Cargando…

Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby

Mouthguards (MGs) are highly recommended in rugby. Airway obstruction and a resulting decrease in power output are potential disadvantages of their usage. The aim of the study was to assess possible limitations of “vented” (MG (V) ) and custom-made mouthguards (MG (C) ) on rugby players’ performance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulze, Antina, Kwast, Stefan, Busse, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0891-7021
_version_ 1783424359023509504
author Schulze, Antina
Kwast, Stefan
Busse, Martin
author_facet Schulze, Antina
Kwast, Stefan
Busse, Martin
author_sort Schulze, Antina
collection PubMed
description Mouthguards (MGs) are highly recommended in rugby. Airway obstruction and a resulting decrease in power output are potential disadvantages of their usage. The aim of the study was to assess possible limitations of “vented” (MG (V) ) and custom-made mouthguards (MG (C) ) on rugby players’ performance. The MG effects were investigated in 13 male first-league rugby players ranging from 18–34 years old. First a lung function test was completed. Then a double incremental treadmill test was performed to measure maximum aerobic performance, ventilation, VO (2) , VCO (2) , heart rate, and lactate. Effects on sprint times (10 and 40 m) and countermovement jumps were also investigated. Peak flow values were significantly decreased with MG (V) by about 0.9 l/s. Neither ventilatory parameters nor oxygen uptake were affected by either of the mouthguards. Maximum lactate was significantly decreased in both MG types vs. no MG use. The maximum running velocity was similar in all tests. The aerobic energy turnover was moderately increased with the MG (C) and MG (V) . No effects were seen on sprint times or jump tests. Although neither type of mouthguard had a significant impact on maximum performance in treadmill running, the anaerobic energy turnover was decreased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6551212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65512122019-06-11 Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby Schulze, Antina Kwast, Stefan Busse, Martin Sports Med Int Open Mouthguards (MGs) are highly recommended in rugby. Airway obstruction and a resulting decrease in power output are potential disadvantages of their usage. The aim of the study was to assess possible limitations of “vented” (MG (V) ) and custom-made mouthguards (MG (C) ) on rugby players’ performance. The MG effects were investigated in 13 male first-league rugby players ranging from 18–34 years old. First a lung function test was completed. Then a double incremental treadmill test was performed to measure maximum aerobic performance, ventilation, VO (2) , VCO (2) , heart rate, and lactate. Effects on sprint times (10 and 40 m) and countermovement jumps were also investigated. Peak flow values were significantly decreased with MG (V) by about 0.9 l/s. Neither ventilatory parameters nor oxygen uptake were affected by either of the mouthguards. Maximum lactate was significantly decreased in both MG types vs. no MG use. The maximum running velocity was similar in all tests. The aerobic energy turnover was moderately increased with the MG (C) and MG (V) . No effects were seen on sprint times or jump tests. Although neither type of mouthguard had a significant impact on maximum performance in treadmill running, the anaerobic energy turnover was decreased. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6551212/ /pubmed/31187053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0891-7021 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Schulze, Antina
Kwast, Stefan
Busse, Martin
Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby
title Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby
title_full Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby
title_fullStr Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby
title_short Influence of Mouthguards on Physiological Responses in Rugby
title_sort influence of mouthguards on physiological responses in rugby
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31187053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0891-7021
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzeantina influenceofmouthguardsonphysiologicalresponsesinrugby
AT kwaststefan influenceofmouthguardsonphysiologicalresponsesinrugby
AT bussemartin influenceofmouthguardsonphysiologicalresponsesinrugby