Cargando…
Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
OBJECTIVE: To examine the process of implementing an electronic consultation (eConsult) service and evaluate its impact along key metrics outlined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics using eConsult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028888 |
_version_ | 1783424114565840896 |
---|---|
author | Liddy, Clare Bello, Aminu Cook, Jean Drimer, Neil Pilon, Maxine Dumas Farrell, Gerard Glassford, Jodi Ireland, Laurie McDonald, Rana Nabelsi, Véronique Oppenheimer, Luis Singer, Alex Keely, Erin |
author_facet | Liddy, Clare Bello, Aminu Cook, Jean Drimer, Neil Pilon, Maxine Dumas Farrell, Gerard Glassford, Jodi Ireland, Laurie McDonald, Rana Nabelsi, Véronique Oppenheimer, Luis Singer, Alex Keely, Erin |
author_sort | Liddy, Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the process of implementing an electronic consultation (eConsult) service and evaluate its impact along key metrics outlined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics using eConsult in four provinces across Canada: Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. PARTICIPANTS: All eConsult cases submitted in four participating provinces were included. INTERVENTION: The eConsult service is a secure online application that allows primary care providers and specialists to communicate regarding a patient’s care. We measured the impact using system utilisation data and mandatory close-out surveys completed at the end of each eConsult. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation progress and impact were examined using the five categories outlined by the RE-AIM framework: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. RESULTS: Four provinces provided data from different periods, ranging from 4 years (Alberta) to 10 months (Manitoba). Total cases completed ranged from 96 (Manitoba) to 6885 (Alberta). Newfoundland had the largest menu of available specialties (n=35), while Alberta and Quebec had the smallest (n=22). The most frequently requested groups varied across provinces, with only endocrinology appearing in the top five for all provinces. The average specialist response time ranged from 3 days (Manitoba) to 16.7 days (Alberta). Between 54% (Newfoundland) and 66% (Manitoba) of cases resulted in new or additional information. Primary care providers avoided completing referrals they had originally considered in 36% (Newfoundland) to 53% of cases (Manitoba), while only between 27 % (Quebec) and 29% (Newfoundland) of cases resulted in a referral. In every province, services demonstrated higher rates of usage in their last quarter of data than their first. CONCLUSIONS: eConsult was successfully implemented in four new provinces across Canada. Implementation strategies and scope varied, but services demonstrated substantial consistency on several key metrics, most notably on whether new information was learnt and impact on decision to refer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6550029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65500292019-06-21 Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis Liddy, Clare Bello, Aminu Cook, Jean Drimer, Neil Pilon, Maxine Dumas Farrell, Gerard Glassford, Jodi Ireland, Laurie McDonald, Rana Nabelsi, Véronique Oppenheimer, Luis Singer, Alex Keely, Erin BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To examine the process of implementing an electronic consultation (eConsult) service and evaluate its impact along key metrics outlined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics using eConsult in four provinces across Canada: Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. PARTICIPANTS: All eConsult cases submitted in four participating provinces were included. INTERVENTION: The eConsult service is a secure online application that allows primary care providers and specialists to communicate regarding a patient’s care. We measured the impact using system utilisation data and mandatory close-out surveys completed at the end of each eConsult. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation progress and impact were examined using the five categories outlined by the RE-AIM framework: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. RESULTS: Four provinces provided data from different periods, ranging from 4 years (Alberta) to 10 months (Manitoba). Total cases completed ranged from 96 (Manitoba) to 6885 (Alberta). Newfoundland had the largest menu of available specialties (n=35), while Alberta and Quebec had the smallest (n=22). The most frequently requested groups varied across provinces, with only endocrinology appearing in the top five for all provinces. The average specialist response time ranged from 3 days (Manitoba) to 16.7 days (Alberta). Between 54% (Newfoundland) and 66% (Manitoba) of cases resulted in new or additional information. Primary care providers avoided completing referrals they had originally considered in 36% (Newfoundland) to 53% of cases (Manitoba), while only between 27 % (Quebec) and 29% (Newfoundland) of cases resulted in a referral. In every province, services demonstrated higher rates of usage in their last quarter of data than their first. CONCLUSIONS: eConsult was successfully implemented in four new provinces across Canada. Implementation strategies and scope varied, but services demonstrated substantial consistency on several key metrics, most notably on whether new information was learnt and impact on decision to refer. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6550029/ /pubmed/31152043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028888 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Liddy, Clare Bello, Aminu Cook, Jean Drimer, Neil Pilon, Maxine Dumas Farrell, Gerard Glassford, Jodi Ireland, Laurie McDonald, Rana Nabelsi, Véronique Oppenheimer, Luis Singer, Alex Keely, Erin Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis |
title | Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis |
title_full | Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis |
title_short | Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis |
title_sort | supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across canada: cross-sectional analysis |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liddyclare supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT belloaminu supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT cookjean supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT drimerneil supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT pilonmaxinedumas supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT farrellgerard supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT glassfordjodi supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT irelandlaurie supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT mcdonaldrana supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT nabelsiveronique supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT oppenheimerluis supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT singeralex supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis AT keelyerin supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis |