Cargando…

Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) is usually the first line of healthcare supply to patients in non-urgent to critical situations and, if necessary, provides hospital admission. A dynamic system to evaluate patients and allocate priorities is necessary. Such a structure that facilitates patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein, Nejati, Amir, Hossein-Nejad, Hooman, Mousavi, Seyed-Mohammad, Sedaghat, Mojtaba, Arbab, Mona, Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172095
http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.76
_version_ 1783423956979548160
author Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein
Nejati, Amir
Hossein-Nejad, Hooman
Mousavi, Seyed-Mohammad
Sedaghat, Mojtaba
Arbab, Mona
Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram
author_facet Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein
Nejati, Amir
Hossein-Nejad, Hooman
Mousavi, Seyed-Mohammad
Sedaghat, Mojtaba
Arbab, Mona
Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram
author_sort Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) is usually the first line of healthcare supply to patients in non-urgent to critical situations and, if necessary, provides hospital admission. A dynamic system to evaluate patients and allocate priorities is necessary. Such a structure that facilitates patients’ flow in the ED is termed triage. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the validity and reliability of implementation of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system version 4 by triage nurses in an overcrowded referral hospital with more than 80000 patient admissions per year and an average emergency department occupancy rate of more than 80%. METHOD: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital and trauma center with an emergency medicine residency program. Seven participating expert nurses were asked to assess the ESI level of patients in 30 written scenarios twice within a three-week interval to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Patients were randomly selected to participate in the study, and the triage level assigned by the nurses was compared with that by the emergency physicians. Finally, based on the patients’ charts, an expert panel evaluated the validity of the triage level. RESULTS: During the study period, 527 patients with mean age of 54 ± 7 years, including 253 (48%) women and 274 (52%) men, were assessed by seven trained triage nurses. The degree of retrograde agreement between the collaborated expert panel’s evaluation and the actual triage scales by the nurses and physicians for all 5 levels was excellent, with the Cohen’s weighted kappa being 0.966 (CI 0.985–0.946, p < 0.001) and 0.813 (CI 0.856–0.769, p<0.001), respectively. The intra-rater reliability was 0.94 (p < 0.0001), and the inter-rater reliability for all the nurses was in perfect agreement with the test result (Cohen’s weighted kappa were as follows: 0.919, 0.956, 0.911, 0.955, 0.860, 0.956, and 0.868; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study findings showed that there was perfect reliability and, overall, almost perfect validity for the triage performed by the studied nurses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65491962019-06-06 Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein Nejati, Amir Hossein-Nejad, Hooman Mousavi, Seyed-Mohammad Sedaghat, Mojtaba Arbab, Mona Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram Adv J Emerg Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) is usually the first line of healthcare supply to patients in non-urgent to critical situations and, if necessary, provides hospital admission. A dynamic system to evaluate patients and allocate priorities is necessary. Such a structure that facilitates patients’ flow in the ED is termed triage. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the validity and reliability of implementation of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system version 4 by triage nurses in an overcrowded referral hospital with more than 80000 patient admissions per year and an average emergency department occupancy rate of more than 80%. METHOD: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital and trauma center with an emergency medicine residency program. Seven participating expert nurses were asked to assess the ESI level of patients in 30 written scenarios twice within a three-week interval to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Patients were randomly selected to participate in the study, and the triage level assigned by the nurses was compared with that by the emergency physicians. Finally, based on the patients’ charts, an expert panel evaluated the validity of the triage level. RESULTS: During the study period, 527 patients with mean age of 54 ± 7 years, including 253 (48%) women and 274 (52%) men, were assessed by seven trained triage nurses. The degree of retrograde agreement between the collaborated expert panel’s evaluation and the actual triage scales by the nurses and physicians for all 5 levels was excellent, with the Cohen’s weighted kappa being 0.966 (CI 0.985–0.946, p < 0.001) and 0.813 (CI 0.856–0.769, p<0.001), respectively. The intra-rater reliability was 0.94 (p < 0.0001), and the inter-rater reliability for all the nurses was in perfect agreement with the test result (Cohen’s weighted kappa were as follows: 0.919, 0.956, 0.911, 0.955, 0.860, 0.956, and 0.868; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study findings showed that there was perfect reliability and, overall, almost perfect validity for the triage performed by the studied nurses. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6549196/ /pubmed/31172095 http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.76 Text en © 2018 Tehran University of Medical Sciences This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Seyedhosseini-Davarani, Seyedhossein
Nejati, Amir
Hossein-Nejad, Hooman
Mousavi, Seyed-Mohammad
Sedaghat, Mojtaba
Arbab, Mona
Bagheri-Hariri, Shahram
Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study
title Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Outcome-Based Validity and Reliability Assessment of Raters Regarding the Admission Triage Level in the Emergency Department: a Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort outcome-based validity and reliability assessment of raters regarding the admission triage level in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172095
http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.76
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedhosseinidavaraniseyedhossein outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT nejatiamir outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT hosseinnejadhooman outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT mousaviseyedmohammad outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT sedaghatmojtaba outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT arbabmona outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy
AT bagheriharirishahram outcomebasedvalidityandreliabilityassessmentofratersregardingtheadmissiontriagelevelintheemergencydepartmentacrosssectionalstudy