Cargando…

Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVE: To examine the process of implementing an electronic consultation (eConsult) service and evaluate its impact along key metrics outlined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics using eConsult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liddy, Clare, Bello, Aminu, Cook, Jean, Drimer, Neil, Pilon, Maxine Dumas, Farrell, Gerard, Glassford, Jodi, Ireland, Laurie, McDonald, Rana, Nabelsi, Véronique, Oppenheimer, Luis, Singer, Alex, Keely, Erin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028888
_version_ 1783424114565840896
author Liddy, Clare
Bello, Aminu
Cook, Jean
Drimer, Neil
Pilon, Maxine Dumas
Farrell, Gerard
Glassford, Jodi
Ireland, Laurie
McDonald, Rana
Nabelsi, Véronique
Oppenheimer, Luis
Singer, Alex
Keely, Erin
author_facet Liddy, Clare
Bello, Aminu
Cook, Jean
Drimer, Neil
Pilon, Maxine Dumas
Farrell, Gerard
Glassford, Jodi
Ireland, Laurie
McDonald, Rana
Nabelsi, Véronique
Oppenheimer, Luis
Singer, Alex
Keely, Erin
author_sort Liddy, Clare
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the process of implementing an electronic consultation (eConsult) service and evaluate its impact along key metrics outlined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics using eConsult in four provinces across Canada: Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. PARTICIPANTS: All eConsult cases submitted in four participating provinces were included. INTERVENTION: The eConsult service is a secure online application that allows primary care providers and specialists to communicate regarding a patient’s care. We measured the impact using system utilisation data and mandatory close-out surveys completed at the end of each eConsult. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation progress and impact were examined using the five categories outlined by the RE-AIM framework: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. RESULTS: Four provinces provided data from different periods, ranging from 4 years (Alberta) to 10 months (Manitoba). Total cases completed ranged from 96 (Manitoba) to 6885 (Alberta). Newfoundland had the largest menu of available specialties (n=35), while Alberta and Quebec had the smallest (n=22). The most frequently requested groups varied across provinces, with only endocrinology appearing in the top five for all provinces. The average specialist response time ranged from 3 days (Manitoba) to 16.7 days (Alberta). Between 54% (Newfoundland) and 66% (Manitoba) of cases resulted in new or additional information. Primary care providers avoided completing referrals they had originally considered in 36% (Newfoundland) to 53% of cases (Manitoba), while only between 27 % (Quebec) and 29% (Newfoundland) of cases resulted in a referral. In every province, services demonstrated higher rates of usage in their last quarter of data than their first. CONCLUSIONS: eConsult was successfully implemented in four new provinces across Canada. Implementation strategies and scope varied, but services demonstrated substantial consistency on several key metrics, most notably on whether new information was learnt and impact on decision to refer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6550029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65500292019-06-21 Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis Liddy, Clare Bello, Aminu Cook, Jean Drimer, Neil Pilon, Maxine Dumas Farrell, Gerard Glassford, Jodi Ireland, Laurie McDonald, Rana Nabelsi, Véronique Oppenheimer, Luis Singer, Alex Keely, Erin BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To examine the process of implementing an electronic consultation (eConsult) service and evaluate its impact along key metrics outlined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinics using eConsult in four provinces across Canada: Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. PARTICIPANTS: All eConsult cases submitted in four participating provinces were included. INTERVENTION: The eConsult service is a secure online application that allows primary care providers and specialists to communicate regarding a patient’s care. We measured the impact using system utilisation data and mandatory close-out surveys completed at the end of each eConsult. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation progress and impact were examined using the five categories outlined by the RE-AIM framework: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. RESULTS: Four provinces provided data from different periods, ranging from 4 years (Alberta) to 10 months (Manitoba). Total cases completed ranged from 96 (Manitoba) to 6885 (Alberta). Newfoundland had the largest menu of available specialties (n=35), while Alberta and Quebec had the smallest (n=22). The most frequently requested groups varied across provinces, with only endocrinology appearing in the top five for all provinces. The average specialist response time ranged from 3 days (Manitoba) to 16.7 days (Alberta). Between 54% (Newfoundland) and 66% (Manitoba) of cases resulted in new or additional information. Primary care providers avoided completing referrals they had originally considered in 36% (Newfoundland) to 53% of cases (Manitoba), while only between 27 % (Quebec) and 29% (Newfoundland) of cases resulted in a referral. In every province, services demonstrated higher rates of usage in their last quarter of data than their first. CONCLUSIONS: eConsult was successfully implemented in four new provinces across Canada. Implementation strategies and scope varied, but services demonstrated substantial consistency on several key metrics, most notably on whether new information was learnt and impact on decision to refer. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6550029/ /pubmed/31152043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028888 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Liddy, Clare
Bello, Aminu
Cook, Jean
Drimer, Neil
Pilon, Maxine Dumas
Farrell, Gerard
Glassford, Jodi
Ireland, Laurie
McDonald, Rana
Nabelsi, Véronique
Oppenheimer, Luis
Singer, Alex
Keely, Erin
Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
title Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
title_full Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
title_fullStr Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
title_short Supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across Canada: cross-sectional analysis
title_sort supporting the spread and scale-up of electronic consultation across canada: cross-sectional analysis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028888
work_keys_str_mv AT liddyclare supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT belloaminu supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT cookjean supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT drimerneil supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT pilonmaxinedumas supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT farrellgerard supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT glassfordjodi supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT irelandlaurie supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT mcdonaldrana supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT nabelsiveronique supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT oppenheimerluis supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT singeralex supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis
AT keelyerin supportingthespreadandscaleupofelectronicconsultationacrosscanadacrosssectionalanalysis