Cargando…

To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule

INTRODUCTION: The Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage rule (OSR) is a clinical decision tool identified for ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in those patient above 15 years of age who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset atraumatic headache. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathan, Abdul-Sajjad, Chakarova, Eleonora, Tarique, Aamir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172091
http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.73
_version_ 1783423958609035264
author Pathan, Abdul-Sajjad
Chakarova, Eleonora
Tarique, Aamir
author_facet Pathan, Abdul-Sajjad
Chakarova, Eleonora
Tarique, Aamir
author_sort Pathan, Abdul-Sajjad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage rule (OSR) is a clinical decision tool identified for ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in those patient above 15 years of age who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset atraumatic headache. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to externally validate the OSR in a single national health service (NHS) setting in the UK and secondly, to compare it with our current practice without using a decision rule. METHOD: A retrospective review of computerized medical records was done for all patients registered with headaches from January to December 2016. The data were manually charted on a data sheet from individual patient records. Patients fulfilling the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the OSR were enrolled in the analysis. According to the OSR, if patient had any of the 6 criteria enlisted (age > 40 years, neck stiffness/pain, witnessed loss of consciousness, onset during exertion, thunderclap headache, limited neck flexion on examination), further diagnostic decision was required. All patients were followed up for 6 months on the computer system as it gets highlighted if the patient is represented again to the ED or is deceased. RESULTS: A total of 737 ED visits with acute headache were reviewed for potential eligibility. Out of these, 649 were estimated to be eligible. On excluding 485 patients that could not meet the predetermined inclusion criteria and 19 patients as per the exclusion criteria, 145 (19.7%) patients were included in the analysis. There were 5 cases of SAH, yielding an incidence of 3.4 % (95% CI 1.3 % – 8.3 %). The sensitivity for SAH was 100% (95% CI, 46.3 % - 100 %); specificity of 44.2 % (95% CI, 36 % - 53 %); positive predictive value of 6.02 % (95% CI 2.2 % - 14.1 %); and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 92.7 % - 100%). CONCLUSION: Although being poorly specific, the OSR is a highly sensitive, simple tool for ruling out SAH in alert patients with a headache in ED settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65492032019-06-06 To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule Pathan, Abdul-Sajjad Chakarova, Eleonora Tarique, Aamir Adv J Emerg Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage rule (OSR) is a clinical decision tool identified for ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in those patient above 15 years of age who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset atraumatic headache. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to externally validate the OSR in a single national health service (NHS) setting in the UK and secondly, to compare it with our current practice without using a decision rule. METHOD: A retrospective review of computerized medical records was done for all patients registered with headaches from January to December 2016. The data were manually charted on a data sheet from individual patient records. Patients fulfilling the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the OSR were enrolled in the analysis. According to the OSR, if patient had any of the 6 criteria enlisted (age > 40 years, neck stiffness/pain, witnessed loss of consciousness, onset during exertion, thunderclap headache, limited neck flexion on examination), further diagnostic decision was required. All patients were followed up for 6 months on the computer system as it gets highlighted if the patient is represented again to the ED or is deceased. RESULTS: A total of 737 ED visits with acute headache were reviewed for potential eligibility. Out of these, 649 were estimated to be eligible. On excluding 485 patients that could not meet the predetermined inclusion criteria and 19 patients as per the exclusion criteria, 145 (19.7%) patients were included in the analysis. There were 5 cases of SAH, yielding an incidence of 3.4 % (95% CI 1.3 % – 8.3 %). The sensitivity for SAH was 100% (95% CI, 46.3 % - 100 %); specificity of 44.2 % (95% CI, 36 % - 53 %); positive predictive value of 6.02 % (95% CI 2.2 % - 14.1 %); and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 92.7 % - 100%). CONCLUSION: Although being poorly specific, the OSR is a highly sensitive, simple tool for ruling out SAH in alert patients with a headache in ED settings. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6549203/ /pubmed/31172091 http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.73 Text en © 2018 Tehran University of Medical Sciences This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Pathan, Abdul-Sajjad
Chakarova, Eleonora
Tarique, Aamir
To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
title To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
title_full To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
title_fullStr To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
title_full_unstemmed To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
title_short To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule
title_sort to head ct scan or not: the clinical quandary in suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage; a validation study on ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172091
http://dx.doi.org/10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.73
work_keys_str_mv AT pathanabdulsajjad toheadctscanornottheclinicalquandaryinsuspectedsubarachnoidhemorrhageavalidationstudyonottawasubarachnoidhemorrhagerule
AT chakarovaeleonora toheadctscanornottheclinicalquandaryinsuspectedsubarachnoidhemorrhageavalidationstudyonottawasubarachnoidhemorrhagerule
AT tariqueaamir toheadctscanornottheclinicalquandaryinsuspectedsubarachnoidhemorrhageavalidationstudyonottawasubarachnoidhemorrhagerule