Cargando…

Rapid Identification of Novel Psychoactive and Other Controlled Substances Using Low-Field (1)H NMR Spectroscopy

[Image: see text] An automated approach to the collection of (1)H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectra using a benchtop NMR spectrometer and the subsequent analysis, processing, and elucidation of components present in seized drug samples are reported. An algorithm is developed to compare spectr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonides, Lysbeth H., Brignall, Rachel M., Costello, Andrew, Ellison, Jamie, Firth, Samuel E., Gilbert, Nicolas, Groom, Bethany J., Hudson, Samuel J., Hulme, Matthew C., Marron, Jack, Pullen, Zoe A., Robertson, Thomas B. R., Schofield, Christopher J., Williamson, David C., Kemsley, E. Kate, Sutcliffe, Oliver B., Mewis, Ryan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00302
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] An automated approach to the collection of (1)H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectra using a benchtop NMR spectrometer and the subsequent analysis, processing, and elucidation of components present in seized drug samples are reported. An algorithm is developed to compare spectral data to a reference library of over 300 (1)H NMR spectra, ranking matches by a correlation-based score. A threshold for identification was set at 0.838, below which identification of the component present was deemed unreliable. Using this system, 432 samples were surveyed and validated against contemporaneously acquired GC–MS (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) data. Following removal of samples which possessed no peaks in the GC–MS trace or in both the (1)H NMR spectrum and GC–MS trace, the remaining 416 samples matched in 93% of cases. Thirteen of these samples were binary mixtures. A partial match (one component not identified) was obtained for 6% of samples surveyed whilst only 1% of samples did not match at all.