Cargando…

Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms are common in mental diseases and a variety of physical disorders, especially in disorders related to stress. More and more basic studies have indicated that gut microbiota can regulate brain function through the gut-brain axis, and dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Beibei, Wei, Jinbao, Ju, Peijun, Chen, Jinghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100056
_version_ 1783424389868421120
author Yang, Beibei
Wei, Jinbao
Ju, Peijun
Chen, Jinghong
author_facet Yang, Beibei
Wei, Jinbao
Ju, Peijun
Chen, Jinghong
author_sort Yang, Beibei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms are common in mental diseases and a variety of physical disorders, especially in disorders related to stress. More and more basic studies have indicated that gut microbiota can regulate brain function through the gut-brain axis, and dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota was related to anxiety. However, there is no specific evidence to support treatment of anxiety by regulating intestinal microbiota. AIMS: To find evidence supporting improvement of anxiety symptoms by regulation of intestinal microbiota. METHODS: This systematic review of randomised controlled trials was searched based on the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP databases and SinoMed. The retrieval time dated back to 25 July 2018. Then we screened research literatures based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation for each included study was done using the Cochrane risk of bias and the Jadad scale. RESULTS: A total of 3334 articles were retrieved and 21 studies were included which contained 1503 subjects. In the 21 studies, 14 chose probiotics as interventions to regulate intestinal microbiota and six chose non-probiotic ways such as adjusting daily diets. Probiotic supplements in seven studies contained only one kind of probiotic, two studies used a product that contained two kinds of probiotics and the supplements used in the other five studies included at least three kinds of probiotics. In the studies that used treatment as usual plus interventions regulating intestinal flora (IRIF) as interventions (five studies), only non-probiotic ways were effective (two studies), which means 40% of studies were effective; in the studies that used IRIF alone (16 studies, 11 studies used probiotic ways and 5 studies used non-probiotic ways), 56% of studies could improve anxiety symptoms, and 80% of studies that conducted the non-probiotic interventions were effective, while 45% of studies that used probiotic supplementations had positive effects on anxiety symptoms. Overall, 11 studies showed a positive effect on anxiety symptoms by regulating intestinal microbiota, which indicated 52% of the 21 studies were effective, and there were five studies that used probiotic supplements as interventions and six used non-probiotic interventions. In addition, it should be noted that six of seven studies showed that regulation of intestinal microbiota could treat anxiety symptoms, the rate of efficacy was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: We find that more than half of the studies included showed it was positive to treat anxiety symptoms by regulation of intestinal microbiota. There are two kinds of interventions (probiotic and non-probiotic interventions) to regulate intestinal microbiota, and it should be highlighted that the non-probiotic interventions were more effective than the probiotic interventions. More studies are needed to clarify this conclusion since we still cannot run meta-analysis so far.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6551444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65514442019-06-07 Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review Yang, Beibei Wei, Jinbao Ju, Peijun Chen, Jinghong Gen Psychiatr Systematic review/Meta-analyses BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms are common in mental diseases and a variety of physical disorders, especially in disorders related to stress. More and more basic studies have indicated that gut microbiota can regulate brain function through the gut-brain axis, and dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota was related to anxiety. However, there is no specific evidence to support treatment of anxiety by regulating intestinal microbiota. AIMS: To find evidence supporting improvement of anxiety symptoms by regulation of intestinal microbiota. METHODS: This systematic review of randomised controlled trials was searched based on the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP databases and SinoMed. The retrieval time dated back to 25 July 2018. Then we screened research literatures based on established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation for each included study was done using the Cochrane risk of bias and the Jadad scale. RESULTS: A total of 3334 articles were retrieved and 21 studies were included which contained 1503 subjects. In the 21 studies, 14 chose probiotics as interventions to regulate intestinal microbiota and six chose non-probiotic ways such as adjusting daily diets. Probiotic supplements in seven studies contained only one kind of probiotic, two studies used a product that contained two kinds of probiotics and the supplements used in the other five studies included at least three kinds of probiotics. In the studies that used treatment as usual plus interventions regulating intestinal flora (IRIF) as interventions (five studies), only non-probiotic ways were effective (two studies), which means 40% of studies were effective; in the studies that used IRIF alone (16 studies, 11 studies used probiotic ways and 5 studies used non-probiotic ways), 56% of studies could improve anxiety symptoms, and 80% of studies that conducted the non-probiotic interventions were effective, while 45% of studies that used probiotic supplementations had positive effects on anxiety symptoms. Overall, 11 studies showed a positive effect on anxiety symptoms by regulating intestinal microbiota, which indicated 52% of the 21 studies were effective, and there were five studies that used probiotic supplements as interventions and six used non-probiotic interventions. In addition, it should be noted that six of seven studies showed that regulation of intestinal microbiota could treat anxiety symptoms, the rate of efficacy was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: We find that more than half of the studies included showed it was positive to treat anxiety symptoms by regulation of intestinal microbiota. There are two kinds of interventions (probiotic and non-probiotic interventions) to regulate intestinal microbiota, and it should be highlighted that the non-probiotic interventions were more effective than the probiotic interventions. More studies are needed to clarify this conclusion since we still cannot run meta-analysis so far. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6551444/ /pubmed/31179435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100056 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Systematic review/Meta-analyses
Yang, Beibei
Wei, Jinbao
Ju, Peijun
Chen, Jinghong
Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review
title Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review
title_full Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review
title_fullStr Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review
title_short Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review
title_sort effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: a systematic review
topic Systematic review/Meta-analyses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100056
work_keys_str_mv AT yangbeibei effectsofregulatingintestinalmicrobiotaonanxietysymptomsasystematicreview
AT weijinbao effectsofregulatingintestinalmicrobiotaonanxietysymptomsasystematicreview
AT jupeijun effectsofregulatingintestinalmicrobiotaonanxietysymptomsasystematicreview
AT chenjinghong effectsofregulatingintestinalmicrobiotaonanxietysymptomsasystematicreview