Cargando…

Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion

OBJECTIVE: To compare area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in different retinal vascular layers in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study in 47 ey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werner, Jens Ulrich, Böhm, Felix, Lang, Gabriele E., Dreyhaupt, Jens, Lang, Gerhard K., Enders, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6548381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31163058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217849
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in different retinal vascular layers in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study in 47 eyes of 47 patients. FA was recorded with the Zeiss FF450plusIR camera and OCTA was obtained with the Zeiss Cirrus 5000 equipped with the AngioPlex module. Area of FAZ was graded by two independent investigators and calculated with Adobe Photoshop. Analysis for the total study population as well as subgroup analysis for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and patients with and without macular edema (ME) was performed. RESULTS: For all patients, FAZ was 0.449 mm(2) in FA, 0.496 mm(2) in OCTA superficial capillary layer (SCL) and 3.168 in OCTA deep capillary layer (DCL). In patients without ME FAZ was 0.288 mm(2) in FA, 0.342 mm(2) in OCTA SCL and 1.384 mm(2) in OCTA DCL. FAZ area measurement in patients with ME revealed 0.482 mm(2) in FA, 0.527 mm(2) in OCTA SCL and 3.554 mm(2) in OCTA DCL. CONCLUSIONS: Especially the SCL of OCTA shows a good agreement to FA in measurement of FAZ in all patients with low limits of variation in patients without ME. There were no considerable differences in BRVO and CRVO. OCTA could replace FA in FAZ area measurement in patients with RVO, especially in those without ME, achieving similar measurements whilst being non-invasive