Cargando…

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials are critical to the advancement of medical knowledge. However, the reliability of trial conclusions depends in part on consistency between pre-planned and reported study outcomes. Unfortunately, selective outcome reporting, in which outcomes reported in published manusc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jones, Christopher W, Adams, Amanda, Weaver, Mark A, Schroter, Sara, Misemer, Benjamin S, Schriger, David, Platts-Mills, Timothy F
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31154313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028694

Ejemplares similares

Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Primary outcome switching among drug trials with and without principal investigator financial ties to industry: a cross-sectional study
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers’ perceptions of clinical educational articles: a randomised controlled trial
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effect of different financial competing interest statements on readers' perceptions of clinical educational articles: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review
por: Shahzad, Rida, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Involving clinical experts in prioritising topics for health technology assessment: a randomised controlled trial
por: Cook, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
por: Gattrell, William T, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomised controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation
por: van den Broek, Ingrid V F, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

How important is randomisation in a stepped wedge trial?
por: Hargreaves, James R, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
por: Nagendran, Myura, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
por: Hays, Meredith, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Validity of sample sizes in publications of randomised controlled trials on the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: cross-sectional evaluation
por: Tulka, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Characteristics and publication fate of unregistered and retrospectively registered clinical trials submitted to The BMJ over 4 years
por: Loder, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: where, when and why?
por: Grayling, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Group sequential designs for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
por: Grayling, Michael J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Breastfeeding peer counselling for mothers of preterm neonates: protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial
por: Laborie, Sophie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Results availability and timeliness of registered COVID-19 clinical trials: interim cross-sectional results from the DIRECCT study
por: Salholz-Hillel, Maia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: some variations on the common design
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Environmental enrichment intervention for Rett syndrome: an individually randomised stepped wedge trial
por: Downs, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
por: Hemming, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available
por: Barker, D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Unequal cluster sizes in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a systematic review
por: Kristunas, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
por: Martin, James Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sedation AND Weaning In Children (SANDWICH): protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge trial
por: Blackwood, Bronagh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer reviewers
por: Wauson, Stephanie D.
Publicado: (2021)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research
por: Superchi, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting of retrospective registration in clinical trial publications: a cross-sectional study of German trials
por: Haslberger, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_2ps09bmik7csfuvb7cfh9evceq