Cargando…
Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion
OBJECTIVE: To compare area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in different retinal vascular layers in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study in 47 ey...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6548381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31163058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217849 |
_version_ | 1783423836025257984 |
---|---|
author | Werner, Jens Ulrich Böhm, Felix Lang, Gabriele E. Dreyhaupt, Jens Lang, Gerhard K. Enders, Christian |
author_facet | Werner, Jens Ulrich Böhm, Felix Lang, Gabriele E. Dreyhaupt, Jens Lang, Gerhard K. Enders, Christian |
author_sort | Werner, Jens Ulrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in different retinal vascular layers in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study in 47 eyes of 47 patients. FA was recorded with the Zeiss FF450plusIR camera and OCTA was obtained with the Zeiss Cirrus 5000 equipped with the AngioPlex module. Area of FAZ was graded by two independent investigators and calculated with Adobe Photoshop. Analysis for the total study population as well as subgroup analysis for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and patients with and without macular edema (ME) was performed. RESULTS: For all patients, FAZ was 0.449 mm(2) in FA, 0.496 mm(2) in OCTA superficial capillary layer (SCL) and 3.168 in OCTA deep capillary layer (DCL). In patients without ME FAZ was 0.288 mm(2) in FA, 0.342 mm(2) in OCTA SCL and 1.384 mm(2) in OCTA DCL. FAZ area measurement in patients with ME revealed 0.482 mm(2) in FA, 0.527 mm(2) in OCTA SCL and 3.554 mm(2) in OCTA DCL. CONCLUSIONS: Especially the SCL of OCTA shows a good agreement to FA in measurement of FAZ in all patients with low limits of variation in patients without ME. There were no considerable differences in BRVO and CRVO. OCTA could replace FA in FAZ area measurement in patients with RVO, especially in those without ME, achieving similar measurements whilst being non-invasive |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6548381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65483812019-06-17 Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion Werner, Jens Ulrich Böhm, Felix Lang, Gabriele E. Dreyhaupt, Jens Lang, Gerhard K. Enders, Christian PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in different retinal vascular layers in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study in 47 eyes of 47 patients. FA was recorded with the Zeiss FF450plusIR camera and OCTA was obtained with the Zeiss Cirrus 5000 equipped with the AngioPlex module. Area of FAZ was graded by two independent investigators and calculated with Adobe Photoshop. Analysis for the total study population as well as subgroup analysis for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and patients with and without macular edema (ME) was performed. RESULTS: For all patients, FAZ was 0.449 mm(2) in FA, 0.496 mm(2) in OCTA superficial capillary layer (SCL) and 3.168 in OCTA deep capillary layer (DCL). In patients without ME FAZ was 0.288 mm(2) in FA, 0.342 mm(2) in OCTA SCL and 1.384 mm(2) in OCTA DCL. FAZ area measurement in patients with ME revealed 0.482 mm(2) in FA, 0.527 mm(2) in OCTA SCL and 3.554 mm(2) in OCTA DCL. CONCLUSIONS: Especially the SCL of OCTA shows a good agreement to FA in measurement of FAZ in all patients with low limits of variation in patients without ME. There were no considerable differences in BRVO and CRVO. OCTA could replace FA in FAZ area measurement in patients with RVO, especially in those without ME, achieving similar measurements whilst being non-invasive Public Library of Science 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6548381/ /pubmed/31163058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217849 Text en © 2019 Werner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Werner, Jens Ulrich Böhm, Felix Lang, Gabriele E. Dreyhaupt, Jens Lang, Gerhard K. Enders, Christian Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
title | Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
title_full | Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
title_fullStr | Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
title_short | Comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
title_sort | comparison of foveal avascular zone between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal vein occlusion |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6548381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31163058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wernerjensulrich comparisonoffovealavascularzonebetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiographyinpatientswithretinalveinocclusion AT bohmfelix comparisonoffovealavascularzonebetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiographyinpatientswithretinalveinocclusion AT langgabrielee comparisonoffovealavascularzonebetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiographyinpatientswithretinalveinocclusion AT dreyhauptjens comparisonoffovealavascularzonebetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiographyinpatientswithretinalveinocclusion AT langgerhardk comparisonoffovealavascularzonebetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiographyinpatientswithretinalveinocclusion AT enderschristian comparisonoffovealavascularzonebetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiographyinpatientswithretinalveinocclusion |