Cargando…

The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache

BACKGROUND: Process evaluation is increasingly common alongside complex randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This evaluation helps in understanding the mechanisms of impact and how the study processes were executed, and it includes any contextual factors which may have implications for the trial res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nichols, Vivien P., Ellard, David R., Griffiths, Frances E., Underwood, Martin, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Patel, Shilpa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3372-x
_version_ 1783423987183779840
author Nichols, Vivien P.
Ellard, David R.
Griffiths, Frances E.
Underwood, Martin
Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
Patel, Shilpa
author_facet Nichols, Vivien P.
Ellard, David R.
Griffiths, Frances E.
Underwood, Martin
Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
Patel, Shilpa
author_sort Nichols, Vivien P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Process evaluation is increasingly common alongside complex randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This evaluation helps in understanding the mechanisms of impact and how the study processes were executed, and it includes any contextual factors which may have implications for the trial results and any future implementation. This process evaluation is for the Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) RCT, which is evaluating an education and self-management group behavioural intervention for people with chronic headache. Chronic headache is defined as headaches which are present for 15 or more days per month. The most common types are chronic migraine and chronic tension type and medication overuse headaches. METHODS: We will use a mixed methods approach. Quantitative data will be taken from routine trial data which will help us to assess the reach of the study; i.e. did we reach those whom we expected and from where? Intervention attendance (dose received) and attrition and qualitative data will augment our understanding about reasons why people may not wish to take part in or failed to attend sessions. Interviews with intervention facilitators and trial participants will gain different perspectives on taking part in the trial. Fidelity will be assessed through listening to audio recordings for adherence to course content and competence of the facilitation of a sample of sessions. DISCUSSION: Our process evaluation will allow us to gain insight into how the trial was delivered, the obstacles and enablers encountered and the possible reasons why the interventions may or may not be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN79708100. Registered on 16 December 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3372-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65493472019-06-06 The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache Nichols, Vivien P. Ellard, David R. Griffiths, Frances E. Underwood, Martin Taylor, Stephanie J. C. Patel, Shilpa Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Process evaluation is increasingly common alongside complex randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This evaluation helps in understanding the mechanisms of impact and how the study processes were executed, and it includes any contextual factors which may have implications for the trial results and any future implementation. This process evaluation is for the Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) RCT, which is evaluating an education and self-management group behavioural intervention for people with chronic headache. Chronic headache is defined as headaches which are present for 15 or more days per month. The most common types are chronic migraine and chronic tension type and medication overuse headaches. METHODS: We will use a mixed methods approach. Quantitative data will be taken from routine trial data which will help us to assess the reach of the study; i.e. did we reach those whom we expected and from where? Intervention attendance (dose received) and attrition and qualitative data will augment our understanding about reasons why people may not wish to take part in or failed to attend sessions. Interviews with intervention facilitators and trial participants will gain different perspectives on taking part in the trial. Fidelity will be assessed through listening to audio recordings for adherence to course content and competence of the facilitation of a sample of sessions. DISCUSSION: Our process evaluation will allow us to gain insight into how the trial was delivered, the obstacles and enablers encountered and the possible reasons why the interventions may or may not be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN79708100. Registered on 16 December 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3372-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6549347/ /pubmed/31164158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3372-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nichols, Vivien P.
Ellard, David R.
Griffiths, Frances E.
Underwood, Martin
Taylor, Stephanie J. C.
Patel, Shilpa
The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
title The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
title_full The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
title_fullStr The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
title_full_unstemmed The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
title_short The CHESS trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
title_sort chess trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31164158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3372-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholsvivienp thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT ellarddavidr thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT griffithsfrancese thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT underwoodmartin thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT taylorstephaniejc thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT patelshilpa thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT thechesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT nicholsvivienp chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT ellarddavidr chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT griffithsfrancese chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT underwoodmartin chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT taylorstephaniejc chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT patelshilpa chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache
AT chesstrialprotocolfortheprocessevaluationofarandomisedtrialofaneducationandselfmanagementinterventionforpeoplewithchronicheadache