet llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial
AT donnellymartinj llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupimpactoflonglastinginsecticidalnetswithandwithoutpiperonylbutoxideonmalariaindicatorsinugandastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrial