Cargando…

Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (DBPCTs) have confirmed the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts (DPAEs). This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of AIT using different allergens in different severity stages of rhi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mösges, Ralph, Valero Santiago, Antonio, Allekotte, Silke, Jahed, Nilufar, Astvatsatourov, Anatoli, Sager, Angelika, Sánchez-López, Jaime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31171962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0268-5
_version_ 1783423977272639488
author Mösges, Ralph
Valero Santiago, Antonio
Allekotte, Silke
Jahed, Nilufar
Astvatsatourov, Anatoli
Sager, Angelika
Sánchez-López, Jaime
author_facet Mösges, Ralph
Valero Santiago, Antonio
Allekotte, Silke
Jahed, Nilufar
Astvatsatourov, Anatoli
Sager, Angelika
Sánchez-López, Jaime
author_sort Mösges, Ralph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (DBPCTs) have confirmed the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts (DPAEs). This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of AIT using different allergens in different severity stages of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma in the pollen studies and asthma and rhinitis in the house dust mite studies in comparison to placebo. METHODS: We used MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and LILACS databases to review DBPCTs published until July 2016. The combined symptom and medication score (cSMS) served as primary endpoint. The total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (RCSS) and total score in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) were secondary efficacy endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were secondary safety endpoints. We assumed a random effects model with standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences as summary statistics. In a subgroup analysis, we classified the studies following the GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) and ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) guidelines for rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma severity. RESULTS: Six DBPCTs in pollen and 2 trials in house dust mites (HDM) were selected. Patients (N = 915) with intermittent or mild persistent asthma were included in 3 (37.5%) and 5 (62.5%) trials, respectively. Two (25%) HDM studies included patients with moderate persistent asthma, 4 trials patients with moderate-to-severe rhinoconjunctivitis. Treatment periods ranged from 12 to 24 months. AIT with DPAEs yielded significantly lower cSMS (SMD: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.9–2.8) and RQLQ (SMD: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–0.5) values than did placebo. An exploratory analysis of cSMS and RCSS suggested that the efficacy of AIT treatment with DPAEs was higher in trials including patients with more severe rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. A publication bias was not detected. Heterogeneity between individual studies was explained by differences in severity. Patients receiving DPAEs did not experience a significantly higher risk of local (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.86–2.79) or systemic reactions (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 0.98–3.84). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, AIT with DPAEs is effective in patients with pollen- or HDM-induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without allergic asthma and improves health-related quality of life. It does not differ significantly in safety and tolerability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13601-019-0268-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65493052019-06-06 Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mösges, Ralph Valero Santiago, Antonio Allekotte, Silke Jahed, Nilufar Astvatsatourov, Anatoli Sager, Angelika Sánchez-López, Jaime Clin Transl Allergy Review BACKGROUND: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (DBPCTs) have confirmed the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts (DPAEs). This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of AIT using different allergens in different severity stages of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma in the pollen studies and asthma and rhinitis in the house dust mite studies in comparison to placebo. METHODS: We used MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and LILACS databases to review DBPCTs published until July 2016. The combined symptom and medication score (cSMS) served as primary endpoint. The total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (RCSS) and total score in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) were secondary efficacy endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were secondary safety endpoints. We assumed a random effects model with standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences as summary statistics. In a subgroup analysis, we classified the studies following the GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) and ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) guidelines for rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma severity. RESULTS: Six DBPCTs in pollen and 2 trials in house dust mites (HDM) were selected. Patients (N = 915) with intermittent or mild persistent asthma were included in 3 (37.5%) and 5 (62.5%) trials, respectively. Two (25%) HDM studies included patients with moderate persistent asthma, 4 trials patients with moderate-to-severe rhinoconjunctivitis. Treatment periods ranged from 12 to 24 months. AIT with DPAEs yielded significantly lower cSMS (SMD: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.9–2.8) and RQLQ (SMD: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–0.5) values than did placebo. An exploratory analysis of cSMS and RCSS suggested that the efficacy of AIT treatment with DPAEs was higher in trials including patients with more severe rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. A publication bias was not detected. Heterogeneity between individual studies was explained by differences in severity. Patients receiving DPAEs did not experience a significantly higher risk of local (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.86–2.79) or systemic reactions (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 0.98–3.84). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo, AIT with DPAEs is effective in patients with pollen- or HDM-induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without allergic asthma and improves health-related quality of life. It does not differ significantly in safety and tolerability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13601-019-0268-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6549305/ /pubmed/31171962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0268-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Mösges, Ralph
Valero Santiago, Antonio
Allekotte, Silke
Jahed, Nilufar
Astvatsatourov, Anatoli
Sager, Angelika
Sánchez-López, Jaime
Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31171962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-019-0268-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mosgesralph subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT valerosantiagoantonio subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT allekottesilke subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jahednilufar subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT astvatsatourovanatoli subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sagerangelika subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sanchezlopezjaime subcutaneousimmunotherapywithdepigmentedpolymerizedallergenextractsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis