Cargando…

Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review

Standard treatment for localized renal pelvis and ureter cancer is surgery. Previously, the primary role of radiation therapy (RT) in cancer treatment was to control pain and hemostasis as palliative or as adjuvant therapy following surgery. In this report, we describe 5 patients with the disease tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iizumi, Takashi, Ishikawa, Hitoshi, Sekino, Yuta, Ohnishi, Kayoko, Mizumoto, Masashi, Nonaka, Tetsuo, Sakurai, Hideyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2019.1861
_version_ 1783423773476651008
author Iizumi, Takashi
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Sekino, Yuta
Ohnishi, Kayoko
Mizumoto, Masashi
Nonaka, Tetsuo
Sakurai, Hideyuki
author_facet Iizumi, Takashi
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Sekino, Yuta
Ohnishi, Kayoko
Mizumoto, Masashi
Nonaka, Tetsuo
Sakurai, Hideyuki
author_sort Iizumi, Takashi
collection PubMed
description Standard treatment for localized renal pelvis and ureter cancer is surgery. Previously, the primary role of radiation therapy (RT) in cancer treatment was to control pain and hemostasis as palliative or as adjuvant therapy following surgery. In this report, we describe 5 patients with the disease treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) as curative treatment. Between September 2009 and July 2013, 5 males with renal pelvis (n=3) or ureter (n=2) cancer were treated by PBT with hypofractionated [72.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/22 fractions] or conventional [64–66 Gy (RBE)/32–33 fractions] fractionation. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 59–85 years). Three patients were deemed unfit for surgery. Local hypofractionated PBT was performed in 2 patients with T1-2N0M0 diseases, while prophylactic lymph node irradiation using a patch irradiation technique was performed for the remaining 3 patients, who had T3-4 disease. Two patients with T3-4 disease received chemotherapy prior to definitive PBT. No serious acute or late toxicities were observed in any patient. Local tumor control was achieved in 3 patients (60%); however, distant metastases were observed in 2 patients. Four of the five patients (80%) evaluated in the present study survived for >3 years. The data is limited; however, PBT appears to be a potential option for patients with renal pelvis or ureter cancer, especially for those who are unsuitable for radical surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6547882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65478822019-07-09 Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review Iizumi, Takashi Ishikawa, Hitoshi Sekino, Yuta Ohnishi, Kayoko Mizumoto, Masashi Nonaka, Tetsuo Sakurai, Hideyuki Mol Clin Oncol Articles Standard treatment for localized renal pelvis and ureter cancer is surgery. Previously, the primary role of radiation therapy (RT) in cancer treatment was to control pain and hemostasis as palliative or as adjuvant therapy following surgery. In this report, we describe 5 patients with the disease treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) as curative treatment. Between September 2009 and July 2013, 5 males with renal pelvis (n=3) or ureter (n=2) cancer were treated by PBT with hypofractionated [72.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/22 fractions] or conventional [64–66 Gy (RBE)/32–33 fractions] fractionation. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 59–85 years). Three patients were deemed unfit for surgery. Local hypofractionated PBT was performed in 2 patients with T1-2N0M0 diseases, while prophylactic lymph node irradiation using a patch irradiation technique was performed for the remaining 3 patients, who had T3-4 disease. Two patients with T3-4 disease received chemotherapy prior to definitive PBT. No serious acute or late toxicities were observed in any patient. Local tumor control was achieved in 3 patients (60%); however, distant metastases were observed in 2 patients. Four of the five patients (80%) evaluated in the present study survived for >3 years. The data is limited; however, PBT appears to be a potential option for patients with renal pelvis or ureter cancer, especially for those who are unsuitable for radical surgery. D.A. Spandidos 2019-07 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6547882/ /pubmed/31289673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2019.1861 Text en Copyright: © Iizumi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Iizumi, Takashi
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Sekino, Yuta
Ohnishi, Kayoko
Mizumoto, Masashi
Nonaka, Tetsuo
Sakurai, Hideyuki
Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review
title Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review
title_full Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review
title_fullStr Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review
title_short Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review
title_sort proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: a report of 5 cases and a literature review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6547882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2019.1861
work_keys_str_mv AT iizumitakashi protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview
AT ishikawahitoshi protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview
AT sekinoyuta protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview
AT ohnishikayoko protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview
AT mizumotomasashi protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview
AT nonakatetsuo protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview
AT sakuraihideyuki protonbeamtherapyforrenalpelvisanduretercancerareportof5casesandaliteraturereview