Cargando…

Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy describes the cognitive and social skills that individuals use to access, understand and act on health information. Health literacy interventions typically take the ‘universal precautions approach’ where all consumers are presented with simplified materials. Although th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayre, Julie, Cvejic, Erin, Bonner, Carissa, Turner, Robin M, Walter, Stephen D, McCaffery, Kirsten J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028544
_version_ 1783424046872920064
author Ayre, Julie
Cvejic, Erin
Bonner, Carissa
Turner, Robin M
Walter, Stephen D
McCaffery, Kirsten J
author_facet Ayre, Julie
Cvejic, Erin
Bonner, Carissa
Turner, Robin M
Walter, Stephen D
McCaffery, Kirsten J
author_sort Ayre, Julie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health literacy describes the cognitive and social skills that individuals use to access, understand and act on health information. Health literacy interventions typically take the ‘universal precautions approach’ where all consumers are presented with simplified materials. Although this approach can improve knowledge and comprehension, its impact on complex behaviours is less clear. Systematic reviews also suggest that health literacy interventions underuse volitional strategies (such as planning) that play an important role in behaviour change. A recent study found volitional strategies may need to be tailored to the participant’s health literacy. The current study aims to replicate these findings in a sample of people who have diabetes and/or are overweight or obese as measured by body mass index, and to investigate the most effective method of allocating an action plan to a participant to reduce unhealthy snacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit approximately 2400 participants at baseline. Participants will receive one of two alternative online action plans intended to reduce unhealthy snacking (‘standard’ action plan or ‘literacy-sensitive’ action plan). Participants will be randomised to a method of allocation to an action plan: (1) random allocation; (2) allocation by health literacy screening tool or (3) allocation by participant selection. Primary outcome is self-reported serves of unhealthy snacks during the previous month. Multiple linear regression will evaluate the impact of health literacy on intervention effectiveness. The analysis will also identify independent contributions of each action plan, method of allocation, health literacy and participant selections on unhealthy snacking at 4-week follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2017/793). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international journals, conferences and updates with collaborating public health bodies (Diabetes New South Wales (NSW) & Australian Capital Territory (ACT), and Western Sydney Local Health District). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618001409268; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65496242019-06-21 Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial Ayre, Julie Cvejic, Erin Bonner, Carissa Turner, Robin M Walter, Stephen D McCaffery, Kirsten J BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Health literacy describes the cognitive and social skills that individuals use to access, understand and act on health information. Health literacy interventions typically take the ‘universal precautions approach’ where all consumers are presented with simplified materials. Although this approach can improve knowledge and comprehension, its impact on complex behaviours is less clear. Systematic reviews also suggest that health literacy interventions underuse volitional strategies (such as planning) that play an important role in behaviour change. A recent study found volitional strategies may need to be tailored to the participant’s health literacy. The current study aims to replicate these findings in a sample of people who have diabetes and/or are overweight or obese as measured by body mass index, and to investigate the most effective method of allocating an action plan to a participant to reduce unhealthy snacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit approximately 2400 participants at baseline. Participants will receive one of two alternative online action plans intended to reduce unhealthy snacking (‘standard’ action plan or ‘literacy-sensitive’ action plan). Participants will be randomised to a method of allocation to an action plan: (1) random allocation; (2) allocation by health literacy screening tool or (3) allocation by participant selection. Primary outcome is self-reported serves of unhealthy snacks during the previous month. Multiple linear regression will evaluate the impact of health literacy on intervention effectiveness. The analysis will also identify independent contributions of each action plan, method of allocation, health literacy and participant selections on unhealthy snacking at 4-week follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2017/793). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international journals, conferences and updates with collaborating public health bodies (Diabetes New South Wales (NSW) & Australian Capital Territory (ACT), and Western Sydney Local Health District). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618001409268; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6549624/ /pubmed/31142536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028544 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Ayre, Julie
Cvejic, Erin
Bonner, Carissa
Turner, Robin M
Walter, Stephen D
McCaffery, Kirsten J
Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
title Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
title_full Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
title_short Accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
title_sort accounting for health literacy and intervention preferences when reducing unhealthy snacking: protocol for an online randomised controlled trial
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028544
work_keys_str_mv AT ayrejulie accountingforhealthliteracyandinterventionpreferenceswhenreducingunhealthysnackingprotocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cvejicerin accountingforhealthliteracyandinterventionpreferenceswhenreducingunhealthysnackingprotocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bonnercarissa accountingforhealthliteracyandinterventionpreferenceswhenreducingunhealthysnackingprotocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT turnerrobinm accountingforhealthliteracyandinterventionpreferenceswhenreducingunhealthysnackingprotocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walterstephend accountingforhealthliteracyandinterventionpreferenceswhenreducingunhealthysnackingprotocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mccafferykirstenj accountingforhealthliteracyandinterventionpreferenceswhenreducingunhealthysnackingprotocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrial