Cargando…
Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables
Hip fractures are a leading cause of death and disability among older adults. Hip fractures are also the most commonly missed diagnosis on pelvic radiographs, and delayed diagnosis leads to higher cost and worse outcomes. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms have shown promise for helping radio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0105-1 |
_version_ | 1783424135165116416 |
---|---|
author | Badgeley, Marcus A. Zech, John R. Oakden-Rayner, Luke Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Liu, Manway Gale, William McConnell, Michael V. Percha, Bethany Snyder, Thomas M. Dudley, Joel T. |
author_facet | Badgeley, Marcus A. Zech, John R. Oakden-Rayner, Luke Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Liu, Manway Gale, William McConnell, Michael V. Percha, Bethany Snyder, Thomas M. Dudley, Joel T. |
author_sort | Badgeley, Marcus A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hip fractures are a leading cause of death and disability among older adults. Hip fractures are also the most commonly missed diagnosis on pelvic radiographs, and delayed diagnosis leads to higher cost and worse outcomes. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms have shown promise for helping radiologists detect fractures, but the image features underpinning their predictions are notoriously difficult to understand. In this study, we trained deep-learning models on 17,587 radiographs to classify fracture, 5 patient traits, and 14 hospital process variables. All 20 variables could be individually predicted from a radiograph, with the best performances on scanner model (AUC = 1.00), scanner brand (AUC = 0.98), and whether the order was marked “priority” (AUC = 0.79). Fracture was predicted moderately well from the image (AUC = 0.78) and better when combining image features with patient data (AUC = 0.86, DeLong paired AUC comparison, p = 2e-9) or patient data plus hospital process features (AUC = 0.91, p = 1e-21). Fracture prediction on a test set that balanced fracture risk across patient variables was significantly lower than a random test set (AUC = 0.67, DeLong unpaired AUC comparison, p = 0.003); and on a test set with fracture risk balanced across patient and hospital process variables, the model performed randomly (AUC = 0.52, 95% CI 0.46–0.58), indicating that these variables were the main source of the model’s fracture predictions. A single model that directly combines image features, patient, and hospital process data outperforms a Naive Bayes ensemble of an image-only model prediction, patient, and hospital process data. If CAD algorithms are inexplicably leveraging patient and process variables in their predictions, it is unclear how radiologists should interpret their predictions in the context of other known patient data. Further research is needed to illuminate deep-learning decision processes so that computers and clinicians can effectively cooperate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6550136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65501362019-07-12 Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables Badgeley, Marcus A. Zech, John R. Oakden-Rayner, Luke Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Liu, Manway Gale, William McConnell, Michael V. Percha, Bethany Snyder, Thomas M. Dudley, Joel T. NPJ Digit Med Article Hip fractures are a leading cause of death and disability among older adults. Hip fractures are also the most commonly missed diagnosis on pelvic radiographs, and delayed diagnosis leads to higher cost and worse outcomes. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms have shown promise for helping radiologists detect fractures, but the image features underpinning their predictions are notoriously difficult to understand. In this study, we trained deep-learning models on 17,587 radiographs to classify fracture, 5 patient traits, and 14 hospital process variables. All 20 variables could be individually predicted from a radiograph, with the best performances on scanner model (AUC = 1.00), scanner brand (AUC = 0.98), and whether the order was marked “priority” (AUC = 0.79). Fracture was predicted moderately well from the image (AUC = 0.78) and better when combining image features with patient data (AUC = 0.86, DeLong paired AUC comparison, p = 2e-9) or patient data plus hospital process features (AUC = 0.91, p = 1e-21). Fracture prediction on a test set that balanced fracture risk across patient variables was significantly lower than a random test set (AUC = 0.67, DeLong unpaired AUC comparison, p = 0.003); and on a test set with fracture risk balanced across patient and hospital process variables, the model performed randomly (AUC = 0.52, 95% CI 0.46–0.58), indicating that these variables were the main source of the model’s fracture predictions. A single model that directly combines image features, patient, and hospital process data outperforms a Naive Bayes ensemble of an image-only model prediction, patient, and hospital process data. If CAD algorithms are inexplicably leveraging patient and process variables in their predictions, it is unclear how radiologists should interpret their predictions in the context of other known patient data. Further research is needed to illuminate deep-learning decision processes so that computers and clinicians can effectively cooperate. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6550136/ /pubmed/31304378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0105-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Badgeley, Marcus A. Zech, John R. Oakden-Rayner, Luke Glicksberg, Benjamin S. Liu, Manway Gale, William McConnell, Michael V. Percha, Bethany Snyder, Thomas M. Dudley, Joel T. Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
title | Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
title_full | Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
title_fullStr | Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
title_short | Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
title_sort | deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0105-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badgeleymarcusa deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT zechjohnr deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT oakdenraynerluke deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT glicksbergbenjamins deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT liumanway deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT galewilliam deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT mcconnellmichaelv deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT perchabethany deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT snyderthomasm deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables AT dudleyjoelt deeplearningpredictshipfractureusingconfoundingpatientandhealthcarevariables |