Cargando…

Effects of the resistant starch on glucose, insulin, insulin resistance, and lipid parameters in overweight or obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The role of resistant starch (RS) in glucose, insulin, insulin resistance or sensitivity, and lipid parameters have been reported in several studies and remained controversial. A pooled analysis which assessed these parameters has not been performed. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yong, Chen, Jing, Song, Ying-Han, Zhao, Rui, Xia, Lin, Chen, Yi, Cui, Ya-Ping, Rao, Zhi-Yong, Zhou, Yong, Zhuang, Wen, Wu, Xiao-Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31168050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41387-019-0086-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The role of resistant starch (RS) in glucose, insulin, insulin resistance or sensitivity, and lipid parameters have been reported in several studies and remained controversial. A pooled analysis which assessed these parameters has not been performed. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to sum up existing evidence about the issue. METHODS: We searched in MEDLINE and PUBMED for studies that were published before November 2018. Meta-analysis of diabetics and nondiabetics trials were performed by use of a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 13 case–control studies that included 428 subjects with body mass index ≥25 were identified. RS supplementation reduced fasting insulin in overall and stratified (diabetics and nondiabetics trials) analysis (SMD = –0.72; 95% CI: –1.13 to –0.31; SMD = –1.26; 95% CI: –1.66 to –0.86 and SMD = –0.64; 95% CI: –1.10 to –0.18, respectively), and reduced fasting glucose in overall and stratified analysis for diabetic trials (SMD = –0.26; 95% CI: –0.5 to –0.02 and SMD = –0.28; 95% CI: –0.54 to –0.01, respectively). RS supplementation increased HOMA-S% (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.59–1.78) and reduced HOMA-B (SMD =–1.2; 95% CI: –1.64 to –0.77), LDL-c concentration (SMD =–0.35; 95% CI: –0.61 to −0.09), and HbA1c (SMD = –0.43; 95% CI: –0.74 to –0.13) in overall analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis has provided evidence that RS supplementation can improve fasting glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance and sensitivity, especially for diabetic with overweight or obesity. However, owing to potential sophistication, individual difference and composition of intestinal microbiota, this result should be carefully taken into account.