Cargando…

Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year

Wastewater treatment plants serve to collect and treat wastes that are known to include microplastic (MP; synthetic polymer materials <5 mm in size) and other small anthropogenic litter as particles, fibers and microbeads. Here, we determined the microplastic loads and removal efficiencies of thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conley, Kenda, Clum, Allan, Deepe, Jestine, Lane, Haven, Beckingham, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100030
_version_ 1783424086887628800
author Conley, Kenda
Clum, Allan
Deepe, Jestine
Lane, Haven
Beckingham, Barbara
author_facet Conley, Kenda
Clum, Allan
Deepe, Jestine
Lane, Haven
Beckingham, Barbara
author_sort Conley, Kenda
collection PubMed
description Wastewater treatment plants serve to collect and treat wastes that are known to include microplastic (MP; synthetic polymer materials <5 mm in size) and other small anthropogenic litter as particles, fibers and microbeads. Here, we determined the microplastic loads and removal efficiencies of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with different treatment sizes, operations and service compositions discharging to Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, USA over the course of a year. Overall, we found that MP concentrations (counts per L) varied within a factor of 2.5 in influent and 4.8 in effluent at each WWTP, and that neither concentrations nor removal efficiencies demonstrated a seasonal trend. The largest wastewater treatment plant in the study, which also employed primary clarification, had the highest MP removal efficiency of 97.6 ± 1.2%. The other two smaller facilities had average removal efficiencies of 85.2 ± 6.0% and 85.5 ± 9.1%. We demonstrate through source modeling that microplastic fiber loads in influent were consistent with service area populations laundering textiles given previously published rates of microplastic generation in washing machines. Using measured WWTP flow rates and MP counts, we find a combined load of MPs leaving all three WWTPs with discharged effluent totaling 500–1000 million MPs per day. We estimate from this the emission of 0.34–0.68 g MP per capita per year in treated wastewater, which may only account for <0.1% of plastic debris input to this metropolitan area's surface waters on an annual mass basis when land-based (mis)managed plastic waste sources are also considered. However, the potential for sorption of chemicals present in wastewater to microplastics and their small size, which confers immediate bioaccessibility, may present unique toxicological risks for microplastics discharged from WWTPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6549897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65498972019-06-11 Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year Conley, Kenda Clum, Allan Deepe, Jestine Lane, Haven Beckingham, Barbara Water Res X Full Paper Wastewater treatment plants serve to collect and treat wastes that are known to include microplastic (MP; synthetic polymer materials <5 mm in size) and other small anthropogenic litter as particles, fibers and microbeads. Here, we determined the microplastic loads and removal efficiencies of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with different treatment sizes, operations and service compositions discharging to Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, USA over the course of a year. Overall, we found that MP concentrations (counts per L) varied within a factor of 2.5 in influent and 4.8 in effluent at each WWTP, and that neither concentrations nor removal efficiencies demonstrated a seasonal trend. The largest wastewater treatment plant in the study, which also employed primary clarification, had the highest MP removal efficiency of 97.6 ± 1.2%. The other two smaller facilities had average removal efficiencies of 85.2 ± 6.0% and 85.5 ± 9.1%. We demonstrate through source modeling that microplastic fiber loads in influent were consistent with service area populations laundering textiles given previously published rates of microplastic generation in washing machines. Using measured WWTP flow rates and MP counts, we find a combined load of MPs leaving all three WWTPs with discharged effluent totaling 500–1000 million MPs per day. We estimate from this the emission of 0.34–0.68 g MP per capita per year in treated wastewater, which may only account for <0.1% of plastic debris input to this metropolitan area's surface waters on an annual mass basis when land-based (mis)managed plastic waste sources are also considered. However, the potential for sorption of chemicals present in wastewater to microplastics and their small size, which confers immediate bioaccessibility, may present unique toxicological risks for microplastics discharged from WWTPs. Elsevier 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6549897/ /pubmed/31194047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100030 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Paper
Conley, Kenda
Clum, Allan
Deepe, Jestine
Lane, Haven
Beckingham, Barbara
Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
title Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
title_full Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
title_fullStr Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
title_full_unstemmed Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
title_short Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
title_sort wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100030
work_keys_str_mv AT conleykenda wastewatertreatmentplantsasasourceofmicroplasticstoanurbanestuaryremovalefficienciesandloadingpercapitaoveroneyear
AT clumallan wastewatertreatmentplantsasasourceofmicroplasticstoanurbanestuaryremovalefficienciesandloadingpercapitaoveroneyear
AT deepejestine wastewatertreatmentplantsasasourceofmicroplasticstoanurbanestuaryremovalefficienciesandloadingpercapitaoveroneyear
AT lanehaven wastewatertreatmentplantsasasourceofmicroplasticstoanurbanestuaryremovalefficienciesandloadingpercapitaoveroneyear
AT beckinghambarbara wastewatertreatmentplantsasasourceofmicroplasticstoanurbanestuaryremovalefficienciesandloadingpercapitaoveroneyear