Cargando…

Water Ordering on the Magnetite Fe(3)O(4) Surfaces

[Image: see text] The interaction of water with the most prominent surfaces of Fe(3)O(4), (001) and (111), is directly compared using a combination of temperature-programmed desorption, temperature-programmed low energy electron diffraction (TP LEED), and scanning probe microscopies. Adsorption on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaki, Eman, Jakub, Zdenek, Mirabella, Francesca, Parkinson, Gareth S., Shaikhutdinov, Shamil, Freund, Hans-Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31039610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00773
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] The interaction of water with the most prominent surfaces of Fe(3)O(4), (001) and (111), is directly compared using a combination of temperature-programmed desorption, temperature-programmed low energy electron diffraction (TP LEED), and scanning probe microscopies. Adsorption on the (√2 × √2)R45°-reconstructed surface of Fe(3)O(4)(001) is strongly influenced by the surface reconstruction, which remains intact at all coverages. Close to the completion of the first monolayer, however, the ad-layer adopts a longer-range (2 × 2) superstructure. This finding is discussed in the context of a similar (2 × 2) superstructure recently observed on the (111) facet, which exists over a significantly larger range of temperatures and coverages. In both cases, the long-range order is evidence that water–water interactions exert a significant influence on the structure already prior to the nucleation of the second layer. We conclude that the stability differences stem from the smaller unit cell on the (111) surface, and the ability of water to more easily form stable hexagonal ice-like structures on the hexagonal substrate.