Cargando…

Tracking the Reflective Light Particles Spreading on the Cornea: An Emerging Assessment for Tear Film Homeostasis

PURPOSE: To implement an emerging noninvasive approach for assessing the dynamic tear film (TF) homeostasis. METHODS: The video records of dynamic TF from 12 healthy orthokeratology lens wearers were obtained by a clinically available TF analyzer and decomposed as image sequences. The trajectories o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Hung-Yin, Kuo, Ming-Tse, Fang, Po-Chiung, Lin, Chi-Chang, Chien, Chun-Chih, Cho, Wan-Hua, Chen, Alexander, Lai, Ing-Chou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.32
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To implement an emerging noninvasive approach for assessing the dynamic tear film (TF) homeostasis. METHODS: The video records of dynamic TF from 12 healthy orthokeratology lens wearers were obtained by a clinically available TF analyzer and decomposed as image sequences. The trajectories of TF particles were analyzed by two tracking models, the full-span model (FSM) and the fixed-duration model (FDM). FSM tracked a particle for a complete opening blink cycle, while FDM tracked 1 second of the same cycle. A power-law fitting operation [Formula: see text] was used to extract homeostasis markers based on the tracking model for each subject. RESULTS: Comparing two tracking models (N = 6), only one subject had statistical difference in averaged momentary moving speed (MMS; P = 0.0488), while none had significant difference in averaged momentary moving direction (MMD). However, both models showed good correlations in average MMS (ρ = 0.94, P = 0.0048) and MMD (ρ = 1.00, P < 0.0001) and all extracted homeostasis markers [α, β, MMS(0.1), and MMS(2.0)]. Assessing interblink reliability in these markers under FDM tracking (N = 12), only one subject in the MMS (0.1) and another subject in the MMS (2.0) were outside 95% limits of agreement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FDM is a good alternative to FSM and has tracking properties of higher efficiency and easier implementation. The homeostasis markers under FDM tracking showed a good interblink consistence; therefore this approach will be a promising method for analyzing dynamic TF homeostasis in future practice. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: FDM analytical architecture can practice the past experimental platform on a TF analyzer to obtain homeostasis markers of TF.