Cargando…

Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training

Introduction: Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) as a useful bedside tool is growing. Few studies have examined residents’ attitude towards POCUS or compared POCUS image interpretation skills between residents with and without POCUS training in medical school. Material and Methods: We distributed an a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elhassan, Mohammed, Gandhi, Kevin D, Sandhu, Charnjeet, Hashmi, Mohammad, Bahl, Sameer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213943
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S198536
_version_ 1783424085502459904
author Elhassan, Mohammed
Gandhi, Kevin D
Sandhu, Charnjeet
Hashmi, Mohammad
Bahl, Sameer
author_facet Elhassan, Mohammed
Gandhi, Kevin D
Sandhu, Charnjeet
Hashmi, Mohammad
Bahl, Sameer
author_sort Elhassan, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) as a useful bedside tool is growing. Few studies have examined residents’ attitude towards POCUS or compared POCUS image interpretation skills between residents with and without POCUS training in medical school. Material and Methods: We distributed an anonymous survey and image interpretation test to assess residents’ attitude towards POCUS, confidence, and skills in interpreting POCUS images and videos. Using independent samples t-tests, we compared mean confidence levels and test scores between residents with and without prior POCUS training. Results: Fifty-two residents responded to survey (response rate 68%) and 59 took the image interpretation test (77%). Most residents (90%) reported being interested in POCUS. Residents with prior POCUS training (n=13) were either PGY-1 (9) or PGY-2 (4). No PGY-3 resident had prior training. Most residents (83%) thought POCUS could be extremely useful in the inpatient setting compared to 29% for outpatient setting. PGY-1 residents with prior training had a higher mean confidence level than PGY-1 residents without prior training, but the difference was not statistically significant (3.26 vs 2.64; p=0.08). PGY-1 with prior training had a mean confidence level that was close to that of PGY-3 residents. PGY-1 residents with prior training scored significantly higher than PGY-1 residents without prior training in image interpretation test (10.25 vs 7; p=0.01). Residents felt most confident in interpreting inferior vena cava images (mean 3.7; max. 5), which also had the highest score in image interpretation test (correct response rate of 88%). Conclusion: Our residents seem very interested in POCUS. PGY-1 residents with prior POCUS training in medical school seem to have higher confidence in their POCUS skills than PGY-1 residents without prior training and outperformed them in image interpretation test. The study is very instructive in building our future POCUS curriculum for residents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65497952019-06-18 Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training Elhassan, Mohammed Gandhi, Kevin D Sandhu, Charnjeet Hashmi, Mohammad Bahl, Sameer Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research Introduction: Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) as a useful bedside tool is growing. Few studies have examined residents’ attitude towards POCUS or compared POCUS image interpretation skills between residents with and without POCUS training in medical school. Material and Methods: We distributed an anonymous survey and image interpretation test to assess residents’ attitude towards POCUS, confidence, and skills in interpreting POCUS images and videos. Using independent samples t-tests, we compared mean confidence levels and test scores between residents with and without prior POCUS training. Results: Fifty-two residents responded to survey (response rate 68%) and 59 took the image interpretation test (77%). Most residents (90%) reported being interested in POCUS. Residents with prior POCUS training (n=13) were either PGY-1 (9) or PGY-2 (4). No PGY-3 resident had prior training. Most residents (83%) thought POCUS could be extremely useful in the inpatient setting compared to 29% for outpatient setting. PGY-1 residents with prior training had a higher mean confidence level than PGY-1 residents without prior training, but the difference was not statistically significant (3.26 vs 2.64; p=0.08). PGY-1 with prior training had a mean confidence level that was close to that of PGY-3 residents. PGY-1 residents with prior training scored significantly higher than PGY-1 residents without prior training in image interpretation test (10.25 vs 7; p=0.01). Residents felt most confident in interpreting inferior vena cava images (mean 3.7; max. 5), which also had the highest score in image interpretation test (correct response rate of 88%). Conclusion: Our residents seem very interested in POCUS. PGY-1 residents with prior POCUS training in medical school seem to have higher confidence in their POCUS skills than PGY-1 residents without prior training and outperformed them in image interpretation test. The study is very instructive in building our future POCUS curriculum for residents. Dove 2019-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6549795/ /pubmed/31213943 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S198536 Text en © 2019 Elhassan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Elhassan, Mohammed
Gandhi, Kevin D
Sandhu, Charnjeet
Hashmi, Mohammad
Bahl, Sameer
Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
title Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
title_full Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
title_fullStr Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
title_full_unstemmed Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
title_short Internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
title_sort internal medicine residents’ point-of-care ultrasound skills and need assessment and the role of medical school training
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31213943
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S198536
work_keys_str_mv AT elhassanmohammed internalmedicineresidentspointofcareultrasoundskillsandneedassessmentandtheroleofmedicalschooltraining
AT gandhikevind internalmedicineresidentspointofcareultrasoundskillsandneedassessmentandtheroleofmedicalschooltraining
AT sandhucharnjeet internalmedicineresidentspointofcareultrasoundskillsandneedassessmentandtheroleofmedicalschooltraining
AT hashmimohammad internalmedicineresidentspointofcareultrasoundskillsandneedassessmentandtheroleofmedicalschooltraining
AT bahlsameer internalmedicineresidentspointofcareultrasoundskillsandneedassessmentandtheroleofmedicalschooltraining