Cargando…

Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review

OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesise existing literature exploring the impact of relational and informational continuity of care on preferred place of death, hospital admissions and satisfaction for palliative care patients in qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods literature. DESIGN: A mixed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudson, Briony F, Best, Sabine, Stone, Patrick, Noble, Thomas (Bill)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31147362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027323
_version_ 1783424043618140160
author Hudson, Briony F
Best, Sabine
Stone, Patrick
Noble, Thomas (Bill)
author_facet Hudson, Briony F
Best, Sabine
Stone, Patrick
Noble, Thomas (Bill)
author_sort Hudson, Briony F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesise existing literature exploring the impact of relational and informational continuity of care on preferred place of death, hospital admissions and satisfaction for palliative care patients in qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods literature. DESIGN: A mixed methods rapid review. METHODS: PUBMED, PsychINFO, CINAHL were searched from June 2008 to June 2018 in order to identify original peer reviewed, primary qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research exploring the impact of continuity of care for people receiving palliative care. Synthesis methods as outlined by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group were applied to qualitative studies while meta-analyses for quantitative data were planned. OUTCOMES: The impact of interventions designed to promote continuity of care for people receiving palliative care on the following outcomes was explored: achieving preferred place of death, satisfaction with care and avoidable hospital admissions. RESULTS: 18 eligible papers were identified (11 qualitative, 6 quantitative and 1 mixed methods papers). In all, 1951 patients and 190 family caregivers were recruited across included studies. Meta-analyses were not possible due to heterogeneity in outcome measures and tools used. Two studies described positive impact on facilitating preferred place of death. Four described a reduction in avoidable hospital admissions. No negative impacts of interventions designed to promote continuity were reported. Patient satisfaction was not assessed in quantitative studies. Participants described a significant impact on their experiences as a result of the lack of informational and relational continuity. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid review highlights the impact that continuity of care can have on the experiences of patients receiving palliative care. The evidence for the impact of continuity on place of death and hospital admissions is limited. Methods for enhancing, and recording continuity should be considered in the design and development of future healthcare interventions to support people receiving palliative care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65496112019-06-21 Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review Hudson, Briony F Best, Sabine Stone, Patrick Noble, Thomas (Bill) BMJ Open Palliative Care OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesise existing literature exploring the impact of relational and informational continuity of care on preferred place of death, hospital admissions and satisfaction for palliative care patients in qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods literature. DESIGN: A mixed methods rapid review. METHODS: PUBMED, PsychINFO, CINAHL were searched from June 2008 to June 2018 in order to identify original peer reviewed, primary qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research exploring the impact of continuity of care for people receiving palliative care. Synthesis methods as outlined by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group were applied to qualitative studies while meta-analyses for quantitative data were planned. OUTCOMES: The impact of interventions designed to promote continuity of care for people receiving palliative care on the following outcomes was explored: achieving preferred place of death, satisfaction with care and avoidable hospital admissions. RESULTS: 18 eligible papers were identified (11 qualitative, 6 quantitative and 1 mixed methods papers). In all, 1951 patients and 190 family caregivers were recruited across included studies. Meta-analyses were not possible due to heterogeneity in outcome measures and tools used. Two studies described positive impact on facilitating preferred place of death. Four described a reduction in avoidable hospital admissions. No negative impacts of interventions designed to promote continuity were reported. Patient satisfaction was not assessed in quantitative studies. Participants described a significant impact on their experiences as a result of the lack of informational and relational continuity. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid review highlights the impact that continuity of care can have on the experiences of patients receiving palliative care. The evidence for the impact of continuity on place of death and hospital admissions is limited. Methods for enhancing, and recording continuity should be considered in the design and development of future healthcare interventions to support people receiving palliative care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6549611/ /pubmed/31147362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027323 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Hudson, Briony F
Best, Sabine
Stone, Patrick
Noble, Thomas (Bill)
Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
title Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
title_full Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
title_fullStr Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
title_short Impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
title_sort impact of informational and relational continuity for people with palliative care needs: a mixed methods rapid review
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31147362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027323
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonbrionyf impactofinformationalandrelationalcontinuityforpeoplewithpalliativecareneedsamixedmethodsrapidreview
AT bestsabine impactofinformationalandrelationalcontinuityforpeoplewithpalliativecareneedsamixedmethodsrapidreview
AT stonepatrick impactofinformationalandrelationalcontinuityforpeoplewithpalliativecareneedsamixedmethodsrapidreview
AT noblethomasbill impactofinformationalandrelationalcontinuityforpeoplewithpalliativecareneedsamixedmethodsrapidreview