Cargando…

Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Higher tourniquet pressures may be associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to determine (1) whether a lower tourniquet pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) + 120 mmHg] is as effective as conventional tourniquet pressure (SBP + 150 mmHg) in providing a bloodless su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Tae Kyun, Bamne, Ankur B., Sim, Jae Ang, Park, Ji Hyeon, Na, Young Gon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2636-7
_version_ 1783423708659974144
author Kim, Tae Kyun
Bamne, Ankur B.
Sim, Jae Ang
Park, Ji Hyeon
Na, Young Gon
author_facet Kim, Tae Kyun
Bamne, Ankur B.
Sim, Jae Ang
Park, Ji Hyeon
Na, Young Gon
author_sort Kim, Tae Kyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Higher tourniquet pressures may be associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to determine (1) whether a lower tourniquet pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) + 120 mmHg] is as effective as conventional tourniquet pressure (SBP + 150 mmHg) in providing a bloodless surgical field and decreasing blood loss, and (2) whether lowering the tourniquet pressure decreases tourniquet-related complications compared to conventional inflation pressure. METHODS: One hundred and sixty knees in 124 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to either conventional (n = 80) or lower inflation pressure group (n = 80). The quality of the initial surgical field and occurrence of intraoperative blood oozing, hemoglobin drop, drained volume and calculated blood loss were assessed as efficacy variables. Safety outcome variables included post-operative pain, tourniquet site skin problems (ecchymosis, bullae, skin necrosis), and other tourniquet-related complications such as nerve palsy, venous thromboembolism, and delayed rehabilitation. RESULTS: A comparable bloodless surgical field was successfully provided in both groups (100% vs. 99%, p = 1.000). One case in the conventional pressure group and two cases in the lower pressure group showed intraoperative blood oozing (p = 1.000), which was successfully controlled after an increase of 30 mmHg in the tourniquet inflation pressure. There was no difference in the hemoglobin drop, drained volume, and calculated blood loss. The two groups did not differ in any safety outcomes such as post-operative pain, thigh complications, and other tourniquet related complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a tourniquet inflation pressure of 120 mmHg above the SBP is effective method during TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01993758) on November 25, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6547572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65475722019-06-06 Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial Kim, Tae Kyun Bamne, Ankur B. Sim, Jae Ang Park, Ji Hyeon Na, Young Gon BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Higher tourniquet pressures may be associated with an increased risk of complications. We aimed to determine (1) whether a lower tourniquet pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) + 120 mmHg] is as effective as conventional tourniquet pressure (SBP + 150 mmHg) in providing a bloodless surgical field and decreasing blood loss, and (2) whether lowering the tourniquet pressure decreases tourniquet-related complications compared to conventional inflation pressure. METHODS: One hundred and sixty knees in 124 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomly allocated to either conventional (n = 80) or lower inflation pressure group (n = 80). The quality of the initial surgical field and occurrence of intraoperative blood oozing, hemoglobin drop, drained volume and calculated blood loss were assessed as efficacy variables. Safety outcome variables included post-operative pain, tourniquet site skin problems (ecchymosis, bullae, skin necrosis), and other tourniquet-related complications such as nerve palsy, venous thromboembolism, and delayed rehabilitation. RESULTS: A comparable bloodless surgical field was successfully provided in both groups (100% vs. 99%, p = 1.000). One case in the conventional pressure group and two cases in the lower pressure group showed intraoperative blood oozing (p = 1.000), which was successfully controlled after an increase of 30 mmHg in the tourniquet inflation pressure. There was no difference in the hemoglobin drop, drained volume, and calculated blood loss. The two groups did not differ in any safety outcomes such as post-operative pain, thigh complications, and other tourniquet related complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a tourniquet inflation pressure of 120 mmHg above the SBP is effective method during TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01993758) on November 25, 2013. BioMed Central 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6547572/ /pubmed/31159799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2636-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Tae Kyun
Bamne, Ankur B.
Sim, Jae Ang
Park, Ji Hyeon
Na, Young Gon
Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial
title Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort is lower tourniquet pressure during total knee arthroplasty effective? a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31159799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2636-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaekyun islowertourniquetpressureduringtotalkneearthroplastyeffectiveaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bamneankurb islowertourniquetpressureduringtotalkneearthroplastyeffectiveaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simjaeang islowertourniquetpressureduringtotalkneearthroplastyeffectiveaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkjihyeon islowertourniquetpressureduringtotalkneearthroplastyeffectiveaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nayounggon islowertourniquetpressureduringtotalkneearthroplastyeffectiveaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial