Cargando…
Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review
OBJECTIVES: To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027456 |
_version_ | 1783424065274380288 |
---|---|
author | Luttropp, Karin Dozier, Mary Justo, Nahila Cornillie, Freddy Kachroo, Sumesh Govoni, Marinella Salomonsson, Stina Black, Christopher M Khalifa, Ahmed |
author_facet | Luttropp, Karin Dozier, Mary Justo, Nahila Cornillie, Freddy Kachroo, Sumesh Govoni, Marinella Salomonsson, Stina Black, Christopher M Khalifa, Ahmed |
author_sort | Luttropp, Karin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and Embase via Ovid as well as the conference databases of European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology—Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We screened records using predefined patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design criteria. Eligible studies included reports of persistence among adult IMRD patients in Europe receiving treatment with subcutaneous golimumab. Clinical trials, randomised controlled trials, literature reviews, editorials, guidelines and studies with <20 patients receiving golimumab were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Following double screening by two independent reviewers, 27 studies out of 578 identified records were selected for inclusion and subsequent data extraction. Persistence was most commonly reported at 12and 24 months; hence, pooled persistence estimates were calculated for these two time points and reported according to indication. RESULTS: Persistence ranged between 58.1% (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 75.7% (biological-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients) at 12 months; at 24 months, the range was 43% (axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 69.6% (biological-naïve PsA patients). On the basis of data from 12 studies, persistence with golimumab treatment was either significantly higher or not significantly different from other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab persistence at 24 months approximates 50%, with a lower persistence among AxSpA (43%) patients. However, as the number of studies in these populations was low, they warrant further research. In 12 studies comparing various TNFi treatments, golimumab was shown to have significantly better or equal persistence to its comparators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6549706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65497062019-06-21 Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review Luttropp, Karin Dozier, Mary Justo, Nahila Cornillie, Freddy Kachroo, Sumesh Govoni, Marinella Salomonsson, Stina Black, Christopher M Khalifa, Ahmed BMJ Open Rheumatology OBJECTIVES: To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and Embase via Ovid as well as the conference databases of European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology—Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We screened records using predefined patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design criteria. Eligible studies included reports of persistence among adult IMRD patients in Europe receiving treatment with subcutaneous golimumab. Clinical trials, randomised controlled trials, literature reviews, editorials, guidelines and studies with <20 patients receiving golimumab were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Following double screening by two independent reviewers, 27 studies out of 578 identified records were selected for inclusion and subsequent data extraction. Persistence was most commonly reported at 12and 24 months; hence, pooled persistence estimates were calculated for these two time points and reported according to indication. RESULTS: Persistence ranged between 58.1% (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 75.7% (biological-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients) at 12 months; at 24 months, the range was 43% (axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 69.6% (biological-naïve PsA patients). On the basis of data from 12 studies, persistence with golimumab treatment was either significantly higher or not significantly different from other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab persistence at 24 months approximates 50%, with a lower persistence among AxSpA (43%) patients. However, as the number of studies in these populations was low, they warrant further research. In 12 studies comparing various TNFi treatments, golimumab was shown to have significantly better or equal persistence to its comparators. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6549706/ /pubmed/31142529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027456 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rheumatology Luttropp, Karin Dozier, Mary Justo, Nahila Cornillie, Freddy Kachroo, Sumesh Govoni, Marinella Salomonsson, Stina Black, Christopher M Khalifa, Ahmed Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review |
title | Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review |
title_full | Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review |
title_short | Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review |
title_sort | real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in europe: a systematic literature review |
topic | Rheumatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31142529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luttroppkarin realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT doziermary realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT justonahila realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT cornilliefreddy realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT kachroosumesh realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT govonimarinella realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT salomonssonstina realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT blackchristopherm realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview AT khalifaahmed realworldtreatmentpersistenceofgolimumabinthemanagementofimmunemediatedrheumaticdiseasesineuropeasystematicliteraturereview |