Cargando…

Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage

Ground beef makes up more than half of the beef consumed in the U.S. market. Although numerous studies have been conducted on microbial safety and shelf life of ground beef limited work has been done using a culture-independent approach. While past studies have allowed for the evaluation of a few or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinroth, Margaret D., Britton, Brianna C., McCullough, Kathryn R., Martin, Jennifer N., Geornaras, Ifigenia, Knight, Rob, Belk, Keith E., Metcalf, Jessica L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31166992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217947
_version_ 1783424177352474624
author Weinroth, Margaret D.
Britton, Brianna C.
McCullough, Kathryn R.
Martin, Jennifer N.
Geornaras, Ifigenia
Knight, Rob
Belk, Keith E.
Metcalf, Jessica L.
author_facet Weinroth, Margaret D.
Britton, Brianna C.
McCullough, Kathryn R.
Martin, Jennifer N.
Geornaras, Ifigenia
Knight, Rob
Belk, Keith E.
Metcalf, Jessica L.
author_sort Weinroth, Margaret D.
collection PubMed
description Ground beef makes up more than half of the beef consumed in the U.S. market. Although numerous studies have been conducted on microbial safety and shelf life of ground beef limited work has been done using a culture-independent approach. While past studies have allowed for the evaluation of a few organisms of interest, there is limited work on the microbial community associated with fresh ground beef. In order to have a more complete picture of the microbial ecology of the product, a culture-independent approach utilizing 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used. The objectives of this study were to characterize the fresh ground beef microbiome and the effect that antimicrobial interventions and antioxidants, applied to beef trim before grinding, and product storage have on community composition using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Beef trimmings were treated with antimicrobials and an antioxidant. Samples were ground, loafed, and overwrapped before being packaged in modified-atmosphere packaging. Samples were in dark storage for 21 days followed by five days in retail display. Periodically during storage, samples were collected for microbiological analysis and DNA isolation. Due to low microbial biomass, only 52 of 210 samples were included in the final analysis. These samples represented two antimicrobial treatments (peroxyacetic acid, and a sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate blend) and a control, from day-15 of dark storage and day-5 of retail display. As sample age increased, so did the number of raw reads (P < 0.001) and aerobic plate counts (P < 0.001), which were correlated (r = 0.94, P = 0.017). Across all samples, lactic acid bacteria were most abundant followed by Enterobacteriaceae; several rare taxa were also identified (namely Geobacillus, Thermus, and Sporosarcina). Antimicrobial treatment altered the bacterial alpha (P < 0.001) and beta (P = 0.001) diversity, while storage day altered alpha (P = 0.001) diversity. Enterobacteriaceae relative abundance differed (P < 0.05) among treatments and was highest in control samples. In addition to confirming previously described dominant microbial differences in culture-dependent results, these data identified genera not typically associated with ground beef and allowed for study of shifts in the entire microbiome and not just a subset of indicator organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6550395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65503952019-06-17 Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage Weinroth, Margaret D. Britton, Brianna C. McCullough, Kathryn R. Martin, Jennifer N. Geornaras, Ifigenia Knight, Rob Belk, Keith E. Metcalf, Jessica L. PLoS One Research Article Ground beef makes up more than half of the beef consumed in the U.S. market. Although numerous studies have been conducted on microbial safety and shelf life of ground beef limited work has been done using a culture-independent approach. While past studies have allowed for the evaluation of a few organisms of interest, there is limited work on the microbial community associated with fresh ground beef. In order to have a more complete picture of the microbial ecology of the product, a culture-independent approach utilizing 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used. The objectives of this study were to characterize the fresh ground beef microbiome and the effect that antimicrobial interventions and antioxidants, applied to beef trim before grinding, and product storage have on community composition using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Beef trimmings were treated with antimicrobials and an antioxidant. Samples were ground, loafed, and overwrapped before being packaged in modified-atmosphere packaging. Samples were in dark storage for 21 days followed by five days in retail display. Periodically during storage, samples were collected for microbiological analysis and DNA isolation. Due to low microbial biomass, only 52 of 210 samples were included in the final analysis. These samples represented two antimicrobial treatments (peroxyacetic acid, and a sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate blend) and a control, from day-15 of dark storage and day-5 of retail display. As sample age increased, so did the number of raw reads (P < 0.001) and aerobic plate counts (P < 0.001), which were correlated (r = 0.94, P = 0.017). Across all samples, lactic acid bacteria were most abundant followed by Enterobacteriaceae; several rare taxa were also identified (namely Geobacillus, Thermus, and Sporosarcina). Antimicrobial treatment altered the bacterial alpha (P < 0.001) and beta (P = 0.001) diversity, while storage day altered alpha (P = 0.001) diversity. Enterobacteriaceae relative abundance differed (P < 0.05) among treatments and was highest in control samples. In addition to confirming previously described dominant microbial differences in culture-dependent results, these data identified genera not typically associated with ground beef and allowed for study of shifts in the entire microbiome and not just a subset of indicator organisms. Public Library of Science 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6550395/ /pubmed/31166992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217947 Text en © 2019 Weinroth et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weinroth, Margaret D.
Britton, Brianna C.
McCullough, Kathryn R.
Martin, Jennifer N.
Geornaras, Ifigenia
Knight, Rob
Belk, Keith E.
Metcalf, Jessica L.
Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
title Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
title_full Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
title_fullStr Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
title_full_unstemmed Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
title_short Ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
title_sort ground beef microbiome changes with antimicrobial decontamination interventions and product storage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31166992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217947
work_keys_str_mv AT weinrothmargaretd groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT brittonbriannac groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT mcculloughkathrynr groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT martinjennifern groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT geornarasifigenia groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT knightrob groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT belkkeithe groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage
AT metcalfjessical groundbeefmicrobiomechangeswithantimicrobialdecontaminationinterventionsandproductstorage