Cargando…

Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: New national guidance on urgent referral for investigation of colorectal cancer included faecal occult blood testing in 2015. A service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and anaemia as risk stratification tools in symptomatic patients suspected of having CRC was undertake...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, C., Bunce, J., Oliver, S., Ng, O., Tangri, A., Rogers, R., Logan, R. F., Humes, D. J., Banerjea, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50131
_version_ 1783424379392098304
author Chapman, C.
Bunce, J.
Oliver, S.
Ng, O.
Tangri, A.
Rogers, R.
Logan, R. F.
Humes, D. J.
Banerjea, A.
author_facet Chapman, C.
Bunce, J.
Oliver, S.
Ng, O.
Tangri, A.
Rogers, R.
Logan, R. F.
Humes, D. J.
Banerjea, A.
author_sort Chapman, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New national guidance on urgent referral for investigation of colorectal cancer included faecal occult blood testing in 2015. A service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and anaemia as risk stratification tools in symptomatic patients suspected of having CRC was undertaken. METHODS: Postal FIT was incorporated into the colorectal cancer 2‐week wait (2WW) pathway for all patients without rectal bleeding in 2016. Patients were investigated in the 2WW pathway as normal, and outcomes of investigations were recorded prospectively. Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin level below 120 g/l in women and 130 g/l in men. RESULTS: FIT kits were sent to 1106 patients, with an 80·9 per cent return rate; 810 patients completed investigations and 40 colorectal cancers were diagnosed (4·9 per cent). FIT results were significantly higher in patients with anaemia (median (i.q.r.) 4·8 (0·8–34·1) versus 1·2 (0–6·4) μg Hb/g faeces in those without anaemia; P < 0·001). Some 60·4 per cent of patients (538 of 891) had a result lower than 4 μg haemoglobin (Hb) per g faeces (limit of detectability), and 69·7 per cent (621 of 891) had less than 10 μg Hb/g faeces. Some 60 per cent of patients with colorectal cancer had a FIT reading of 150 μg Hb/g faeces or more. For five colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients with a FIT value below 10 μg Hb/g faeces, there was either a palpable rectal mass or the patient was anaemic. A FIT result of more than 4 μg Hb/g faeces had 97·5 per cent sensitivity and 64·5 per cent specificity for a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A FIT result above 4 μg Hb/g faeces and/or anaemia had a 100 per cent sensitivity and 45·3 per cent specificity for colorectal cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FIT is most useful at the extremes of detectability; strongly positive readings predict high rates of colorectal cancer and other significant pathology, whereas very low readings in the absence of anaemia or a palpable rectal mass identify a group with very low risk. High return rates for FIT within this 2WW pathway indicate its acceptability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6551399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65513992019-06-10 Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer Chapman, C. Bunce, J. Oliver, S. Ng, O. Tangri, A. Rogers, R. Logan, R. F. Humes, D. J. Banerjea, A. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: New national guidance on urgent referral for investigation of colorectal cancer included faecal occult blood testing in 2015. A service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and anaemia as risk stratification tools in symptomatic patients suspected of having CRC was undertaken. METHODS: Postal FIT was incorporated into the colorectal cancer 2‐week wait (2WW) pathway for all patients without rectal bleeding in 2016. Patients were investigated in the 2WW pathway as normal, and outcomes of investigations were recorded prospectively. Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin level below 120 g/l in women and 130 g/l in men. RESULTS: FIT kits were sent to 1106 patients, with an 80·9 per cent return rate; 810 patients completed investigations and 40 colorectal cancers were diagnosed (4·9 per cent). FIT results were significantly higher in patients with anaemia (median (i.q.r.) 4·8 (0·8–34·1) versus 1·2 (0–6·4) μg Hb/g faeces in those without anaemia; P < 0·001). Some 60·4 per cent of patients (538 of 891) had a result lower than 4 μg haemoglobin (Hb) per g faeces (limit of detectability), and 69·7 per cent (621 of 891) had less than 10 μg Hb/g faeces. Some 60 per cent of patients with colorectal cancer had a FIT reading of 150 μg Hb/g faeces or more. For five colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients with a FIT value below 10 μg Hb/g faeces, there was either a palpable rectal mass or the patient was anaemic. A FIT result of more than 4 μg Hb/g faeces had 97·5 per cent sensitivity and 64·5 per cent specificity for a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A FIT result above 4 μg Hb/g faeces and/or anaemia had a 100 per cent sensitivity and 45·3 per cent specificity for colorectal cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FIT is most useful at the extremes of detectability; strongly positive readings predict high rates of colorectal cancer and other significant pathology, whereas very low readings in the absence of anaemia or a palpable rectal mass identify a group with very low risk. High return rates for FIT within this 2WW pathway indicate its acceptability. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6551399/ /pubmed/31183456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50131 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chapman, C.
Bunce, J.
Oliver, S.
Ng, O.
Tangri, A.
Rogers, R.
Logan, R. F.
Humes, D. J.
Banerjea, A.
Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
title Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
title_full Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
title_short Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
title_sort service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2‐week‐wait pathway for colorectal cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50131
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanc serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT buncej serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT olivers serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT ngo serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT tangria serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT rogersr serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT loganrf serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT humesdj serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer
AT banerjeaa serviceevaluationoffaecalimmunochemicaltestingandanaemiaforriskstratificationinthe2weekwaitpathwayforcolorectalcancer